YoBit.Net - Signature Campaign - Realtime Payouts (daily)

[155UE]

I think i'm in but i'm confused

If you see your uid in the bot then it means you are in and you should check the dialog box on what it shows when you registered

[Cyaren]

I think i'm in but i'm confused

if you're in, it'll tell you your number of posts at forum right now, and say UID added. Then it'll say status active.

If not, it'll say inactive, and you have to contact support.

[mettalmag]

what about the avatar campaign ?
It would be great though to add avatar campaign too

[arbitrage]

hi ? everyone?
i have received  negative trust from hilariousandco. because  i do not manage well our campaign .
so, i will  try to manage more efficiently.
if you someone  post  the spam, tell me  the user. after i check the user,  i will remove him from our campaign.

How about you go through your campaign and kick spammers off instead of relying on me or others to tell you about them? It's your job to do this not everybody else. This campagn is widely known and has a bad reputation for the poor posts its users make and I'm not sure why you want that associated with your business. It's only got that reputation because you don't do anything but pay people regardless of quality so that's why there's countless people making poor quality posts day after day. Stop paying poor quality posters and get on top of your campaign and I will gladly remove the feedback but your campaign cannot continue as it is.

This is from another signature campaign. (Make Your own conclusion!)

I must appeal to whole Youbit community especially those who are wearing signatures to increase quality of posts or we can face same "situation" here very soon. Spam became very serious problem here and moderators will react accordingly.

[Lutpin]

-snip-

How about you go through your campaign and kick spammers off instead of relying on me or others to tell you about them? It's your job to do this not everybody else. This campagn is widely known and has a bad reputation for the poor posts its users make and I'm not sure why you want that associated with your business. It's only got that reputation because you don't do anything but pay people regardless of quality so that's why there's countless people making poor quality posts day after day. Stop paying poor quality posters and get on top of your campaign and I will gladly remove the feedback but your campaign cannot continue as it is.

This is from another signature campaign. (Make Your own conclusion!)
I must appeal to whole Youbit community especially those who are wearing signatures to increase quality of posts or we can face same "situation" here very soon. Spam became very serious problem here and moderators will react accordingly.

Fun fact, the user/global moderator you quote up there (hilariousandco) has already been hired by YoBit to overlook the campaign.

[arbitrage]

-snip-

-snip-

-snip-

Fun fact, the user/global moderator you quote up there (hilariousandco) has already been hired by YoBit to overlook the campaign.

And what conclusion he had about this champaign?
I didn't know this fact at all. Do you have some references, links?

[Lutpin]

And what conclusion he had about this champaign?
I didn't know this fact at all. Do you have some references, links?

You're still part of the campaign, probably speaks for you. More I can't tell you about his conclusions. You'd have to ask him yourself.
As for references, start with the quote from hilarious in the OP of this thread.

[arbitrage]

And what conclusion he had about this champaign?
I didn't know this fact at all. Do you have some references, links?

Your still part of the campaign, probably speaks for you. More I can't tell you about his conclusions. You'd have to ask him yourself.
As for references, start with the quote from hilarious in the OP of this thread.

I'm trying to be more constructive here. You probably know about this more then me because this is also part of your job.
I respect your work as manager of few campaigns. (Yes i'm a part of this campaign but also saw small decrease in quality..)

[Aamir1]

hi ? everyone?
i have received  negative trust from hilariousandco. because  i do not manage well our campaign .
so, i will  try to manage more efficiently.
if you someone  post  the spam, tell me  the user. after i check the user,  i will remove him from our campaign.

How about you go through your campaign and kick spammers off instead of relying on me or others to tell you about them? It's your job to do this not everybody else. This campagn is widely known and has a bad reputation for the poor posts its users make and I'm not sure why you want that associated with your business. It's only got that reputation because you don't do anything but pay people regardless of quality so that's why there's countless people making poor quality posts day after day. Stop paying poor quality posters and get on top of your campaign and I will gladly remove the feedback but your campaign cannot continue as it is.

This is from another signature campaign. (Make Your own conclusion!)

I must appeal to whole Youbit community especially those who are wearing signatures to increase quality of posts or we can face same "situation" here very soon. Spam became very serious problem here and moderators will react accordingly.

I have been thinking about the same thing for this campaign too. I'm always thinking that today or tomorrow campaign moderator will say the same thing to us about poor quality posts, but thankfully we haven't face it yet, but you are right. This can happen any time, as there are too many users on this campaign who post nothing but shit for just increasing their post count in the campaign earnings.

[Miiike]

I have been thinking about the same thing for this campaign too. I'm always thinking that today or tomorrow campaign moderator will say the same thing to us about poor quality posts, but thankfully we haven't face it yet, but you are right. This can happen any time, as there are too many users on this campaign who post nothing but shit for just increasing their post count in the campaign earnings.

