sbogovac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1193
I don't believe in denial.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 18, 2015, 08:07:44 PM |
|
[...]Why did they ask for all the posts that mentioned that term?[...] Only they know. But my guess is - like Muhammed's - they think it wil somehow help them in their investigation of / case against BFL...
|
0x7442A5c37E513D335F53843cD20c00F77eAC7867
|
|
|
sbogovac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1193
I don't believe in denial.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 18, 2015, 08:09:15 PM |
|
[...] when the Government needs any info, it's hard to convince them. [...] Huh... ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) What's you talking about? What does government have to do with this? Did you even read the subpoena (let alone the rest of this thread before posting)? [...]I read that in the first post but my concern was if they want to take any action on the users that just used the terms or they are only interested in the BFL employees-/ex employees posts. Where in the first post does it say anything about government? You assumed it... I assume... ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
0x7442A5c37E513D335F53843cD20c00F77eAC7867
|
|
|
erikalui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 18, 2015, 08:14:14 PM |
|
As you can reed on the first page of the subpoena it were: KYLE ALEXANDER, and DYLAN SYMINGTON of the WOOD LAW FIRM that requested it.
(And if you google WOOD LAW FIRM and BFL together, what do you get...?)
Oh it was a Law Firm. I get this if I Google search it: http://www.woodlaw.com/cases/butterfly-labs-and-bf-labs-inc-bitcoin-minersI assumed it was a Government agency as I just went by the definition and I read the case that the company hasn't lived up to the expectations of their customers and they have many cases issued against them. Thanks for the reply ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 18, 2015, 08:33:29 PM |
|
I'm surprised that BFL is such a small part of the forum. I was about to suggest you should just give them yesterday's forum snapshot ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Jokes aside... What the hell do we have to do with BFL? Why the hell should theymos be forced to lose time gathering all the information these guys need? If they need info, get them yourselves... Don't force your own citizens to work for you for free, gathering old information they have nothing to do about and sending them in if they don't bow to this... Pretty annoying. As for the PM protection... I agree with Blazr. Losing your password would be a feature. But this also should be opt-in, with a big, annoying, one time warning.
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 18, 2015, 08:40:27 PM |
|
I'm surprised that BFL is such a small part of the forum. I was about to suggest you should just give them yesterday's forum snapshot ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Jokes aside... What the hell do we have to do with BFL? Why the hell should theymos be forced to lose time gathering all the information these guys need? If they need info, get them yourselves... Don't force your own citizens to work for you for free, gathering old information they have nothing to do about and sending them in if they don't bow to this... Pretty annoying. As for the PM protection... I agree with Blazr. Losing your password would be a feature. But this also should be opt-in, with a big, annoying, one time warning. I have asked the 'same' thing and this is was the reply from BadBear: Subpoena is a court order, so yes he has to respond (either consent or fight it in court) or he can be jailed.
And yes you should always use PGP or something else for sensitive communications.
I hope they enjoy reading my pm's to Inaba warning him to stop trolling and derailing threads, and him whining about someone else starting it.
I was lucky to have not sent any 'sensitive' pm to any 'member' of BFL team or person related with them.
|
|
|
|
VenusFlyTrap
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
Are you OCD?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 12:12:01 AM |
|
We have been following this for months. Where have you been dude? Look at the other BFL threads.
|
WARNING! SLok is a known user of SilkRoad and SilkRoad 2.0 who used to moderate BFL's forums. Can't get your refund? Email FTC attorney Helen Wong at: hwong [at] ftc.gov Follow the FTC vs. BF Labs court docs: http://tinyurl.com/ftcvsbfl
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 12:38:06 AM |
|
We have been following this for months. Where have you been dude? Look at the other BFL threads. Its hard to when only 1/60 posts is actually about the case, which is CK's point. While there may be some useful content in that old thread, there's so much noise that its untenable to actually find that information in the thread.
