If single bet is that preferable why people still don't become what they wanted?

[Tipstar]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

Well maths don't say so. It's more depended on odds and probability rather than if its a single bet or a parlay of multiple. For example if we bet on a single team win when both the teams have identical chances, you get somewhere around 2 (say 1.9) multiplier and the win loss of that would be around 50-50%.
The parlay are set in a way that the combined risk equates to the relative reward. i.e. if you bet on two team to win it on similar circumstances, your multiplier rises to somewhere like 3.8 but your risk too rises significantly with winning chance getting low about 25%.
If the parlay is giving you a multiplier of 1.9 from two, it means the winning chances are around 50.

[Ishicryptic]

Who said betting on a single match is reliable? As we say that the money you deposited in a casino is highly likely to be lost, so is the money you deposited on sport betting sites, regardless of the odds that you go for. Only what people can say is that parlay is riskier, but it has its own advantages.

No type of gambling is reliable, you take risks whenever you put your money on the line to win more money, although some types of games might seem easier to win than others. When you compare single bets and parleys logically the single bets will seem easier because it is only one game unlike parleys that are more than one game. But I think that it is a matter of preference, despite that parleys are more than one game some gamblers still prefer it. Single games are faster and that is why many bettors goes for it, it is as simple as that.

[Justbillywitt]

It depends on how much a gambler have in his account that will determine how much he will place on the single bet to be satisfied. Let's take for instance that a gambler has decided to settle for the single bet and he don't have much money to place on that bet he won't be making that big amount of money that will make him retire from gambling anytime soon. There are also rich gamblers that specialized on single bet and they are making money sometimes they lose as well. But I just want you to know that the single betting only favours the rich gamblers more and not a poor or middle class gambler.

[mvdheuvel1983]

Who said betting on a single match is reliable? As we say that the money you deposited in a casino is highly likely to be lost, so is the money you deposited on sport betting sites, regardless of the odds that you go for. Only what people can say is that parlay is riskier, but it has its own advantages.

No matter how much people try to make gambling to be that easy there is no easy game to gamble on that can guarantee you winning both casinos or sport betting are all difficult and the player is usually the intended loser the moment after making deposits, the odds may be very small and the team that is the favourite to win may be in good form but still the chances of winning will still be slim gamblers shouldn't expect winning all the time because not even a single bet gives you assurance in gambling.

[Oluwa-btc]

if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

This is to show that there's no reliability in gambling  and all of it is basically depended on luck  and again no amount of gambling can give you that expected money toure aspiring for knowing fully well about the risks involved when you do so. Single bet can be preferable cause it gives some chances of winning but not necessarily make you become what you wanted.

[stompix]

Single bets are generally better than multi-bets basically because you only have to win one in order to win your bet. Whereas, in a parlay, you have to win 2 or more bets to win your bet. That alone explains why single bets are better. The odds further show you that. Parlay gives you considerably higher odds because it's harder to win. The chances are low, risks are high, therefore, rewards are also big.

What's the difference in managing to win two single bets and two bets on the same parlay?
Statistically speaking, betting on the single matches and one full parlay in the end you will end with the same results, you will of course lose more parlays but the increased odds will get you to near the same result.

I did this experiment here:

Total after all rounds and 327 games
- Individual bets balance +13.44
- Multiplier balance +2.58

Parlays vs single bets over 30+ rounds, almost no difference!

[Akbarkoe]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

His view is that single bets are much better than double or parlay bets. This does not mean that single bets have a 100% chance of winning. The comparison cannot be based on profit, because gambling inherently involves complex risks in terms of profit.

However, when compared to parlay bets, single bets are much better.

[Cointxz]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Because it’s still gambling. Even if single bet has chance of winning you can’t still remove the risk involved on every bet. So you still have chance to lose in every single bet.

AFAIK that high chance doesn’t mean it’s 90% or more winning percentage. It’s just a description that you have high chance on single bet since it’s commonly compared to parlay bets that is much riskier than single bet.

[retreat]

While single bets are more reliable than multi-bets, they still carry risks, as there’s no guarantee that every single bet will result in a win. However, they are lower risk compared to parlays, which require all your bets to be correct to win, making them significantly riskier than single bets. Therefore, the chances of winning with single bets are higher than with parlays, but that doesn’t mean single bets are entirely safe or reliable. Careful calculation is still required before placing a bet, as the risk of losing is still present, though not as significant as with parlays.

[Porfirii]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Although we're focusing on parlays, lets not limit to them and let's think about multiple bets as several single bets for a moment. While going all-in in a single bet is riskier, the odds are thought to make casinos win in the long term, so I think that deviations (strikes of good luck) are easier in single bets.

But if we talk about parlays, then we shouldn't think in terms of deviations and profitability: what we look for is for great risk of losing, but with minimum impact, because we usually spend little money for the possibility if winning a big prize.

