If single bet is that preferable why people still don't become what they wanted?

[Issa56]

There is no guarantee about you winning when you place a bet on a single game what you should know is that the probability of every game winning and losing is equal, so any one with the view that playing a single game have higher chances of winning is not True.

Maybe you don’t just understand what people are saying. We all know when you are gambling anything can happen, and you have equal chances of winning and losing, but if you are a gambler and you involve yourself in single bet, then you are likely going to win more often than when you involve yourself in multiple bets. When you decide to place a single bet, immediately the match has been played and you win, then you going to be getting your money, but if you involve yourself in multiple bets, then you will have to be making predictions on two or more matches, which at the end maybe you might end up losing a bet, and everything is gone already.

The reason why most people don’t always like single bet is the idea that the odds are always low, so even if you are winning, you won’t really be winning huge amount of money compare to if you involve yourself in multiple bets, but multiple bets is just more risky than single bet.

[coin-investor]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

I don’t know how it will become reliable, or how a single bet can make you a millionaire. It’s not a guide, but rather an option for every gambler to choose their preferred way to gamble.

There are stories of single bet jackpots in slots, but it’s not a guarantee that someone can do it; it's gambling, and it involves a lot of luck to hit a jackpot in a single bet. One can rely on it and hope it works, but it's a long shot. I don’t follow it; I prefer to enjoy the game first, and I wish I had hit the jackpot.

[Stalker22]

Just to be clear, single bets are not helping you win, they are just making it less likely for you to lose everything at once.  The odds are the odds, and they are never in your favor.  In the long run, the house always wins, and theres a reason for that.

So, why dont people become millionaires of single bets?  Simple math says no.

[SOKO-DEKE]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

From my experience, if someone bets on a single match, the chance of winning is always higher than someone betting on multiple matches. But the issue is that there is no sure match, and if that is the case, it means that even someone betting on a single match can still lose no matter how favorable the odds may seem.so, it doesn't mean that when someone bets on a single game, they will win. If that were the case, many people would have become rich through gambling.

Let’s just understand that without luck, it's really hard to succeed through gambling. Even if someone bets only on odds that give them just a 2% return on their stake, it's still very possible that they will lose and these losses can happen back to back if the person continues.The point is,there is no guarantee in gambling.

[Ziskinberg]

So, why dont people become millionaires of single bets?  Simple math says no.

That question shouldn’t even be asked in the first place, it’s just a betting method that most of us use. But let’s look at the reality: the majority still lose in the long run. Even in games that aren’t purely luck-based, like sports betting, most bettors still end up with losses no matter how good they think their bankroll management is.

[salad daging]

It could be said that single and multi-bet matches are different, with single bets being more reliable than multi-bets.

However, don't assume that single bets are reliable; they can be combined with single and parlay matches. Overall, single bets still carry risks, but not as high as parlays. You can choose your favorite team that has a high probability of winning.

Single bets aren't always reliable if you bet big, and losing is painful.

[Asiska02]

Single bets are less risky but not a guarantee to make money quickly through gambling. The probability of winning a game in a single or multi-bet is still not certain, so you may still lose when it comes to single bet. When a game is based on luck, the resultant of it is always unpredictable.

Playing a single bet has the more chances of winning than losing much more than playing a multi-bet. You can be at disadvantageous for every win you get in a single bet because of the low odds involved, but you’re at advantage of winning your bet quickly and not depending on other games to get your cash out. The advantage and disadvantage of multi-bet is vice versal of the single bet.

But they share one thing in common which is gambling win still remains under luck and you should always only use the money you can afford to lose to gamble.

[Alpha Marine]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

Because the odds are usually small. You don't play ridiculous options when playing a single bet. You don't play correct score or other options that have big odds; you play it the same. It's 4 odds at most, but most times, it's always 2 to 3 odds, and those kinds of odds can't make you a millionaire.

People who play single games need to stake very high and double or triple their potential winnings. If you stake $100 on a 3 odds bet, you are expected to win $300, not exactly millionaire money, is it?
Some might argue that you can rollover and use the won $300 to stake on another 3 odds, but it's not that easy. That simple game of a big team to win or score 2 goals isn't always simple. Along the line, you might lose it all if you don't walk away with your winnings.

[Nwada001]

Who said betting on a single match is reliable? As we say that the money you deposited in a casino is highly likely to be lost, so is the money you deposited on sport betting sites, regardless of the odds that you go for. Only what people can say is that parlay is riskier, but it has its own advantages.