Hi, I came from that "another signature campaign" and I think its fair enough to say that hilariousandco's decision create quite a stir on our thread. But surprisingly I found it is necessary because we are also aware that there are a lot of spammers on the signature and we got a slow but sure impact from those spammers that numbers keep growing.
And to share you my thought, I actually think yobit is also vulnerable for forced-spamers-cleaning action from any moderators because yobit also accept new participants without considering their posts beforehand.

[Aamir1]

I have been thinking about the same thing for this campaign too. I'm always thinking that today or tomorrow campaign moderator will say the same thing to us about poor quality posts, but thankfully we haven't face it yet, but you are right. This can happen any time, as there are too many users on this campaign who post nothing but shit for just increasing their post count in the campaign earnings.

Hi, I came from that "another signature campaign" and I think its fair enough to say that hilariousandco's decision create quite a stir on our thread. But surprisingly I found it is necessary because we are also aware that there are a lot of spammers on the signature and we got a slow but sure impact from those spammers that numbers keep growing.
And to share you my thought, I actually think yobit is also vulnerable for forced-spamers-cleaning action from any moderators because yobit also accept new participants without considering their posts beforehand.

Yes, yobit sig campaign managers should also do something against spammers that are earning for their meaningless posts everywhere on the forum, campaigns should be cleaned and should have no spammers so that no one say that sig campaigns are bad for the forum.

[leowonderful]

I have been thinking about the same thing for this campaign too. I'm always thinking that today or tomorrow campaign moderator will say the same thing to us about poor quality posts, but thankfully we haven't face it yet, but you are right. This can happen any time, as there are too many users on this campaign who post nothing but shit for just increasing their post count in the campaign earnings.

Hi, I came from that "another signature campaign" and I think its fair enough to say that hilariousandco's decision create quite a stir on our thread. But surprisingly I found it is necessary because we are also aware that there are a lot of spammers on the signature and we got a slow but sure impact from those spammers that numbers keep growing.
And to share you my thought, I actually think yobit is also vulnerable for forced-spamers-cleaning action from any moderators because yobit also accept new participants without considering their posts beforehand.

Yes, yobit sig campaign managers should also do something against spammers that are earning for their meaningless posts everywhere on the forum, campaigns should be cleaned and should have no spammers so that no one say that sig campaigns are bad for the forum.

Yobit is both good and bad. Yobit offers new members a way to earn some bitcoin for quality posts without the hassle of waiting sometimes days and days just to get into a signature campaign. The bad news is that spammers are indeed flooding the campaign and now the yobit signature is somewhat looked down upon. Mods of this campaign should consider posts before and after joining the campaign, but still letting people join automatically. That way the versatility of the campaign still exists but spammers will be removed quickly and efficiently.

[Aamir1]

Yobit is both good and bad. Yobit offers new members a way to earn some bitcoin for quality posts without the hassle of waiting sometimes days and days just to get into a signature campaign. The bad news is that spammers are indeed flooding the campaign and now the yobit signature is somewhat looked down upon. Mods of this campaign should consider posts before and after joining the campaign, but still letting people join automatically. That way the versatility of the campaign still exists but spammers will be removed quickly and efficiently.

Removing spammers will make the campaign much better, now a days many senior and other higher rank users are saying that yobit sig campaign is full of shit and spammers who are posting meaningless posts everywhere, and this is not good for the reputation of this campaign. I hope managers of this campaign will soon take some action against spammers in the campaign and will ban them so we won't be able to listen more bad things about this campaign.

[poptok1]

You guys talk about those spammers and yet i dint encounter any and im spendin quite a lot of time on the forum.
Some one mentioned spambots, havent seen that as well. Where can i find those spam posts?

[Aamir1]

You guys talk about those spammers and yet i dint encounter any and im spendin quite a lot of time on the forum.
Some one mentioned spambots, havent seen that as well. Where can i find those spam posts?

There are a lot, just check every section and you will find, users with just 2 or 3 letter posts or just 1 letter sometimes, they are considered spam posts.
I'm sure you will find a lot if you see quite every section of the forum. And i haven't heard about that spambot yet.

[Miiike]

You guys talk about those spammers and yet i dint encounter any and im spendin quite a lot of time on the forum.
Some one mentioned spambots, havent seen that as well. Where can i find those spam posts?

