Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 03:06:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: another cop video  (Read 1584 times)
Biomech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
June 21, 2015, 04:17:48 PM
 #21


OMG!
This is not the way things are supposed to be handled by a police officer..That cab driver was behaving so politely...
Officer is, to be put in plain manner, a bully...
Police are for the people... this is not the way it is supposed to be done... nope... can't be accepted


Therein lies the crux of the problem. That idea has been very successfully sold. Cops are NOT for the people. While a few of them may INTEND to do good for the people, it is the government that they serve and protect. As early as 1867 the Supreme Court of the United States held that the police have NO duty to protect or respond to the citizens. Given that Police forces were first in the United states just five years prior to that, it's pretty well established (though downplayed) who they actually serve.

emphasis added
1715137575
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137575

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137575
Reply with quote  #2

1715137575
Report to moderator
1715137575
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137575

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137575
Reply with quote  #2

1715137575
Report to moderator
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715137575
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715137575

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715137575
Reply with quote  #2

1715137575
Report to moderator
jaysabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115


★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
June 26, 2015, 02:42:20 PM
 #22


OMG!
This is not the way things are supposed to be handled by a police officer..That cab driver was behaving so politely...
Officer is, to be put in plain manner, a bully...
Police are for the people... this is not the way it is supposed to be done... nope... can't be accepted


Therein lies the crux of the problem. That idea has been very successfully sold. Cops are NOT for the people. While a few of them may INTEND to do good for the people, it is the government that they serve and protect. As early as 1867 the Supreme Court of the United States held that the police have NO duty to protect or respond to the citizens. Given that Police forces were first in the United states just five years prior to that, it's pretty well established (though downplayed) who they actually serve.

emphasis added

Do you have a cite for the 1867 Supreme Court case? I have searched for it and cannot find what this is referring to.

Biomech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 04:59:27 PM
 #23


OMG!
This is not the way things are supposed to be handled by a police officer..That cab driver was behaving so politely...
Officer is, to be put in plain manner, a bully...
Police are for the people... this is not the way it is supposed to be done... nope... can't be accepted


Therein lies the crux of the problem. That idea has been very successfully sold. Cops are NOT for the people. While a few of them may INTEND to do good for the people, it is the government that they serve and protect. As early as 1867 the Supreme Court of the United States held that the police have NO duty to protect or respond to the citizens. Given that Police forces were first in the United states just five years prior to that, it's pretty well established (though downplayed) who they actually serve.

emphasis added

Do you have a cite for the 1867 Supreme Court case? I have searched for it and cannot find what this is referring to.

I may have been misinformed on this one. I can't seem to find it now, either. Earliest cases I am currently finding are in the early 1960's, and there have been a number of them, both in the supreme and lower courts, all with the same ruling: Police have NO duty to protect or even respond to individuals. I'm gonna keep looking, I know there was such cases in the mid 19th century, but it may not have been the Supreme Court.


It remains true that the subjects of the empire are NOT whom the cops protect and serve.
dblink
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 05:43:59 PM
 #24

To be honest and honest, this is purely a communication gap, at first that guy who is driving the taxi seems like a Pakistani or Indian (no idea but certainly from an Asian countries), the driver gestures drove that officer crazy, the driver every time spelling that OK OK OK, come on dude, let the officer finish what he wants to convey and then say alright at the end of the conversation.

Biomech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 05:48:03 PM
 #25

To be honest and honest, this is purely a communication gap, at first that guy who is driving the taxi seems like a Pakistani or Indian (no idea but certainly from an Asian countries), the driver gestures drove that officer crazy, the driver every time spelling that OK OK OK, come on dude, let the officer finish what he wants to convey and then say alright at the end of the conversation.

If this were an isolated incident, you'd have a point. If it weren't in New York, the most international of American cities, you'd have a point. But neither is true. This is how American cops ARE. He wasn't even extreme. He just got caught.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!