[ANN] [007] Stealth Addresses. PoW Phase. C-CEX/CRYPTSY. Masternodes.

[spartak_t]

It is actually quite common.  You are just upset and it must be clouding your perception. I'm not going to make a list of awful coins but look through the list of coins that are traded on cryptsy and then tell me if you honestly feel the same.  I mean ffs they still trade ripoffcoin, and that isn't a a bad thing, but it should help you realize that this is not a new phenomenon.  anyway, sorry for your loss, I am not trying to defend cryptsy, I was just trying to point out that being listed there is in no way an endorsement and therefore blaming them is from my point of view makes no sense.

Oh, no.. this is not the case. You are right that I am upset, but it is not because my investment (which is about 0.2 BTC - realized that it will be better to buy than mine), it is because of the many scams and other people as well. I have been f* up several times and don't mind to take it again, but there are people, which can't recover or don't have the abilities to make a ROI from other coins.

Like I said - this is not the case with 007. This is different.

Glad that you mentioned RipOff though. I was 101% sure that they will fail, but you know what? Thouse guys were actually good and honest (at least a friend of mine told me so and I trust him). With that said - this is not a good example. How about Galaxycoin? At least RipOff has still working block explorer and such. GLX is only on Cryptsy (and I think CoinWarz). I'm sure that I can find at least 5 more coins which are like GLX, but they are still "traded" on Cryptsy.

[tyz]

The poker application looks good. When is it planned to be released? You should release it before Pangea Poker is released (which is currently in early beta state).

[HKBvM]

The poker application looks good. When is it planned to be released? You should release it before Pangea Poker is released (which is currently in early beta state).

The poker application looks good. When is it planned to be released? You should release it before Pangea Poker is released (which is currently in early beta state).

Never probably. TBH I dont know what all the hype about poker is. It is an economy that is on a downtrend since around 2008. Many sites are struggling or have merged. If you dont play NLH as your main game you pretty much have one site only with decent enough traffic if you want to leave microstakes (stars).

We have a bitcoin poker site already since 3 years or so, traffic was more or less laughable. Why on earth would this site - if it ever launched - have more success. No one could seriously play on an anonymous poker site anyway as - unless I miss something - there would be no way to prevent multiaccounting or collusion which totally kills the game if you are not playing for pennies.

Pangea Poker. I should probably read about this a bit more (and I will), but I can guarantee you that 99% of poker players will not give a f if it is decentralised or not. It is about rake, security and traffic. Heck, I am happily paying taxes on my winnings if I can play legally and I dont have to worry about my money getting lost over night (I am talking about more than 20k USD, so security is a biiiig concern for me).

Btw: this is what happened to the guy running swc: http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/las-vegas/nevada-ag-charges-online-poker-operator-who-used-bitcoin.

Maybe I am wrong on this or too pessimistic or I simply dont know about solutions to the above problems, but if you put your hopes to save a struggling economy (crypto) through an economy that struggles even more (poker), that doesnt sound like a plan to me.

[OneandOnly22]

where is dev? where is casino launch?

[Lore06]

Dev is on a nice vacation with ICO funds.

[russokito]

where is dev? where is casino launch?

[Levole11]

where is dev? where is casino launch?

Another scam, brought to you by C-Cex

[PhilipMorris]

My god. C-cex released all the ICO funds allready?

[spartak_t]

My god. C-cex released all the ICO funds allready?

Don't know, but I'm not surprised.

[placebo]

where is dev? where is casino launch?

Terrible...

[HKBvM]

where is dev? where is casino launch?

Terrible...

yet another scam, placebo. And you keep promoting ICOs like nothing ever happened and will continue to do so.

[placebo]

where is dev? where is casino launch?

Terrible...

yet another scam, placebo. And you keep promoting ICOs like nothing ever happened and will continue to do so.

The concept of ICO is not bad, look what happened with bT (no premine, no ICO), i mean if dev is a scammer, then it can be whatever you want, they will scam you always. Perfect example was the BT lucky hidden blocks, there should only be 24M coins and it now they are almost 50M coins, so this so called no premine/ no ico coin was a scam of BT dev for i don't know, maybe 40 - 50 BTC.

The C-CEX ICO are not bad, why? you can buy your ICO coins, and dump it in the same week, and you can play on the pump. I bought 007 for a nice amount of coins during ICO and i made 40% profit, so for me this coin was not a bad investment, but it is like a lot of the times in crypto world, a lot of coins are scam or if they are not scam then they never hit a exchange, think of it. Why is it scam? Is it DEV that is scam? Or maybe you need to think of a group of people with a lot of BTC that just launch coins every 5 mins and then create a massive pump and dump everything.

[tyz]

This was predictable. The dev made a good business and disappeared with the funds. It is the common scheme of the most new ICO coins. Sad developement in my eyes 

[HKBvM]

where is dev? where is casino launch?