|
|
|
|
VenusFlyTrap
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
Are you OCD?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 01:12:39 AM |
|
We have been following this for months. Where have you been dude? Look at the other BFL threads. Its hard to when only 1/60 posts is actually about the case, which is CK's point. While there may be some useful content in that old thread, there's so much noise that its untenable to actually find that information in the thread. Dogie of course you have to say that. Is not as though you contributed anything to the thread. Complaining is easier.
|
WARNING! SLok is a known user of SilkRoad and SilkRoad 2.0 who used to moderate BFL's forums. Can't get your refund? Email FTC attorney Helen Wong at: hwong [at] ftc.gov Follow the FTC vs. BF Labs court docs: http://tinyurl.com/ftcvsbfl
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 01:29:45 AM |
|
We have been following this for months. Where have you been dude? Look at the other BFL threads. Its hard to when only 1/60 posts is actually about the case, which is CK's point. While there may be some useful content in that old thread, there's so much noise that its untenable to actually find that information in the thread. Dogie of course you have to say that. Is not as though you contributed anything to the thread. Complaining is easier. Why do I have to say that? Of course I didn't contribute to that thread, it was unusable and a mess. Not a lot of point investing time into thoughtful discussion there when its going to get buried by PG/GG within 20 seconds.
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 06:10:25 AM |
|
I'm surprised that BFL is such a small part of the forum. I was about to suggest you should just give them yesterday's forum snapshot ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Jokes aside... What the hell do we have to do with BFL? Why the hell should theymos be forced to lose time gathering all the information these guys need? If they need info, get them yourselves... Don't force your own citizens to work for you for free, gathering old information they have nothing to do about and sending them in if they don't bow to this... Pretty annoying. As for the PM protection... I agree with Blazr. Losing your password would be a feature. But this also should be opt-in, with a big, annoying, one time warning. Ignoring scams leads to this. Being proactive could resolve it simply banning BFL in 2012 or 2013 as things escalated. If you don't want to bother doing hours of info collation then eliminate the scammers sooner and permanently. No remorse here this subpoena has happened. It will happen again without any proactive measures by admins.
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 2370
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 06:18:40 AM |
|
I'm surprised that BFL is such a small part of the forum. I was about to suggest you should just give them yesterday's forum snapshot ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Jokes aside... What the hell do we have to do with BFL? Why the hell should theymos be forced to lose time gathering all the information these guys need? If they need info, get them yourselves... Don't force your own citizens to work for you for free, gathering old information they have nothing to do about and sending them in if they don't bow to this... Pretty annoying. As for the PM protection... I agree with Blazr. Losing your password would be a feature. But this also should be opt-in, with a big, annoying, one time warning. Ignoring scams leads to this. Being proactive could resolve it simply banning BFL in 2012 or 2013 as things escalated. If you don't want to bother doing hours of info collation then eliminate the scammers sooner and permanently. No remorse here this subpoena has happened. It will happen again without any proactive measures by admins. Scams are not banned. Unless some other rule was broken during that timeframe (I have no idea if one was, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that one was not) then a ban would not have been appropriate.
|
|
|
|
erikalui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 09:37:42 AM |
|
We have been following this for months. Where have you been dude? Look at the other BFL threads. I was alive but not that alive to read about something I don't know about nor am interested in bro. I dint know the term BFL till this post was created. I can't search every section of this forum to find out what's going on and I don't even know anyone who could tell me about this case. and also it's pretty obvious that what you might know, I might not and vice versa. Not surprising at all. What other BFL thread? Aren't they all deleted? I'm surprised that BFL is such a small part of the forum. I was about to suggest you should just give them yesterday's forum snapshot ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Jokes aside... What the hell do we have to do with BFL? Why the hell should theymos be forced to lose time gathering all the information these guys need? If they need info, get them yourselves... Don't force your own citizens to work for you for free, gathering old information they have nothing to do about and sending them in if they don't bow to this... Pretty annoying. As for the PM protection... I agree with Blazr. Losing your password would be a feature. But this also should be opt-in, with a big, annoying, one time warning. I have asked the 'same' thing and this is was the reply from BadBear: Subpoena is a court order, so yes he has to respond (either consent or fight it in court) or he can be jailed.
