FortuneJack,
There are some serious accusations in your main thread which you seem to be ignoring.
Please Address them.
Users should consider that FortuneJack is refusing to address several important issues lately when deciding whether or not to promote them in their signature.
Some of them explained in
THIS POST and the rest in the same thread.
Also, for some reason FJ is addressing old scam accusations which were ignored months ago as if they were made yesterday
IN THIS THREADUsers,
Just wanted to update this post for anyone considering to join this campaign.
Fortune Jack has deleted the questions I originally linked in above post, which was a self moderated thread.
I'll just post them here for now and change the link.
When I have time to put all the details together for the scam accusation I will let you all know.
Dear FortuneJack,
Please explain how your giant Video Contest concluded.
I understand nobody met the view requirements for the top 3 prizes, what about all the "Honorary victors like the fourth to the thirtieth placers will receive a total of 3 BTC each."
Here is how you advertised it, in case you forgot:
Massive amounts of Bitcoin in store for the victors
Winners will be determined based on the overall views their videos have garnered all throughout the campaign, which will be from Jan. 15 to Feb. 29, 2016.
A grand total of 10 BTC will be given to the contest’s first placer, which will be followed by a Bitcoin prize worth 7 BTC and 4 BTC for the second and third place winners. Honorary victors like the fourth to the thirtieth placers will receive a total of 3 BTC each.
On another note, the Jack’s Favorite award will be given to the entry that has been personally handpicked by the moderators of this Bitcoin casino. Of course, the titleholder for this reward will receive special and exclusive perks courtesy of FortuneJack.
In order to land on the first place spot, entries must generate over 15,000 views, the second place must generate at least 7,000 views and third place 10,000 views.
So far, the participants of the contest have been very active and submitting videos to Fortunejack. The process is very dynamic and videos look very creative and well-made. You can be even better if you make a little effort and submit your version showing your vision, your ideas about FortuneJack. Please be more active, submit your video and become the winner who will be awarded with 10 BTC!!!
Massive amounts of Bitcoin in store for the victors
Winners will be determined based on the overall views their videos have garnered all throughout the campaign, which will be from Jan. 15 to Feb. 29, 2016.
In order to land on the third place spot, entries must generate at least 7,000 views. 10,000 views, on the other hand, are required to be able to hit the second place title.
Meanwhile, the video that garners over 15,000 views will be crowned as the champion of this FortuneJack promotional campaign.
A grand total of 10 BTC will be given to the contest’s first placer, which will be followed by a Bitcoin prize worth 7 BTC and 4 BTC for the second and third place winners. Honorary victors like the fourth to the thirtieth placers will receive a total of 3 BTC each.
On another note, the Jack’s Favorite award will be given to the entry that has been personally handpicked by the moderators of this Bitcoin casino. Of course, the titleholder for this reward will receive special and exclusive perks courtesy of FortuneJack.
Also, I'd like to remind you it's been almost one month since I asked you to clarify your rules. You told me you were working on it a couple weeks later, remember?
Dear adaseb,
We have discussed this issue via mail. Hope everything is Ok now. Let us know should you be experiencing the login issue. Thank you.
Please don't ignore me FortuneJack, I'm trying to help you. This is the
third time I've asked now, do you think I'm being unreasonable?
Attempt #1
[LINK]Attempt #2
[LINK]Attempt #3:
Dear FortuneJack,
I don't see any rules about players having multiple accounts. Will you clarify your stance on this.
Are you aggressively taking action to prevent players from multi-accounting and punishing those who do?
If you don't prohibit multi-accounting, I suggest you mention somewhere that multi-accounting is permitted.
Simply doing/saying nothing on the issue is just going to hurt the honest players and benefit the cheaters.
Again, doing nothing will cause the most damage to you players who are the most honest.
Do you allow small cashouts to be processed by new accounts without any sort of manual review? For the sake of game integrity, I hope not.
Do you understand why nearly every other poker site reviews cashout requests when the funds are exposed to peer2peer wagering?
You should consider players cheating other players just as seriously as you take players cheating you.
PS - I'll keep asking you these questions until you answer, so please don't ignore me the way you have in the past.
Dear user,
Thank you for the interest in the above mentioned clauses. We read your message, we are aware of that and we will provide you with the answer. You do not have to reiterate it with that frequency as the reminder. Your opinion matters, thank you for helping us improve your future visits! Have a great day.
Sites need to be held accountable for their actions, so I'm going to open scam accusation thread if FJ doesn't address video contest and poker room policies soon (when I get around to it). And no, "We are working on the situation" doesn't count anymore.
If someone else wants to make thread, please feel free.
Also if anyone has any info not already posted on video contest please share. I only know whats been said recently.
I promise not to let these issues be forgotten if unresolved.