Terrible...

yet another scam, placebo. And you keep promoting ICOs like nothing ever happened and will continue to do so.

The concept of ICO is not bad, look what happened with bT (no premine, no ICO), i mean if dev is a scammer, then it can be whatever you want, they will scam you always. Perfect example was the BT lucky hidden blocks, there should only be 24M coins and it now they are almost 50M coins, so this so called no premine/ no ico coin was a scam of BT dev for i don't know, maybe 40 - 50 BTC.

The C-CEX ICO are not bad, why? you can buy your ICO coins, and dump it in the same week, and you can play on the pump. I bought 007 for a nice amount of coins during ICO and i made 40% profit, so for me this coin was not a bad investment, but it is like a lot of the times in crypto world, a lot of coins are scam or if they are not scam then they never hit a exchange, think of it. Why is it scam? Is it DEV that is scam? Or maybe you need to think of a group of people with a lot of BTC that just launch coins every 5 mins and then create a massive pump and dump everything.

Just because we have scams that are no ICOs, doesnt mean ICOs are any good, thats just relativization. ICOs in fact have made the situation far worse. Last summer or so people were not accepting coins with a bigger premine than 2% or so, now we have premines in unknown height via self-buys and buys from friends/grandmother and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. I would bet that at least 90% of all ICOs had devs buying into their own coin, some were even naive enough to admit it later. Heck, they didnt even see why they did something wrong (completely illegal in any regulated market).

Of course if a "dev" wants to scam he has many ways (hidden blocks etc), he doesnt need an ICO, but ICOs have made it far far worse and much easier for those "devs". The idea is good, it is just not working in unregulated markets like crypto.

I know that you know how to play those ICO coins. I have myself bought in so many of those and came out with a profit most of the time and will probably continue to do so. It still sucks and I know that makes me a hypocrite pretty much. I like money.

EMC2 has some kind of mining tax. That way you could have constant funding without a premine up front or an ICO that makes scamming super easy. For some odd reason no other coin has that concept, wonder why (works with POW only oc)?

[spartak_t]

...

I like how you are thinking.

P.S. "Dev", you are joke. Cryptsy, BIG BLACK DOT from me.

[mullick]

The reason I chose to list 007 coin was the terms of the ICO.

The ICO funds were to be placed as buy orders so anyone can exit their position at the ICO price for 2 weeks.

I didnt see how buying up the ICO could benefit the developer. Ill do better due diligence next time

[iqlimasyadiqa]

where DEV ?

Are you healhty ?
If not , i hope yu dead and go to hell

[placebo]

The reason I chose to list 007 coin was the terms of the ICO.

The ICO funds were to be placed as buy orders so anyone can exit their position at the ICO price for 2 weeks.

I didnt see how buying up the ICO could benefit the developer. Ill do better due diligence next time

Honestly, i don't think Cryptsy can be blamed here...If you check how many DEVs leave their coin. Cryptsy took the right steps in my eyes, as 007 really had some interesting feautures planned and was trading pretty heavily. When a ICO is sold in 48 mins, then i would also add it to my exchange, honestly.

[Melech]

The ICO funds were to be placed as buy orders so anyone can exit their position at the ICO price for 2 weeks.

Try 5 days. (though you added it on the 23rd?  after a single day!)

All the signs of a scam were there...  

Large premine with promise of websites, "coming soon(tm)".

Coin created by (coinname), with a single github commit.  Never branched from bitcoin to show history.  It's the same guy who makes 99% of these scam coins...

Use of copyrighted images.

As another user pointed out... this coin was created for the purpose of gambling, which is illegal in Florida...

The guy didn't even bother to shell out $5 for a dns name for the block explorer, etc...

The fact that some new, unknown coin, sold 70BTC in 48 minutes *IS* a red flag!

looks legit? lol

Even managed to skip the voting list on Cryptsy... classy

[spartak_t]

Honestly, i don't think Cryptsy can be blamed here...If you check how many DEVs leave their coin. Cryptsy took the right steps in my eyes, as 007 really had some interesting feautures planned and was trading pretty heavily. When a ICO is sold in 48 mins, then i would also add it to my exchange, honestly.

Of course they can be blamed. Cryptsy was exchange on which it was pretty difficult to be listed. In my eyes, the coin was somehow legit just because they listed it. I though that "the dev" proved something to them. Don't really know how much BTC were gathered and I think that the volume wasn't that great to attract attention of bigger exchanges. They can't be blamed for listing coins with big volume, because they exist because of that - volume, but imho this is not the case here.

P.S. placebo, you are cancer to cryptocurrencies. All you care is make an ICO, take % of it, sell at profit and move to another. Don't know in how many ICO's you were involved, but I think that 100% of them are either scam or completely disaster. While I find normal people to gather funds for developing (yes, I can understand ICO's and somehow approve them.. nobody is working for free), I don't like you attitude.