You are right that every dollar deposited into a casino is lost and should be considered lost until there is a high chance of winning or it has been won, but some gamblers don't consider it that way; they believe that every game with low odds presents a higher chance of winning than placing a parlay bet, just as we all know that the higher the number of games piped up together, the higher the chance of losing. That's how some people also consider single bets.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

How much are they staking that's the first question you should be asking because you shouldn't expect someone that's staking $10 on a single bet to become a millionaire anything soon despite the amount of odds that he's receiving. It's because the odds aren't always big with single bets and reduces the potential payout you're to get that makes people don't go for single bets that often. Gamblers always want to try out their luck with multiple bets. It doesn't work for many but we have few lucky ones that get the jackpot.

[Slow death]

Many people use this expression when comparing single bets with multi-bets. This is because if you only have one game to bet on, you have plenty of time to analyze the game well and make the best decision. Because it's only one game, the probability of winning becomes much higher when compared to the probability of winning for those who chose a parlay with 20 games.

Winning 20 games is much more difficult compared to winning just one game. You can do this test yourself. Choose a 10-game parlay and see how many games you win. Then choose a single bet and see how many single bets you can win. You will come to the conclusion that you had a higher winning rate with the single bet.

[Spaceman1000$]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

Talking about resigning from their gambling, nobody resigns whilst they are still winning. Gambling is not like a job people do and retire, a lot of people gambling for fun, so they do it till old age. However a single bet reduces your risk and helps maximise your winnings, though the winning in most cases might not be huge but you will get back your gambling capital with a little bit of profit on top of it. the higher the risk the higher the reward, so if you choose multiple entry bet, surely your odds will be higher, but the risk is also high too, so the choice is left for the staker to decide.

[mirakal]

Simply because we are here in the concept of gambling, and that means that any bet could lead into a loss or a win, it just depends whether you’re lucky or not. But most likely, as long as gambling is concern, it’s more of a loss  rather than a win.

However, the only advantage having a single bet is that you could win a maximum amount, but the chances of winning is undeniably low, unlike if you go for multiple bets, the chances of winning is high but you will only win a minimal amount.

[Rockstarguy]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

It is not as if a single bet is a guarantee to win, but gambling can't even be predicted. You can gamble multiple times and still lose. The reason why a single bet is always advisable is to prevent significant losses and reduce risk in gambling.

Gambling can never be predicted; it is all good when one approaches it with wisdom, and a single bet is what most people can afford in gambling. A single bet is not just about winning but also about preventing significant risk and ensuring that gamblers do not develop an excessive interest in gambling, which could lead to losses.

[TopT3ns]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

It is not as if a single bet is a guarantee to win, but gambling can't even be predicted. You can gamble multiple times and still lose. The reason why a single bet is always advisable is to prevent significant losses and reduce risk in gambling.

Gambling can never be predicted; it is all good when one approaches it with wisdom, and a single bet is what most people can afford in gambling. A single bet is not just about winning but also about preventing significant risk and ensuring that gamblers do not develop an excessive interest in gambling, which could lead to losses.

I also interpret the idea of single bet not as a strict principle, but as something to help stay out of a harmful gambling loop. We are able to do it without losing control because there is obviously a limit to the amount we are betting. This prevents us from feeling the temptation to bet more hoping to turn our situation around. This way we could be convinced that this gambling is fun and not the serious addiction that can destroy our financial status and our balance in our lives.

[Darker45]

~snip~

What's the difference in managing to win two single bets and two bets on the same parlay?
Statistically speaking, betting on the single matches and one full parlay in the end you will end with the same results, you will of course lose more parlays but the increased odds will get you to near the same result.

I did this experiment here:

Total after all rounds and 327 games
- Individual bets balance +13.44
- Multiplier balance +2.58

Parlays vs single bets over 30+ rounds, almost no difference!

As I've said, in the long run, you'll probably lose. It's gambling, after all. It's always the platform that wins. So, yeah, it's almost the same result. But, like your experiment's overall result would suggest, you'd probably last long with individual bets than parlay.

As you well know, the difference between placing two separate bets versus combining such bets into a parlay is that if you win one and lose one separate bets, you're only losing a little. Whereas, if it happens on a parlay, you'd lose all. If you win on all bets, however, the parlay gives you a bigger reward. Of course, because the risk is also higher.

If I may add, and I don't know if this also applies to others, combining only two bets for a parlay doesn't seem worth it. If it isn't 4 or 5, I'd rather bet on them separately, although the odds would significantly matter. For me, 1.80 or 1.90 and above may not fit in a parlay. The risk is already high and making it a leg of a multi-bet is pushing the risk even higher. I often only parlay bets with low odds.