negative trust

[leen93]

What can i do if someone (e.g. grtthegreat) gives me a negative feedback for no reason and mentioning lies within the feedback?

[1714756127]

1714756127

[1714756127]

1714756127

[1714756127]

1714756127

[1714756127]

1714756127

[Mitchell]

All you can do is talk with them and get them to remove it. Trust is not moderated.

[leen93]

All you can do is talk with them and get them to remove it. Trust is not moderated.

that 1 guy left bitcointalk and the other one doesn't reply 

anyways, I am allowed to inform every user of bitcointalk about this false trust and everyone is allowed to give those persons a negative trust because he accused me of things I didn't do?

[ranochigo]

All you can do is talk with them and get them to remove it. Trust is not moderated.

that 1 guy left bitcointalk and the other one doesn't reply  

anyways, I am allowed to inform every user of bitcointalk about this false trust and everyone is allowed to give those persons a negative trust because he accused me of things I didn't do?

Yeah sure but people would side EcuaMobi since what he said was absolutely right. As Michell said, trust is not moderated so admins can't do anything. If someone in the default trust abuses the trust, they would get removed immediately. However, people can still trust them by modifying their own trust list.

Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

[leen93]

All you can do is talk with them and get them to remove it. Trust is not moderated.

that 1 guy left bitcointalk and the other one doesn't reply  

anyways, I am allowed to inform every user of bitcointalk about this false trust and everyone is allowed to give those persons a negative trust because he accused me of things I didn't do?

Yeah sure but people would side EcuaMobi since what he said was absolutely right. As Michell said, trust is not moderated so admins can't do anything. If someone in the default trust abuses the trust, they would get removed immediately. However, people can still trust them by modifying their own trust list.

Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

There has so be a reason for the negative trust he gave me. He might be giving negative feedbacks hoping to get btc in reward to remove it which is scamming. I'm just assuming as much as he is assuming. If someone gives me a negative feedback for something I didn't do I have to give a negative feedback back, sounds logic to me... giving a false feedback is not legit

and what he said is not right, I don't and nobody controls the wallet he's talking about and you can check this wallet for the rest of your life in the blockchain...

[98problems]

if a scammer gives negative trust it does not make too much difference because he most probably also has - trust so you shouldnt be afraid of that

[leen93]

if a scammer gives negative trust it does not make too much difference because he most probably also has - trust so you shouldnt be afraid of that

so if 100 people give negative trust to him his false negative trust for me will not count anymore for me right?
then that's the only way to get rid of this red bar next to my name (which i certainly will because it's only there because of false accusements) if he denies removing it himself?

[ranochigo]

All you can do is talk with them and get them to remove it. Trust is not moderated.

that 1 guy left bitcointalk and the other one doesn't reply  

anyways, I am allowed to inform every user of bitcointalk about this false trust and everyone is allowed to give those persons a negative trust because he accused me of things I didn't do?

Yeah sure but people would side EcuaMobi since what he said was absolutely right. As Michell said, trust is not moderated so admins can't do anything. If someone in the default trust abuses the trust, they would get removed immediately. However, people can still trust them by modifying their own trust list.

Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

There has so be a reason for the negative trust he gave me. He might be giving negative feedbacks hoping to get btc in reward to remove it which is scamming. I'm just assuming as much as he is assuming. If someone gives me a negative feedback for something I didn't do I have to give a negative feedback back, sounds logic to me... giving a false feedback is not legit

and what he said is not right, I don't and nobody controls the wallet he's talking about and you can check this wallet for the rest of your life in the blockchain...

He left a neutral trust rating to advise people, not to point out that you are in fact a scammer. He didn't ask for any BTC in return for the removal of his feedback, I believe what you said is a daring assumption. Most of us here don't leave negative feedback to blackmail people since the person abusing trust would probably not be on default trust. If he is, once reported, the person will be removed and your trust will still be neutral.

Of course you won't be able to get your 0.0001BTC back. Why don't you ask an escrow to create an address for you and ask him to delete it so we would be SURE that you don't have the private key.

[chmod755]

Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

Pretty legit? Do you mean that guy with a positive score of +3?

Edit: Oops, I looked at his received ratings. OP remove the rating on Tomatocage

so if 100 people give negative trust to him his false negative trust for me will not count anymore for me right?

It's unconfirmed feedback, so it doesn't really count.

[leen93]

All you can do is talk with them and get them to remove it. Trust is not moderated.

that 1 guy left bitcointalk and the other one doesn't reply  

anyways, I am allowed to inform every user of bitcointalk about this false trust and everyone is allowed to give those persons a negative trust because he accused me of things I didn't do?

