Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 21, 2012, 04:42:29 PM Last edit: January 03, 2013, 09:23:41 PM by JackRabiit |
|
So what am i doing wrong? Core 1040 mem 700 I've flipped around with the intensity obviously, Im running CGMiner 2.7.0 Im getting 468mh/s, And yet on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison I see a guy hitting 512mh/s with a 1ghz core, Using Poclbm When i run poclbm i get 475mh/s Why isnt CGminer being as godly as it used to be? Do i seriously have to switch back to a different miner just to increse performance? I love CGMiner! EDIT-I've followed some advice written below, And got the hashrate upto 493 Edit- Upgraded to Catalyst 12.8 from 12.6 and now im at 550mh/s at Core 1050 Edit3 Im using CGminer 2.9.7 now, With Diablo Kernal, Vectors 1, w256, Intensity 7 (using intensity 11 gives 6 more mh/s, but the lags not worth it) 576MH/s
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2012, 04:53:43 PM |
|
That does sound a little low, but not drastically. What OS/driver/SDK? Try switching kernels? CGMiner also has diabo, phatk, and diakgcn, all of which should be decent. On my 7970 I use "-v 2 -w 256 -I 9 -k diakgcn" and it works great (Win7x64SP1, 12.8, 2.7 here).
@1040MHz you should be getting close to 520MH/s.
|
|
|
|
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:06:48 PM |
|
That does sound a little low, but not drastically. What OS/driver/SDK? Try switching kernels? CGMiner also has diabo, phatk, and diakgcn, all of which should be decent. On my 7970 I use "-v 2 -w 256 -I 9 -k diakgcn" and it works great (Win7x64SP1, 12.8, 2.7 here).
@1040MHz you should be getting close to 520MH/s.
LOL, I forgot all the important info! 64bitwin7 12.8, 2.7 How do i tell CGMiner to use a differant kernal? Whats the command line arg? I think inside the config i can set it to a differant kernal... Im going to poke around.. THANKS!, Im pretty sure it's the kernel,
|
|
|
|
freeAgent
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:11:46 PM |
|
That's your rate on a 1040Mhz core clock!?!? I get 480Mh/s on 925Mhz using --intensity 5 as my only switch. I'm on the same OS/driver/SDK version as you are as well. Something is very wrong with your setup. Are you sure you're operating at 1040Mhz core (and it's stable)?
|
|
|
|
scifimike12
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:11:53 PM |
|
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm. Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1. That should yield the greatest results.
You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER. That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.
|
|
|
|
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:17:49 PM |
|
That's your rate on a 1040Mhz core clock!?!? I get 480Mh/s on 925Mhz using --intensity 5 as my only switch. I'm on the same OS/driver/SDK version as you are as well. Something is very wrong with your setup. Are you sure you're operating at 1040Mhz core (and it's stable)?
Hellyeah it's stable, It's stable at 1080. I've flipped around the kernals, getting/loosing 10mh/sec Phatk seems to do the best, Im gonna retry diablo, Since i think it'd be the best
|
|
|
|
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:22:27 PM |
|
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm. Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1. That should yield the greatest results.
You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER. That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.
Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:26:36 PM |
|
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm. Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1. That should yield the greatest results.
You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER. That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.
Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:32:55 PM |
|
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm. Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1. That should yield the greatest results.
You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER. That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.
Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s Try changing your I from 7 -> 9. LOTS of rejects Really?! That's pretty odd.
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:39:32 PM |
|
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm. Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1. That should yield the greatest results.
You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER. That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.
Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s Try changing your I from 7 -> 9. LOTS of rejects Really?! That's pretty odd. I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense? Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference
|
|
|
|
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:49:55 PM |
|
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm. Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1. That should yield the greatest results.
You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER. That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.
Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s Try changing your I from 7 -> 9. LOTS of rejects Really?! That's pretty odd. I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense? Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference 8, I went back, A set it to 9, Turns out that the last time i didthat, At the same time the pool switched blocks, LOL. I 9=487-491.3mh/s I 7=486.8-493mh/s
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:51:57 PM |
|
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm. Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1. That should yield the greatest results.
You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER. That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.
Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s Try changing your I from 7 -> 9. LOTS of rejects Really?! That's pretty odd. I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense? Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference 8, I went back, A set it to 9, Turns out that the last time i didthat, At the same time the pool switched blocks, LOL. I 9=488-491mh/s I 7=488-490mh/s Ok I was just curious. Sometimes I can get upwards of a 10MH/s bump going from 6 -> 9.
|
|
|
|
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 21, 2012, 05:53:08 PM |
|
Yeah, Going from 4 to 5 gives me 150mh/s lol.
Gonna try DiakGCN Gives me 450mh/s
|
|
|
|
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 22, 2012, 03:45:49 AM |
|
hey crazyates d'you have a coin address that i can kick you a tip at?
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:17:55 AM |
|
hey crazyates d'you have a coin address that i can kick you a tip at?
1De7KzFiYRHUVJCuy7Ap89xYbu2Z4q1F63 Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:43:55 PM |
|
Does anyone else have any insights as to why im missing 20mh/s? It's not like im looking for that "Maximum efficency" I just want to see my card it 500.01MH/s
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:48:39 PM |
|
Can you post either your full command line arguments, or your config file? Don't need any pool info, just the GPU settings.
|
|
|
|
nitrox
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:28:13 PM |
|
i run two HD 7950 they are different revision but that i run them I hope I was helpful.
|
|
|
|
freeAgent
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:59:57 PM |
|
i run two HD 7950 they are different revision but that i run them I hope I was helpful. What sort of cooling are you using in your case/GPUs? Those temps are crazy low.
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 22, 2012, 07:03:58 PM |
|
i run two HD 7950 they are different revision but that i run them I hope I was helpful. Stupid Trend Micro. I can't see the pic until I leave work.
|
|
|
|
|