Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 11:13:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [BETA TESTERS] needed for new Hardware Wallet  (Read 2624 times)
CryptoSafe (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 08, 2014, 07:02:56 PM
 #21

can we see a prototype and a list of features?

Currently we have 3 prototypes one that is almost the same size and shape of a Ipod nano with no numeric keyboard, other the shape of a conventional mobile phone with numeric keyboard, and a third that looks like a ipad air that as shrunken to a mobile phone size, the last one the current  price point is $299.
For the Beta we have to chose only one, and we still didn't decided, later our idea is to expand the offering.

Features:
- Complete stand alone operation
- Possibility of usage worldwide
- Support of multi account and multi crypto currencies (future releases)

BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
October 09, 2014, 12:31:24 PM
 #22

Please post pictures of all three.  Thanks.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
CryptoSafe (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 01, 2014, 12:02:20 PM
 #23

Updated with image of the prototype...
lyth0s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


World Class Cryptonaire


View Profile
November 03, 2014, 10:12:28 AM
 #24

This whole thing sounds like BS to me. If it only uses broadbrand and has firmware updates with no external connectors that means that you centrally push firmware updates to the device, which also means that you or an attacker could change the non-open source coded firmware to become malicious at any given time.

Also your initial statement was a self-recharging battery? How did you expect to accomplish that with no external connectors?

Monero - Truly Anonymous Digital Cash. Bitcoin Reading List 2017
CryptoSafe (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 03, 2014, 09:33:30 PM
Last edit: November 03, 2014, 09:47:45 PM by CryptoSafe
 #25

This whole thing sounds like BS to me. If it only uses broadbrand and has firmware updates with no external connectors that means that you centrally push firmware updates to the device, which also means that you or an attacker could change the non-open source coded firmware to become malicious at any given time.

Also your initial statement was a self-recharging battery? How did you expect to accomplish that with no external connectors?

Yes it as a single point of trust, users must trust that the firmware is not malicious, for a third party to infect the firmware is extremely difficult.

We are open to suggestions to improve the security of the system, do you see a more secure way of doing this?

the scenario that you install the firmware connected to a host is a much more security risky proposition.

Self charging batteries don't need to be connected, they collect the energy of movement.

http://www.treehugger.com/gadgets/self-charging-battery-generates-and-stores-energy-simultaneously.html

If you have any further questions please feel free to ask.
CryptoSafe (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 06, 2014, 11:51:23 AM
 #26

Any feedback is welcomed, we want to build a solution that people will use and love Smiley
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!