Yeah sure but people would side EcuaMobi since what he said was absolutely right. As Michell said, trust is not moderated so admins can't do anything. If someone in the default trust abuses the trust, they would get removed immediately. However, people can still trust them by modifying their own trust list.

Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

There has so be a reason for the negative trust he gave me. He might be giving negative feedbacks hoping to get btc in reward to remove it which is scamming. I'm just assuming as much as he is assuming. If someone gives me a negative feedback for something I didn't do I have to give a negative feedback back, sounds logic to me... giving a false feedback is not legit

and what he said is not right, I don't and nobody controls the wallet he's talking about and you can check this wallet for the rest of your life in the blockchain...

He left a neutral trust rating to advise people, not to point out that you are in fact a scammer. He didn't ask for any BTC in return for the removal of his feedback, I believe what you said is a daring assumption. Most of us here don't leave negative feedback to blackmail people since the person abusing trust would probably not be on default trust. If he is, once reported, the person will be removed and your trust will still be neutral.

Of course you won't be able to get your 0.0001BTC back. Why don't you ask an escrow to create an address for you and ask him to delete it so we would be SURE that you don't have the private key.

I say I am indeed assuming like he is. Since it's not true. I didn't own the private key when i opened the topic. And if you read the topic i even asked if there was a way to make a wallet and prove i didn't own the private key and then someone showed me that this idea already existed so that it was not necessary to continue anymore with this idea. But he said in my trust (whether it's neutral or negative) that i have control over that private key which is a lie.

[leen93]

Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

Pretty legit? Do you mean that guy with a positive score of +3?

so if 100 people give negative trust to him his false negative trust for me will not count anymore for me right?

It's unconfirmed feedback, so it doesn't really count.

but next to my name is still the red bar when i want to trade which might stop people trading with me, only because 2 people accused me falsely

[chmod755]

but next to my name is still the red bar when i want to trade which might stop people trading with me, only because 2 people accused me falsely

Where?

[XinXan]

Also, you are abusing trust by accusing someone as a scammer even though he is pretty legit.

Pretty legit? Do you mean that guy with a positive score of +3?

so if 100 people give negative trust to him his false negative trust for me will not count anymore for me right?

It's unconfirmed feedback, so it doesn't really count.

but next to my name is still the red bar when i want to trade which might stop people trading with me, only because 2 people accused me falsely

No actually next to your name there is nothing, it all depends on what people have other people in their trust list but for me right now i dont see anything in your trust, everything is at 0

[leen93]

ok when i check the same topic there is a red bar which advices people not to trade with me
but most people don't see it?

[XinXan]

ok when i check the same topic there is a red bar which advices people not to trade with me
but most people don't see it?

You have to go to your trust and look where it says trusted feedback, for example for me i only see dooglus on the trusted feedback and since he gave you a neutral feedback your general trust is at 0, you probably have someone else in your trusted feedback

[yatyatling]

Just checked that EcuaMobi is in both the trust depth 3 and 4. If you don't want to see it just change it to 2 and delete your false feedback for him.

[Amph]

ok when i check the same topic there is a red bar which advices people not to trade with me
but most people don't see it?

i can't see it either, all i see is 0/+1(1)

and this in your profile which isn't even in red letter

"Attempted to run a Ponzi scheme: "You can earn 0.01 BTC by depositing the latest deposited amount + 0.01 BTC, after the next person deposit's I'll send you your deposit + 0.01 BTC back etc." but apparently didn't realise what he was doing."

[notlist3d]

ok when i check the same topic there is a red bar which advices people not to trade with me
but most people don't see it?

i can't see it either, all i see is 0/+1(1)

and this in your profile which isn't even in red letter

"Attempted to run a Ponzi scheme: "You can earn 0.01 BTC by depositing the latest deposited amount + 0.01 BTC, after the next person deposit's I'll send you your deposit + 0.01 BTC back etc." but apparently didn't realise what he was doing."

I don't see it either.  I have to click on your trust and look in "Untrusted feedback".  I think you have enough positive and its trusted that the two negatives really don't matter much.   As we don't see them beside your name, which is good.

[yatyatling]

In my trust setting (depth=4) your account is even have a light green trust! (With EcuaMobi deleted his feedback) So now there is no problem that you are having a negative trust.

[tspacepilot]

Yup,I can also confirm that on my trust settings you show up as neutral.  I can see the negative feedback from grthegreat if I look through untrusted feedback but EquiMobi must have removed whatever he had placed their earlier.