[sotelorene]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

First we must know that there is no game that is certain or sure and when you say a single bet  it means there are game or selected game inside the bet but I guess this is not what you meant by a single bet I think you wanted to say a single game that's only one selected game. But even if you select a game that doesn't mean the game will or is reliable, I have played a single game and it cut not once, not even trice and the odd of a single game most times won't give you a good return unless you stake with a huge amount of money which you are not even sure if it will enter or not.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning.

The problem with people is that they always coming to the positive side of something senselessly that they fail to recognize the drawbacks. Most of this who say this doesn't actually engage in it else they would've experienced the heavy financial loss associated with it. When you gamble on singles, you need a good capital for a tangible profit. This has given some guys good wins, as well as drawn people faster into addiction when they're busy chasing their losses.

It's not really better, every betting pattern has it's own troubles and for me the trouble associated with singles is bigger than that associated with parlays.

[The Cryptovator]

Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

From my perspective, a single bet is better than parlay betting. You don't necessarily become a millionaire from the single bets, because you really don't know whether your bet will win or not. But it's easier betting; parlays are quite complicated since you have to win all the bets. If the single bets make people rich, then we may see a lot of gamblers win and walk away as millionaires. The reality is managing the risk and proper strategy for the betting. Then at least it will increase the chance of winning, even if it doesn't make you millionaires.

For example, if you bet on team A, and it wins, it means you win. But on the parlay betting, you have to win all the bets you choose. Make it pretty simple; a single bet means a single prediction and one result. That's the reason why most gamblers prefer single bets since they're less risky. One wrong pick on Paraly would ruin the whole result.

[KTChampions]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

When you make a single bet, the bookmaker has a smaller advantage over you than when you make a multiple bet, but it still has an advantage. Choosing single bets does not make you a profitable bettor. So when you see arguments that single bets are more profitable, it means that you pay the bookmaker less and it is easier to find value there (if it is possible at all). But this does not mean that you will make money on them, you will lose, just less.

[mak013]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

It is just maths. Your bet depends on one event, you risk one time.
But no one says that it is easy way to become rich. As for me, just 15-20% of gamblers can make high quality analyze. Less than a half of them can calculate risks. Less than 10% of left - can make it every day.
So, you can get profit from the betting, but it is a) hard everyday work, b) can be impossible just because you can`t make quality analyze.

[Nahl]

I think it's about the winning percentages because usually single bet will have low odds with automatically the chances to won the bets is more high compared to double bets but don't mean it can be steady because every bets we have placed has a potention to loss so always placing single bets don't mean will always be profitable and became an the millionare

If we talking about how to became an the millionare from betting i think this thought is clearly wrong because when people targetting want to gets rich from gambling i think they had just putting them in the potential to become serious addicted because during my experience as a gambler being rich is impossible especially as a player which very often the statistics of gambling losses are greater than our wins

[Cantsay]

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

“Increase your chance of winning” doesn’t mean that for every specie number of bet you take you’d win a specific amount. You could take 50 single bets and still lose all of them without even winning a single one of them. So that should give you a reality of what gambling really is.

The reason why people go for single bet is because if they are winning they are winning, they won’t have to win some and then start hoping that the remaining ones go as planned too when it comes to parlay. In parlay you need to wait for some games to enter before you’d be able to receive your reward but for single bet it’s just one and if you’re lucky you’ll get your reward instantly but that doesn’t mean you’d have more chances of winning though.

[Mame89]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

This is what confuses me when betting on sports. Even before making a deposit, my intention was to place a single bet, but upon opening the site, my emotions completely changed. Seeing the available matches in the betting process convinced me of my analysis, so I bet on a parlay, hoping to hit the jackpot.

Even though the winning percentage for single bets is very high, for some reason, upon opening the site, my mindset shifted to betting on a parlay with a small stake, hoping for a big win. But besides hoping for a bigger win, perhaps many people choose parlays to test their luck, or perhaps betting on parlays is more challenging and entertaining than betting on single bets. Because, logically, betting on parlays has a better chance of winning than betting on parlays. I personally often use both, single bets and parlays.

[Solosanz]

Personally I think single bet doesn't mean it's reliable, but single bet is more comfortable.

I see your define reliable is something like the gambler will win continuously, that's why I don't agree with the way you think.

In single bet, you don't have to make your life complicated because you only bet one match and you don't need to think for cashout/wait till end.

[SUPERSAIAN]

Single bets have a high probability of losing. You're placing a bet. How can anyone become a millionaire? The odds of winning are fixed. Single bets are more reliable than multiple bets that's the only difference. Sports bettors praise single bets, but the probability of losing is still high. When multiple bets or single bets win, the only difference is that they were lucky that day.