myrkul
|
|
August 24, 2012, 09:59:33 PM |
|
Please enter your gender at birth if you cannot classify yourself as male or female.
That will cover almost everyone.
|
|
|
|
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1722
|
|
September 13, 2012, 06:57:43 PM |
|
|
Signature space available for rent.
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5250
Merit: 13108
|
|
September 13, 2012, 08:04:12 PM Last edit: September 13, 2012, 08:15:33 PM by theymos |
|
For users with more than 4 posts who filled out this info in their profiles: 1,660 Male 65 Female Birth years: | 1 | 1901 | | 1 | 1908 | | 2 | 1911 | | 1 | 1933 | | 2 | 1941 | | 2 | 1949 | | 1 | 1950 | | 3 | 1951 | | 1 | 1954 | | 1 | 1955 | | 1 | 1956 | | 5 | 1957 | | 2 | 1958 | | 3 | 1960 | | 3 | 1961 | | 2 | 1963 | | 2 | 1964 | | 5 | 1965 | | 7 | 1966 | | 5 | 1967 | | 10 | 1968 | | 9 | 1969 | | 18 | 1970 | | 8 | 1971 | | 8 | 1972 | | 14 | 1973 | | 17 | 1974 | | 15 | 1975 | | 16 | 1976 | | 19 | 1977 | | 22 | 1978 | | 26 | 1979 | | 42 | 1980 | | 32 | 1981 | | 28 | 1982 | | 43 | 1983 | | 24 | 1984 | | 38 | 1985 | | 40 | 1986 | | 28 | 1987 | | 34 | 1988 | | 37 | 1989 | | 38 | 1990 | | 23 | 1991 | | 31 | 1992 | | 9 | 1993 | | 11 | 1994 | | 11 | 1995 | | 4 | 1996 | | 4 | 1997 | | 2 | 1998 | | 1 | 2001 | | 1 | 2003 |
Total: 713
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
dree12 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
|
|
September 13, 2012, 08:09:14 PM |
|
For users with more than 4 posts who filled out this info in their profiles:
1,660 Male 65 Female
Birth years:
| 4 | 1996 | | 4 | 1997 | | 2 | 1998 | | 1 | 2001 | | 1 | 2003 | I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5250
Merit: 13108
|
|
September 13, 2012, 08:17:34 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
Could be. I was also surprised about that.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
gbl08ma
|
|
September 13, 2012, 09:10:03 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
Could be. I was also surprised about that. Not only that, some of these younger people tend to say they are older than what they actually are (even though those usually don't get out of the newbie section, and when they get, some deserve being sent back)... Personally I'll vote in for the "Male, 10–19" category now. It's not like my real date of birth and gender can't be easily found with a internet search...
|
|
|
|
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1722
|
|
September 13, 2012, 10:50:46 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
There is 64k of members and only 2.7% of them filled out the info in their profiles. The list is too small (not to mention we don't how many of them submit false info to gain credibility).
|
Signature space available for rent.
|
|
|
dree12 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
|
|
September 13, 2012, 11:20:18 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
There is 64k of members and only 2.7% of them filled out the info in their profiles. The list is too small (not to mention we don't how many of them submit false info to gain credibility). I guess it might have something to do with the scams on these forums. Minors, which are prevalent scammers, register and claim to be 20+ for credibility.
|
|
|
|
mobodick
|
|
September 14, 2012, 12:21:00 PM Last edit: September 14, 2012, 12:45:00 PM by mobodick |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
You don't have to buy it because that is not what you're measuring. You're specifically measuring the age of people who found this thread and participated in the poll. And then there is no certainty about truthfullness of answers. It is not a balanced representation of the people visiting this forum. Edit: fixed some quoting confusion
|
|
|
|
muyuu
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 14, 2012, 12:30:26 PM Last edit: September 14, 2012, 12:54:39 PM by muyuu |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
You don't have to buy it because that is not what you're measuring. You're specifically measuring the age of people who found this thread and participated in the poll. And then there is no certainty about truthfullness of answers. It is not a balanced representation of the people visiting this forum. It does convey the general picture that the biggest group is males in their 20s followed by males in their 30s. That's the impression I get as well.
