|
Serith (OP)
|
 |
August 22, 2012, 04:34:44 AM |
|
TL;DR: There is three possible reasons why Matthew organized The Bet , and only the least probable one will earn money for someone betting against him. - Matthew is hardcore and rich gambler who is willing to bet maximum of 10k BTC in favor of low probability event, his risk vs profit evaluation isn't rational.
- He knows something about pirate40 that we don't, e.g. Matthew conspired with pirate40 or it's the same person.
- Matthew has no intention to honor the bet in case he lose.
In case you bet against Matthew N. Wright only the first option gives you a chance to earn money, but Matthew is a quite active member of the forum and we know a lot about him therefore I think that the first option is improbable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
elux
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1458
Merit: 1006
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:44:57 AM |
|
TL;DR: There is three possible reasons why Matthew organized The Bet , and only the least probable one will earn money for someone betting against him. - Matthew is hardcore and rich gambler who is willing to bet maximum of 10k BTC in favor of low probability event, his risk vs profit evaluation isn't rational.
- He knows something about pirate40 that we don't, e.g. Matthew conspired with pirate40 or it's the same person.
- Matthew has no intention to honor the bet in case he lose.
Just because you can't think of reasons doesn't mean there aren't any. Here's just on more out of the several I can think of: - Huge media attention mentioning Matthew Neal Wright and Bitcoin Magazine coming up.
Massively cheaper than placing actual paid advertisement with BBC, Wired, Slashdot, Forbes, The New Yorker, etc, etc, etc, all at once. |
|
|
|
|
Electricbees
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
We are bees, and we hate you.
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:48:32 AM |
|
MNW is massive entertainment in everything that he does. I have no problem betting against him even if my stance is one where I will lose. Interested in seeing how it plays out though. I hope that I lose...  |
Donations are welcome!
1BEES19ds5gEnRBoU1qNFPfjRXe94trMG3
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:51:52 AM |
|
- Matthew is Amish, hence the horse head mask. Further proof is that he hails from Indiana, home of Hoosiers, as in "Knock, knock!" "Hoosier?"
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinBull
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1001
rippleFanatic
|
|
August 22, 2012, 05:13:39 AM |
|
Your #1 is mis-stated (he's irrational, not rational). Although I can't discount #2 (conspiracy with pirate), I see #1 as more likely. This is not the first time I've thought an effort of his to be needlessly contrarian or overzealous. Before this it was his attack on aurumxchange over zhoutong.
|
College of Bucking Bulls Knowledge
|
|
|
|
Serith (OP)
|
|
August 22, 2012, 05:23:24 AM |
|
I see #1 as more likely. This is not the first time I've thought an effort of his to be needlessly contrarian or overzealous. Before this it was his attack on aurumxchange over zhoutong.
Matthew has to be overzealous and very rich for the #1 to be likely, is he? |
|
|
|
|
|
sadpandatech
|
|
August 22, 2012, 05:26:21 AM |
|
I see #1 as more likely. This is not the first time I've thought an effort of his to be needlessly contrarian or overzealous. Before this it was his attack on aurumxchange over zhoutong.
Matthew has to be overzealous and very rich for the #1 to be likely, is he? Maybe not rich but I don't know of any reason why he would not cover his wager if indeed he was on the payor end of it. Just to be clear, I am not encouraging anyone to make any high risk investments... Do your homework. ;p |
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
|
dust
|
|
August 22, 2012, 05:31:12 AM |
|
I am looking for insurance for my 250 BTC bet against MNW. Either:
1) I pay a fee, and if I win my bet and MNW does not pay, you will pay the full amount
or
2) If I win my bet and MNW pays, I will give you a cut. If I win my bet and MWN does not, you will pay my winnings. If pirate pays and I lose the bet, we exchange nothing.
Escrow is required, unless you are someone I trust greatly.
PM with reasonable offers.
|
|
|
|
|
Serith (OP)
|
|
August 22, 2012, 05:33:26 AM |
|
I see #1 as more likely. This is not the first time I've thought an effort of his to be needlessly contrarian or overzealous. Before this it was his attack on aurumxchange over zhoutong.
