We're in a totally different datacenter where the guys totally understand Bitcoin and are out to make us successful rather than sabotage us. We've learned a lot of valuable lessons from our first datacenter nightmare, and won't be repeating the same mistakes.
The biggest change is we aren't relying on bitcoin earnings to pay hosting fees; hosting costs are built-in to the up-front pricing so we won't run into the issue of coming up short to pay the power bills.
You can probably find somebody to run it in an old dirty warehouse for $50/mo, but you won't get the same performance, stability, or latency to the big pools as you will get from being hosted in a professional datacenter.
Is that the same datacenter that f*cked you over and got the first few groupbuy's terminated? Or is this a new one? And in what sense is the situation different then before regarding getting f*cked over?
Flep I'm glad you see it toos. From what i sees they using someone elses data center, they don't own it. Without 2 data centers in different region's it justs not possible to guarantee 100 percent up time. Then to word it to sound like Bitmain backed it. Theys use Bitmain S3's on SOME of the cloud. All they have is bulk buyers quick replacement parts me thinks.
They made this sounds like a buy when it's a lease. You can pay for a S3 have it hosted in many of hosters on board, and pay less. This company charges more for a sneaky sounding buy that is a lease. So they solved hosting fee by having you pays all upfront and pay for something you will NEVER owns. Then they lease S3 again most likely.
They ignored me for asking for proof of Bitmain backing SLA not just being fast parts in RMA. And question deception on words they no likes.
No answers here I see besides they found way to word trickys, and make customer pay for something they never owns all up front.