How a post is considered spamming is debatable, if there's anybody here that can describe about how does a post considered spam, I would like to listen because I too didn't know how does a spam measured. But I do know that a non-constructive post can lead you into trouble or make you end up being kicked from any campaign. Here's one good example of non constructive user https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=70247;sa=showPosts
If you like, you could also see mexxer-2 signature, s/he has a link of spammer list

[Aamir1]

You guys talk about those spammers and yet i dint encounter any and im spendin quite a lot of time on the forum.
Some one mentioned spambots, havent seen that as well. Where can i find those spam posts?

How a post is considered spamming is debatable, if there's anybody here that can describe about how does a post considered spam, I would like to listen because I too didn't know how does a spam measured. But I do know that a non-constructive post can lead you into trouble or make you end up being kicked from any campaign. Here's one good example of non constructive user https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=70247;sa=showPosts
If you like, you could also see mexxer-2 signature, s/he has a link of spammer list

A post with just 2 or 3 letters is considered a clear spam, actually not only 2 or 3 letters but less then 10 letters because it is obvious that someone cannot do a constructive post with less then 10 letters,and also as you said off-topic posts are also considered in that way, whether your post is constructive or 4 lines long but if it is off-topic it means it is meanless and considered spamming. If a user keep posting those spam posts like "thanks , sorry, hi" etc, he/she should be banned from campaigns, in that way campaigns will always be clear of spammers.

[BTCforJoe]

I think a great fix/solution to spam posts are to do a manual review of the users' posts every time they request that their earnings in YoBit be transferred to their balance. Maybe set a threshold on the request amount so they have to hit a certain amount for a minimum so that members aren't requesting after every post. Members with spammy posts can get the rewards for those posts deducted from their transfer total, and repeat violators should be suspended for, I don't know, a 72-hour period or so. Repeat violators of the spam posts can be banned from the sig campaign.

I know that this introduces quite a few man-hours for a manual review process, but there should also be an (internal) option on YoBit that allows the reviewer to green-light an account of a member that posts constructively, thus allowing for automatic transfers to their balance upon requests.

Otherwise, I've reported spammy posts to moderators by clicking on the "Report to moderator" links at the bottom of their posts, and have used the reason "ref spam" or "sig spam" when submitting my report. I'm not sure if this affects your sig campaign after your posts have already been reported to YoBit, but I think it would be good audit sig campaigners' accounts to make sure that they are not posting irrelevant or spammy content throughout the forums.

Just my $0.02.

[Aamir1]

I think a great fix/solution to spam posts are to do a manual review of the users' posts every time they request that their earnings in YoBit be transferred to their balance. Maybe set a threshold on the request amount so they have to hit a certain amount for a minimum so that members aren't requesting after every post. Members with spammy posts can get the rewards for those posts deducted from their transfer total, and repeat violators should be suspended for, I don't know, a 72-hour period or so. Repeat violators of the spam posts can be banned from the sig campaign.

I know that this introduces quite a few man-hours for a manual review process, but there should also be an (internal) option on YoBit that allows the reviewer to green-light an account of a member that posts constructively, thus allowing for automatic transfers to their balance upon requests.

Otherwise, I've reported spammy posts to moderators by clicking on the "Report to moderator" links at the bottom of their posts, and have used the reason "ref spam" or "sig spam" when submitting my report. I'm not sure if this affects your sig campaign after your posts have already been reported to YoBit, but I think it would be good audit sig campaigners' accounts to make sure that they are not posting irrelevant or spammy content throughout the forums.

Just my $0.02.

This is not a bad idea actually. If all what you said is done then this campaign will be spam free and there will be no spammers anymore, but it needs a lot of time and effort for doing so and i don't think the admin or the managers of the campaign are free enough to do so, maybe they should hire some other trusted and free users to do it for them.

[valta4065]

You guys talk about those spammers and yet i dint encounter any and im spendin quite a lot of time on the forum.
Some one mentioned spambots, havent seen that as well. Where can i find those spam posts?

How a post is considered spamming is debatable, if there's anybody here that can describe about how does a post considered spam, I would like to listen because I too didn't know how does a spam measured. But I do know that a non-constructive post can lead you into trouble or make you end up being kicked from any campaign. Here's one good example of non constructive user https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=70247;sa=showPosts
If you like, you could also see mexxer-2 signature, s/he has a link of spammer list

A post with just 2 or 3 letters is considered a clear spam, actually not only 2 or 3 letters but less then 10 letters because it is obvious that someone cannot do a constructive post with less then 10 letters,and also as you said off-topic posts are also considered in that way, whether your post is constructive or 4 lines long but if it is off-topic it means it is meanless and considered spamming. If a user keep posting those spam posts like "thanks , sorry, hi" etc, he/she should be banned from campaigns, in that way campaigns will always be clear of spammers.

Yeah but this is being corrected. Those off topic threads are banned now so all this posts no longer exist