Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 05:56:48 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: After they haven't moved for
30 years
77 years
250 years
>500 years
never

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: POLL: When should bitcoins be considered lost forever  (Read 1080 times)
Flashman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Hodl!


View Profile
January 11, 2015, 02:49:30 PM
 #21

Quantum entanglement data communication has been demonstrated in the lab and is currently undergoing testing at significant distances.... this should mean, that by the time we are ready to go to other stars, we can have a hugely powerful laser pointed at the destination, that while it will take the speed of light time to first establish the link, will then offer instantaneous communication, so first humans to alpha centauri could possibly have a less laggy internet connection than everyone does now. Provided they remember to fire the laser about 5 years before they get there.... (Not absolutely sure on this, but it may be required to drop off a mirror exactly halfway, easier than freezing the photons for 5 years I assume.)

I'm not a physicist, but many answers in the Physics Stack Exchange seem to agree that communication via quantum entanglement is not possible. For example: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/15282/quantum-entanglement-faster-than-speed-of-light

That was 2011, do you read 19th century textbooks about aerodynamics?  Wink

http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-communications-leap-out-of-the-lab-1.15093

TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6

Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
R2D221
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 11, 2015, 06:34:55 PM
 #22

I'm not a physicist, but many answers in the Physics Stack Exchange seem to agree that communication via quantum entanglement is not possible. For example: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/15282/quantum-entanglement-faster-than-speed-of-light

That was 2011, do you read 19th century textbooks about aerodynamics?  Wink

http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-communications-leap-out-of-the-lab-1.15093

Your linked article only talks about using quantum physics to send private keys securely. It mentions nothing about sending them faster than light.

Here's a link to a more recent question (2015) which still states it's impossible: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/157018/why-does-the-speed-of-light-totally-prevent-instantaneous-information-exchange/157022#157022

It basically says that having faster-than-light communication enables causality violation, such as the Tachyonic antitelephone.

Also, in what kind of system is 2011 in the 19th century?

An economy based on endless growth is unsustainable.
Flashman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Hodl!


View Profile
January 11, 2015, 06:57:37 PM
 #23

That was perhaps the wrong example, being as they were focussed on the "telltale" nature of quantum keys.

However, quantum teleportation research has been heating up the last few years, and practical demonstrations of it's abilities will probably be more widespread in the near future.

"What we knew" about heavier than air flight was turned on it's head in 3 short years from the end of the 19th century. I meant to draw a similar parallel.

I'm sure the well meaning amateurs on stackexchange will catch up with this eventually.

TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6

Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
R2D221
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 11, 2015, 07:19:32 PM
 #24

I'm sure the well meaning amateurs on stackexchange will catch up with this eventually.

You say that as if you knew something that they don't. In such a case, you should contribute to them.

I still don't understand how the causality violation is resolved, or maybe we can break causality without any consequences? (I find irony in that question)

An economy based on endless growth is unsustainable.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!