Bitcoin Forum
July 22, 2018, 02:10:39 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2015-04-06] The Daily Bell: 'Tokyo, We Have a Problem.' Bitcoin's Fatal Flaw?  (Read 643 times)
btcbug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 07, 2015, 04:20:46 AM
 #1

http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36213/Tokyo-We-Have-a-Problem-Bitcoins-Fatal-Flaw/?uuid=6F7CB535-5056-9627-3C84632CD4F23AD4
1532225439
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532225439

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532225439
Reply with quote  #2

1532225439
Report to moderator
1532225439
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532225439

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532225439
Reply with quote  #2

1532225439
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1532225439
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532225439

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532225439
Reply with quote  #2

1532225439
Report to moderator
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1037


yes


View Profile
April 07, 2015, 07:19:26 AM
 #2

The law will follow economic reality, eventually. Its a flaw in the law at most. Bitcoin operates beautifully.

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion
.Anonymous and Untraceable.
ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord 





      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
.
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1041

It is Better to burn out, than to fade away!


View Profile
April 07, 2015, 07:35:13 AM
 #3

The "hot potato claim risk" does not even apply to fiat, why would it apply to Bitcoin?

BTC are not like fiat / paper money where the actual value represented is the contract between the issuer and the bearer of the currency. Bitcoin refer to a point in a blockchain/ledger {ledger entry}

How can someone else be entitled to a ledger entry? {There can only be one ledger entry refering to that value in the blockchain}

They just want to force KYC regulations onto people by implying this.  Sad {If you know all the persons, who owned the coins, you would be able to identify the previous owners, if it was stolen and you, would then have a claim against the new owners for those coins}  

Spot available if you want to advertise something :->
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1006



View Profile WWW
April 07, 2015, 08:44:10 AM
 #4

Bitcoin's fatal flaw is a peculiarity of the US legal system.


Unfortunately, the USA is the entire planet, so there's absolutely no solution to the problem.
btcbug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 07, 2015, 02:23:48 PM
 #5

The "hot potato claim risk" does not even apply to fiat, why would it apply to Bitcoin?

BTC are not like fiat / paper money where the actual value represented is the contract between the issuer and the bearer of the currency. Bitcoin refer to a point in a blockchain/ledger {ledger entry}

How can someone else be entitled to a ledger entry? {There can only be one ledger entry refering to that value in the blockchain}

They just want to force KYC regulations onto people by implying this.  Sad {If you know all the persons, who owned the coins, you would be able to identify the previous owners, if it was stolen and you, would then have a claim against the new owners for those coins}  



From the article: "Under the United States' UCC code (uniform commercial code) as long as bitcoins are treated as general intangibles, no high value investor can be sure that an angry Tony Soprano won't show up one day to claim that the bitcoins they thought they received in a completely unencumbered manner are actually his."

I believe what they're saying is that fiat is classified as money and so therefore, by law nobody can make a claim against your fiat if happened that you had already paid it to somebody else. To clarify further, imagine you sold me your car on paper, but then gave it to somebody else. Well potentially I could go after that car, claim it was mine and the courts might take it away from that third party.

Personally I still think BTC is the honey badger of money and it doesn't give a shit about some bullshit outdated law Smiley Let's imagine this is a problem for BTC, well then I guess everyone will just move over Dash, Shadow, Monero, or whichever alt-coin has the properties to protect them.

bitbouillion
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 542
Merit: 250


DCC│Distributed Credit Chain


View Profile
April 07, 2015, 07:47:14 PM
 #6

Amend the law, problem solved. Or drive businesses, innovation and tax revenues out of the US. 

   ██                                                     
██████                                                     
██████████                ████              ████           
█████████████          ██████████        ██████████       
█████  █████████    ███████████████   ████████████████     
█████     ████████████████   ████  ██████████  ██████████ 
█████        ██████████          █████████        █████████
█████         ██████             ██████              ████ 
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         ███████            ██████              ████ 
█████        ███████████         █████████        █████████
█████     █████████████████  ████   █████████  ██████████ 
█████  █████████    ███████████████   ████████████████     
█████████████          █████████         ██████████       
██████████                ████              ████           
  ████                                                     
/Distributed
Credit Chain
//
Empower Credit, Enable Finance
GithubFacebookMedium ‹‹‹dcc.finance››› RedditTwitterTelegram
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1037


yes


View Profile
April 07, 2015, 09:08:07 PM
 #7

It is pretty normal to have a system of law providing for protection of parties that acquired rights to an asset before that asset was transferred to an acquiror and, as a deviation, rule out such protection in case of paper money. However, also bearer paper could be excluded from protection, thus not hindering ordinary commerce and the exchange of certain paper promises that require absolute faith in their value to function. I would think all sophisticated law systems provide for this in a certain manner.

Perhaps Bitcoin can qualify as a bearer right (the owner is unknown until the owner identifies himself as 'owner' and the user needs to know for sure that he can access/use his Bitcoins for the system to work). It would make absolute sense to deem Bitcoin included in a definition or bearer paper.

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion
.Anonymous and Untraceable.
ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord 





      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!