hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 11:44:18 AM |
|
I've seen many Internet forums during my time online and I don't think I've ever seen one where users are financially rewarded for changing their avatars to advertisements. For a newbie who is new to the forums, it would probably look quite strange.
Well this forum certainly is unique in being able to earn money from it with signatures etc. To newbies it will just look like any other forum until they realize you can monetize your personal spaces. When I first came here I had no idea all the people who had PrimeDice signatures we're getting paid for them until I stumbled upon their thread in Services. Found it hard to believe you could get paid so much for such a little thing as a signature but here we are.
|
|
|
|
Mewtwo
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
ROAD TO HEAVEN...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 11:58:49 AM |
|
Avatar itself nothing bad at all, even very good if we use it in a positive way for the purpose of an impression to others, to the customers. I have also seen a number of avatars to make others feel uncomfortable , annoyed. Anyway, according to my thoughts, a avatar Campaign is OK but do not too abuse it
|
|
|
|
Havelivi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 12:12:38 PM |
|
i voted yes for that Avatar campaign and hope that will be best campaign like the previous one. i am waiting for that upcoming campaign to join that.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoiner7788
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 12:14:04 PM |
|
I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.
|
|
|
|
NOT-newbie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 12:26:51 PM |
|
I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.
|
|
|
|
el kaka22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3626
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 12:35:12 PM |
|
I just voted Yes. However the current existing avatar campaign's paying isn't high. I am looking for some higher payouts.
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 12:40:17 PM |
|
I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.
It will not be a problem because everyone will be allowed to keep his own avatar and add to the left/right side the logo of the service, or at least this is the best thing to do in my honest opinion. However you should only to be active and wait to be a full member and after you will be able to put an avatar. If you don't want to wait, buy a full member account from some buyers sellers in the "Digital goods" section. I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.
Also the signature is something personal but someone has invented the sig. campaign and this is the first forum I have seen that allow you to sell the signature place.
|
|
|
|
el kaka22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3626
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 12:46:18 PM |
|
I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.
It will not be a problem because everyone will be allowed to keep his own avatar and add to the left/right side the logo of the service, or at least this is the best thing to do in my honest opinion. However you should only to be active and wait to be a full member and after you will be able to put an avatar. If you don't want to wait, buy a full member account from some buyers in the "Digital goods" section. I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.
Also the signature is something personal but someone has invented the sig. campaign and this is the first forum I have seen that allow you to sell the signature place. Nope. The current campaign requires the whole space. See the identical avatars posted there. BTW, how can someone BUY an account from a BUYER?? What I am looking is not only a higher payout, but also a more personal advertising avatar.
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 12:52:33 PM |
|
I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.
It will not be a problem because everyone will be allowed to keep his own avatar and add to the left/right side the logo of the service, or at least this is the best thing to do in my honest opinion. However you should only to be active and wait to be a full member and after you will be able to put an avatar. If you don't want to wait, buy a full member account from some buyers in the "Digital goods" section. I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.
Also the signature is something personal but someone has invented the sig. campaign and this is the first forum I have seen that allow you to sell the signature place. Nope. The current campaign requires the whole space. See the identical avatars posted there. BTW, how can someone BUY an account from a BUYER??What I am looking is not only a higher payout, but also a more personal advertising avatar. Sorry, fixed. I meant the dadice and bit-x signature campaign, them could allow you (probable) to keep your avatar and add the site logo to the left or right side. About that campaign ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021711.0) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.
|
|
|
|
erwin45hacked
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 01:26:27 PM |
|
Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 01:38:34 PM |
|
Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month).
|
|
|
|
umairsaleem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 02:04:29 PM |
|
I'm not really want to see that, Signature campaign already takes most people's signature and that makes the forum kind of monotonous, people's signature are becoming the same, if everyone are wearing the same avatar and sig, then it could be annoying.
|
|
|
|
abyrnes81
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 02:06:15 PM |
|
I'm not really want to see that, Signature campaign already takes most people's signature and that makes the forum kind of monotonous, people's signature are becoming the same, if everyone are wearing the same avatar and sig, then it could be annoying.
You can always disable them view with the internal forum function or using ad block (or similar extension).
|
|
|
|
erwin45hacked
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 02:17:38 PM |
|
Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month). I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign
|
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 03:42:12 PM |
|
Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month). I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign agreed with you avatar + signature campaign would be more attractive than use 2 different campaign, i think avatar is campaign will be nice option to get more views to any link.
|
|
|
|
Mt. Gox
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2015, 10:26:45 PM |
|
I've seen many Internet forums during my time online and I don't think I've ever seen one where users are financially rewarded for changing their avatars to advertisements. For a newbie who is new to the forums, it would probably look quite strange.
Well this forum certainly is unique in being able to earn money from it with signatures etc. To newbies it will just look like any other forum until they realize you can monetize your personal spaces. When I first came here I had no idea all the people who had PrimeDice signatures we're getting paid for them until I stumbled upon their thread in Services. Found it hard to believe you could get paid so much for such a little thing as a signature but here we are. The strange part would be the sheer number of identical avatars. Imagine you stumbled upon another forum's thread and a quarter of the people posting in that thread have the same cat avatar, another quarter with the same dog avatar, another quarter with the same horse avatar, etc. It would look pretty weird to someone who isn't aware of avatar campaigns as they might wonder why everyone is using the same avatars. Some forums have default avatars which are shared across multiple users but these are typically designed to look as generic as possible.
|
Dear GOD/GODS and/or anyone else who can HELP ME (e.g. MEMBERS OF SUPER-INTELLIGENT ALIEN CIVILIZATIONS): The next time I wake up, please change my physical form to that of FINN MCMILLAN of SOUTH NEW BRIGHTON at 8 YEARS OLD and keep it that way FOREVER. I am so sick of this chubby Asian man body! Thank you! - CHAUL JHIN KIM (a.k.a. A DESPERATE SOUL) P.S. If anyone is reading this then please pray for me! [ www.chauljhin.com ]
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2015, 11:05:02 AM |
|
Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month). I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate.
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2015, 11:30:36 AM |
|
Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month). I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate. 0.1 BTC is a lot solely for an avatar, even more if it's only part of an avatar.
|
|
|
|
franckuestein
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1130
Truth will out!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2015, 11:36:04 AM |
|
I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate.
0.1 BTC is a lot solely for an avatar, even more if it's only part of an avatar. I agree with redsn0w. Marco, keep in mind that a logo is the first thing that you see when you're reading someone's comment. It's not a signature, it's an image with a service or company logo... In my opinion it's the most "distinctive" thing that we have in our profile. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
[ AVAILABLE SIGNATURE SPACE ]
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2015, 12:43:02 PM |
|
I have voted yes. Why would you need one? You can see other's that have them. Would you find them annoying if multiple people have the same avatar (if you can envisage)?
Multiple having same avatars is annoying to me. If enrollee's can put like Marco does, it will be okay. However, you might have to hire a part time designer for editing enrollee's image. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I think (for example) marcotheminer or other sig campaign maintainers will allow to keep our personal avatar but we should add a bit-x "logo" to the right side of it, and this way for me it's ok. I don't think it is annoying (more than the signature) and if someone don't want to see them, he can always use an extension (like ad block) for block specific avatars. just look at the marcotheminer avatar... he his asking to append the same stipe with bit-x logo
|
|
|
|
|