|
GPG ID: 7294199D - OTC ID: muyuu (470F97EB7294199D) forum tea fund BTC 1Epv7KHbNjYzqYVhTCgXWYhGSkv7BuKGEU DOGE DF1eTJ2vsxjHpmmbKu9jpqsrg5uyQLWksM CAP F1MzvmmHwP2UhFq82NQT7qDU9NQ8oQbtkQ
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
September 14, 2012, 12:36:34 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
You don't have to buy it because that is not what you're measuring. You're specifically measuring the age of people who found this thread and participated in the poll. And then there is no certainty about truthfullness of answers. It is not a balanced representation of the people visiting this forum. It does convey the general picture that the biggest group is males in their 20s followed by males in their 30s. That's the impression I get as well. Sorry, I just had to fix that.
|
|
|
|
dree12 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
|
|
September 14, 2012, 07:36:26 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
You don't have to buy it because that is not what you're measuring. You're specifically measuring the age of people who found this thread and participated in the poll. And then there is no certainty about truthfullness of answers. It is not a balanced representation of the people visiting this forum. Edit: fixed some quoting confusion I acknowledged this, but I was not referring to people I was measuring. I was referring to theymos's forum dump, which did not seem accurate.
|
|
|
|
mobodick
|
|
September 14, 2012, 09:42:36 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
You don't have to buy it because that is not what you're measuring. You're specifically measuring the age of people who found this thread and participated in the poll. And then there is no certainty about truthfullness of answers. It is not a balanced representation of the people visiting this forum. Edit: fixed some quoting confusion I acknowledged this, but I was not referring to people I was measuring. I was referring to theymos's forum dump, which did not seem accurate. Sorry, i derpt...
|
|
|
|
matthewh3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
|
|
September 30, 2012, 10:12:38 PM |
|
I don't buy that that is all the people under 16 on these forums (0.7% is far too low). Maybe younger people tend to be more anonymous?
Could be. I was also surprised about that. Not only that, some of these younger people tend to say they are older than what they actually are (even though those usually don't get out of the newbie section, and when they get, some deserve being sent back)... Personally I'll vote in for the "Male, 10–19" category now. It's not like my real date of birth and gender can't be easily found with a internet search... Also I could imagine a lot of the very younger people just follow and read the forum with out actually joining.
|
|
|
|
fimp
|
|
January 30, 2013, 10:19:46 PM |
|
For users with more than 4 posts who filled out this info in their profiles:
1,660 Male 65 Female
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=statsThis says ratio 2.9:1. Is that because it includes also members with less than 4 posts?
|
|
|
|
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1722
|
|
January 30, 2013, 10:30:28 PM |
|
It's because a lot of people didn't submit this kind of info - you included
|
Signature space available for rent.
|
|
|
fimp
|
|
January 30, 2013, 10:33:28 PM |
|
It's because a lot of people didn't submit this kind of info - you included What I don't understand is how jgarzik's ratio and the ratio I found on that stats-page can be different when the data source is seemingly the same.
|
|
|
|
dree12 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
|
|
January 30, 2013, 10:40:44 PM |
|
It's because a lot of people didn't submit this kind of info - you included What I don't understand is how jgarzik's ratio and the ratio I found on that stats-page can be different when the data source is seemingly the same. Most of the "females" on this board are zero-post spambots, which register with a 1:1 sex ratio. See this page and all subsequent pages for the zero-post spambots.
|
|
|
|
fimp
|
|
January 30, 2013, 10:51:52 PM |
|
It's because a lot of people didn't submit this kind of info - you included What I don't understand is how jgarzik's ratio and the ratio I found on that stats-page can be different when the data source is seemingly the same. Most of the "females" on this board are zero-post spambots, which register with a 1:1 sex ratio. See this page and all subsequent pages for the zero-post spambots. Ok, right, as I guessed.
|
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
July 26, 2013, 05:43:14 AM |
|
A few months passed reposts to modify the data
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
|