And yes you should always use PGP or something else for sensitive communications.
I hope they enjoy reading my pm's to Inaba warning him to stop trolling and derailing threads, and him whining about someone else starting it.
I was lucky to have not sent any 'sensitive' pm to any 'member' of BFL team or person related with them. It's obvious that when there is some legal trouble or a law firm investigating a case, they ask for all other information. Like I can read the OP, it says that most employees of the company were members of this forum. Theymos may be asked to provide everything related to those employees and if he wouldn't do it, it could have appeared as if he is supporting them. That usually is assumed. Glad that he supported them.
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 10:24:45 AM |
|
I'm surprised that BFL is such a small part of the forum. I was about to suggest you should just give them yesterday's forum snapshot ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Jokes aside... What the hell do we have to do with BFL? Why the hell should theymos be forced to lose time gathering all the information these guys need? If they need info, get them yourselves... Don't force your own citizens to work for you for free, gathering old information they have nothing to do about and sending them in if they don't bow to this... Pretty annoying. As for the PM protection... I agree with Blazr. Losing your password would be a feature. But this also should be opt-in, with a big, annoying, one time warning. I have asked the 'same' thing and this is was the reply from BadBear: Subpoena is a court order, so yes he has to respond (either consent or fight it in court) or he can be jailed.
And yes you should always use PGP or something else for sensitive communications.
I hope they enjoy reading my pm's to Inaba warning him to stop trolling and derailing threads, and him whining about someone else starting it.
I was lucky to have not sent any 'sensitive' pm to any 'member' of BFL team or person related with them. Of course he has to respond, that's how their laws are made... But they shouldn't have sent the subpoena in the first place: this is not the BFL forums neither is theymos involved with BFL We shouldn't have to waste time dealing with other people's problems. Being a forum admin doesn't include that responsibility. Or at least it shouldn't. I guess they're just going to ask to all admins of websites where criminals have gone through to release their info ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Ignoring scams leads to this. Being proactive could resolve it simply banning BFL in 2012 or 2013 as things escalated. If you don't want to bother doing hours of info collation then eliminate the scammers sooner and permanently. No remorse here this subpoena has happened. It will happen again without any proactive measures by admins.
Ignoring scams leads to many precedents, which don't really make sense around here, in my opinion. That's why there are forum parts where there are red letters saying that possible scams are not removed. As far as I know, theymos position around here is being neutral (as you can read by his interview posted earlier in the thread). Removing sensitive things doesn't really make him neutral. I think that wouldn't be good for his image and, most importantly, to the image of the forum. Removing things makes admins and mods look like they're on one side of the fence, and I wouldn't like to visit a forum where admins remove things that may (or may not) be a scam. That's up to us to see what's up (and we're a pretty smart community around here)
|
|
|
|
sbogovac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1193
I don't believe in denial.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 10:43:18 AM |
|
[...]
Any normal "rule-of-law" country should have these kind of laws. If a forum provides the ability for people to meet and transact, the both parties should be able to collect enough information to settle disputes (especially if one of those parties is conducting "business" the way BFL has done)... Or would you prefer the "wild west" where the "law of the strongest/richest/cunnyest applies?
|
0x7442A5c37E513D335F53843cD20c00F77eAC7867
|
|
|
DeboraMeeks
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 10:46:14 AM |
|
To prevent this sort of thing happening in future why doesn't theymos cede control of the forum to someone he trusts who lives in Russia or Belize or wherever, and who is willing to ignore such subpoenas?