Matthew has to be overzealous and very rich for the #1 to be likely, is he? Maybe not rich but I don't know of any reason why he would not cover his wager if indeed he was on the payor end of it. Just to be clear, I am not encouraging anyone to make any high risk investments... Do your homework. ;p He is betting maximum of ~100,000 USD , that's a lot of money, e.g. it's a down payment for a house, why wouldn't he cover it indeed /sarcasm |
|
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014
Strength in numbers
|
|
August 22, 2012, 05:51:03 AM |
|
You should never bet if you don't understand.
Here's a hash for later:
c399c874cb47a43291859a37a8f02c1dfe8049dcd26c3c4e7316fb71cd034275
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone. |
|
|
bitcoinBull
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1001
rippleFanatic
|
|
August 22, 2012, 05:56:27 AM |
|
I see #1 as more likely. This is not the first time I've thought an effort of his to be needlessly contrarian or overzealous. Before this it was his attack on aurumxchange over zhoutong.
Matthew has to be overzealous and very rich for the #1 to be likely, is he? Depends on what you mean by "very rich". Given the number of people who gave pirate 5k BTC, there's enough irrational "rich" people. 10k btc is a lot of money to you and me, but I bet that Matthew's parents have a lot more money than mine and yours. |
College of Bucking Bulls Knowledge
|
|
|
|
Serith (OP)
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:10:52 AM |
|
I see #1 as more likely. This is not the first time I've thought an effort of his to be needlessly contrarian or overzealous. Before this it was his attack on aurumxchange over zhoutong.
Matthew has to be overzealous and very rich for the #1 to be likely, is he? Depends on what you mean by "very rich". Given the number of people who gave pirate 5k BTC, there's enough irrational "rich" people. 10k btc is a lot of money to you and me, but I bet that Matthew's parents have a lot more money than mine and yours. Do you believe that Matthew has ~100,000 USD lying around that he can spend all at once? |
|
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:12:05 AM |
|
You should never bet if you don't understand.
Here's a hash for later:
c399c874cb47a43291859a37a8f02c1dfe8049dcd26c3c4e7316fb71cd034275
Witnessed. |
|
|
|
|
dissipate
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:15:37 AM |
|
Do you believe that Matthew has ~100,000 USD lying around that he can spend all at once?
It seems he had plenty of cash to blow on the Ellet. Unless he was able to get some other guys to put cash into that. In any event, the guy is a tool looking for attention and is probably the least professional business person I have ever talked to. |
|
|
|
|
Matthew N. Wright
Untrustworthy
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:17:23 AM |
|
Do you believe that Matthew has ~100,000 USD lying around that he can spend all at once?
It seems he had plenty of cash to blow on the Ellet. Unless he was able to get some other guys to put cash into that. In any event, the guy is a tool looking for attention and is probably the least professional business person I have ever talked to. I wish there were an emoticon for "Jelly". |
|
|
|
bitcats
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1014
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:25:49 AM |
|
Do you believe that Matthew has ~100,000 USD lying around that he can spend all at once?
Sure, why not? I know many people who could. |
"Unser Problem ist nicht ziviler Ungehorsam, unser Problem ist ziviler Gehorsam." - Howard Zinn
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014
Strength in numbers
|
|
August 22, 2012, 06:55:19 AM |
|
You should never bet if you don't understand.
Here's a hash for later:
c399c874cb47a43291859a37a8f02c1dfe8049dcd26c3c4e7316fb71cd034275
Witnessed. Thanks. |
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone. |
|
|
bg002h
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1463
Merit: 1047
I outlived my lifetime membership:)
|
|
August 22, 2012, 12:11:36 PM |
|
You should never bet if you don't understand.
Here's a hash for later:
c399c874cb47a43291859a37a8f02c1dfe8049dcd26c3c4e7316fb71cd034275
Witnessed. Thanks. What is this hash for? It's not in the block chain.... |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz
|
|
August 22, 2012, 12:52:54 PM |
|
You should never bet if you don't understand.
Here's a hash for later:
c399c874cb47a43291859a37a8f02c1dfe8049dcd26c3c4e7316fb71cd034275
Witnessed. Thanks. What is this hash for? It's not in the block chain.... Its like the secret file on Wikileaks  |
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
August 22, 2012, 03:17:07 PM |
|
Do you believe that Matthew has ~100,000 USD lying around that he can spend all at once?
It seems he had plenty of cash to blow on the Ellet. Unless he was able to get some other guys to put cash into that. In any event, the guy is a tool looking for attention and is probably the least professional business person I have ever talked to. I wish there were an emoticon for "Jelly".  |
|
|
|
|
|
