Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 08:42:09 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: No Murder Charge For Woman Suspected Of Cutting Unborn Baby From Woman’s Belly  (Read 450 times)
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
March 27, 2015, 10:04:06 PM
 #1




LONGMONT, Colo. (CBS4) – A woman suspected of cutting an unborn baby from a woman’s belly in Longmont won’t face murder charges for the baby’s death, according to the Boulder County district attorney.
CBS4 has confirmed that District Attorney Stan Garnett won’t charge Dynel Lane, 34, with murder, but she will still face a variety of other charges.

Police say Michelle Wilkins, 26, had answered a Craigslist ad for baby clothes placed by Lane. Lane is accused of stabbing Wilkins and removing her baby. Lane was arrested at Longmont United Hospital with a deceased baby. Police say she said she had a miscarriage.

Wilkins left the hospital on Wednesday and is recovering at home.
“We cannot predict what lies ahead for Michelle,” the Wilkins family said in a statement released Wednesday. “What we can say is that we have all been deeply moved by the many people who have reached out to Michelle and her partner to share their own personal stories of tragedies they’ve endured and how they managed to first just survive and then eventually start to heal. That alone has given us the strength to get up and face each day.”


http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/03/26/woman-suspected-of-cutting-unborn-baby-from-womans-belly-wont-face-murder-charges/


--------------------
Maybe the DA considered her a pro-choice activist?

 Roll Eyes


Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 27, 2015, 10:40:37 PM
 #2

Well, Denver is a liberal area like most other big cities but this makes no sense as to why this isn't easily considered a homicide. While abortion is legal I'd imagine that it would have to be performed by a licensed doctor of sorts. Anyone that would perform this particular act is nutso in my opinion. Not to mention, the woman was allegedly expecting baby clothes and then this happens.
Snail2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 27, 2015, 10:49:17 PM
 #3

She should be locked up in a mental hospital.
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
March 27, 2015, 11:14:36 PM
 #4

Well, Denver is a liberal area like most other big cities but this makes no sense as to why this isn't easily considered a homicide. While abortion is legal I'd imagine that it would have to be performed by a licensed doctor of sorts. Anyone that would perform this particular act is nutso in my opinion. Not to mention, the woman was allegedly expecting baby clothes and then this happens.

[...]
Why can’t prosecutors charge Lane with murder? Colorado is one of only 12 states that do not protect unborn children from murder. For that gap, Coloradans can thank Democrats who controlled the state legislature, and the abortion industry that controls Democrats … and themselves for buying their arguments when they had a chance to prevent this injustice:

Even though the baby girl died, legal experts say the case is complicated by the fact that Colorado is one of 12 states that do not have a fetal homicide law. State lawmakers in 2013 voted down such a measure over fears it would interfere with abortion rights, and voters overwhelmingly agreed when they rejected a similar ballot measure in 2014.

Colorado legislators did pass a measure that makes it a felony to violently cause the death of a mother’s fetus. The maximum punishment under that provision is 32 years in prison, whereas a person convicted of homicide in Colorado could face the death penalty or life in prison without the possibility of parole.


The most jaw-dropping aspect of this case is that Lane certainly considered the “fetus” a human life. In fact, Lane was willing to kill the mother in order to steal the child, just to support her lies about being pregnant herself. She ended up using the dead child to claim victimhood for herself, saying she had miscarried. All along, Lane understood that she was attacking one human being to claim another, even if she had no compunction about either.

Colorado put the needs of abortionists above that of the unborn, and as a result the law treats one of the two victims in this case as a product rather than a human being. Now a family has to mourn the loss of their child while the legal system pretends the child had no claim on humanity. That’s hardly justice. Perhaps Coloradans should revisit this issue in the near future, and decide whether they’re on the side of abortionists and their apologists to such an extent that they can’t even recognize the humanity in a child in the eighth month of its gestational existence.


http://hotair.com/archives/2015/03/27/video-no-murder-charge-for-woman-who-killed-unborn-child/


Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!