|
|
|
|
IPO Magic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 01:11:55 PM |
|
I'm surprised that BFL is such a small part of the forum. I was about to suggest you should just give them yesterday's forum snapshot ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Jokes aside... What the hell do we have to do with BFL? Why the hell should theymos be forced to lose time gathering all the information these guys need? If they need info, get them yourselves... Don't force your own citizens to work for you for free, gathering old information they have nothing to do about and sending them in if they don't bow to this... Pretty annoying. As for the PM protection... I agree with Blazr. Losing your password would be a feature. But this also should be opt-in, with a big, annoying, one time warning. Ignoring scams leads to this. Being proactive could resolve it simply banning BFL in 2012 or 2013 as things escalated. If you don't want to bother doing hours of info collation then eliminate the scammers sooner and permanently. No remorse here this subpoena has happened. It will happen again without any proactive measures by admins. Scams are not banned. Unless some other rule was broken during that timeframe (I have no idea if one was, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that one was not) then a ban would not have been appropriate. A disclaimer stating that scams are not banned doesn't absolve the forum from responsibility of being a vehicle for fraud. Scams are banned in US. Theymos is a US citizen, operating from US soil, regardless of where the servers are physically located, and is subject to US law. @DeboraMeeks: And control of $ million + in BTC? Not gonna happen.
|
|
|
|
Blazr
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 02:04:33 PM |
|
A disclaimer stating that scams are not banned doesn't absolve the forum from responsibility of being a vehicle for fraud. By that same logic, if your Bitcoin node relayed a fraudulent transaction it received it would be a vehicle for fraud, therefore it's safe to assume every Bitcoin user running a node is just as guilty as theymos as undoubtedly every Bitcoin node has relayed a fraudulent transaction. Thankfully the law doesn't work that way and there are laws in place designed to protect website owners from the actions of their users, which is why craigslist's owners aren't in jail for the actions of people like the Craigslist Killer.
|
|
|
|
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 03:33:58 PM |
|
To prevent this sort of thing happening in future why doesn't theymos cede control of the forum to someone he trusts who lives in Russia or Belize or wherever, and who is willing to ignore such subpoenas?
Why? It's not the responsibility of theymos to make sure the users of this forum are decent honest people. It's also not his responsibility to protect forum users from the law. He's a forum administrator not a mommy or a nanny. He only has one job duty on this forum and only owes one thing to its membership - keep the forum running. There are a bunch of little jobs inside that one duty like keep the spam down, ban the disruptive people, pay for the hosting, update the software, bla bla. Nowhere in that duty list does it say, keep members from being ripped off and hide them from the law.
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 03:34:46 PM |
|
To prevent this sort of thing happening in future why doesn't theymos cede control of the forum to someone he trusts who lives in Russia or Belize or wherever, and who is willing to ignore such subpoenas?
Because the last entity you want to piss off is the US Government. If you stick your fingers up at them they'll find a way to insert them into you. While we all agree that bitcointalk.org shouldn't have been subject to such sweeping requests for information, there is little reason to start a war over it.
|
|
|
|
sbogovac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1193
I don't believe in denial.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 19, 2015, 03:40:16 PM |
|
A disclaimer stating that scams are not banned doesn't absolve the forum from responsibility of being a vehicle for fraud. By that same logic, if your Bitcoin node relayed a fraudulent transaction it received it would be a vehicle for fraud, therefore it's safe to assume every Bitcoin user running a node is just as guilty as theymos as undoubtedly every Bitcoin node has relayed a fraudulent transaction. Thankfully the law doesn't work that way and there are laws in place designed to protect website owners from the actions of their users, which is why craigslist's owners aren't in jail for the actions of people like the Craigslist Killer. Yes, indeed. Exactly why Craigslist provides infomation to anyone requesting formally; either private/through a lawyer because they've been ripped off or by government LEO's trying to catch criminals...
|
0x7442A5c37E513D335F53843cD20c00F77eAC7867
|
|
|
|