[ANN][UNIT] Universal Currency | LIFETIME| POW/POS SHA256 |

[redpepper]

Dev gone? Price falling back old prices before block halving

unitcoin backup by solarfarm project https://asset.cryptomining.farm/asset-cell (about project : https://youtu.be/zharb3t1tEk)

unitcoin never success if solarfarm project can't start phase 1
need more investor to invest on solarfarm project

Tokens sold : 2571689 CELL
Tokens Left : 7428311 CELL (Phase 1/1)
https://c-cex.com/?p=cell-btc
https://asset.cryptomining.farm/buy

This solarfarm thing looks like a ponzi scheme. If you are asking people to buy shares in a business, then at least present a real business plan.  There are too many questions.  Who are the faces behind this?  Where will the SolarFarm be located? What are the costs? What are the risks? Who is engineering the farm?  What third parties have reviewed the business plan? ...

The unitcoin wallet is real nice and the POS works great, but if unit will only succeed on the back of this SolarFarm, then I call unit dead.

What is your backup plan?

don't like scam , ponzi ...
please read https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=917737.0
have someone already confirmed me

What is your backup plan?

i have cloud vps, A-Z voip route can accept unit
wait for coinpayments.net to add unit

Your facebook photos look real, seaming like you are really trying to do it.  But I'm still having a hard time following your business plan, except for; buy cell and get dividends.  Investors need more details than just that.

[TrevorS]

I see no indication in the UNIT description and roadmap that UNIT support and progress is in any way dependent on solarfarm progress.  This is something that is being dumped on us now.  Why should I even consider investing in your solarfarm project if UNIT isn't getting the support we were told it would get?  Is there anything at all about this whole thing that doesn't stink of scam?

https://forum.cryptomining.farm/index.php?topic=3.msg67#msg67

[redpepper]

I see no indication in the UNIT description and roadmap that UNIT support and progress is in any way dependent on solarfarm progress.  This is something that is being dumped on us now.  Why should I even consider investing in your solarfarm project if UNIT isn't getting the support we were told it would get?  Is there anything at all about this whole thing that doesn't stink of scam?

https://forum.cryptomining.farm/index.php?topic=3.msg67#msg67

It was the Dev that first made mention of solarfarm.  He/she has yet to give much explanation.  If solarfarm is not a full on scam, it sure has poor execution, leaving a whole stack of questions in my mind.

You are right, there is no mention of solarfarm, or a tie to it in the description and roadmap.

Dev, can you just stick with your plan?

[AliassailA]

I think a lot of negative feedback sometimes psychologically depresses a dev making a dev leave the project early. Common we eat them alive sometimes. This is what new bitcoin miners/users look at when they google it up. If you are indeed working on your projects then don't get discouraged!! Keep it up and you can profit from this low if your smart

But if your not. I will be watching

[redpepper]

I think a lot of negative feedback sometimes psychologically depresses a dev making a dev leave the project early. Common we eat them alive sometimes. This is what new bitcoin miners/users look at when they google it up. If you are indeed working on your projects then don't get discouraged!! Keep it up and you can profit from this low if your smart

But if your not. I will be watching

Negative feedback is the most valuable type.  I want this coin to succeed, so I'm not going to suppress what I see or question just because it could discourage someone.  If the dev is discouraged that easily, I want to know.

The initial start of this coin was great.  I'm not concerned with the price drop. It started to get funky with the solar farm tie in.  I've still got outstanding questions about it.  The dev should simply take the feedback received and clarify where needed.

[myfirst]

I disagree with the idea that negative feedback is 'valuable'.  Constructive feedback/criticism whether it be negative or positive is more meaningful than someone mindlessly calling everything a scam.

Also, keep in mind that there was no premine and instamine for this

Code:

int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
 
    if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 100)
    {
        nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
    }
        else if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 >= 101  && pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 210101)
    {
        nSubsidy = 100 * COIN;
    }
        else if(pindexBest->nHeight+1 >= 210102)
    {
        nSubsidy = 5 * COIN;
    }
      
    if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
        printf("GetProofOfWorkReward() : create=%s nSubsidy=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nSubsidy);

    return nSubsidy + nFees;
}

The developer is basically doing this for free and maybe buying some of his own coins at these low prices too.
He's obviously investing time and money, is it too much to ask everyone else to put in just a little bit too?

This isn't your common Ninja Launch/Mine & Dump pyramid like everyone else is busy falling for.

[redpepper]

I disagree with the idea that negative feedback is 'valuable'.  Constructive feedback/criticism whether it be negative or positive is more meaningful than someone mindlessly calling everything a scam.

I don't see anyone calling UNIT a scam.  It's solarfarm that is in question.  I don't classify mindless talk as "negative feedback".  It's just noise that should be ignored.  I personally learn much more by listening to what people don't like and what they have problems with, than I do from receiving praise.  This is why I say negative feedback is more valuable and shouldn't restricted.

Dev gone? Price falling back old prices before block halving

unitcoin backup by solarfarm project https://asset.cryptomining.farm/asset-cell (about project : https://youtu.be/zharb3t1tEk)

unitcoin never success if solarfarm project can't start phase 1
need more investor to invest on solarfarm project

Tokens sold : 2571689 CELL
Tokens Left : 7428311 CELL (Phase 1/1)
https://c-cex.com/?p=cell-btc
https://asset.cryptomining.farm/buy

It's the dev that is bringing in solarfarm and I question why.  I've tried to understand by watching the video and reading the website, but I don't get it.  It looks extremely fishy to me.  I've been waiting for the dev to give more explanation than what he/she has said above. 

[lootz]

I think a lot of negative feedback sometimes psychologically depresses a dev making a dev leave the project early. Common we eat them alive sometimes. This is what new bitcoin miners/users look at when they google it up. If you are indeed working on your projects then don't get discouraged!! Keep it up and you can profit from this low if your smart

But if your not. I will be watching

Agreed let the dev work, believe.... dont believe. These are your choices.

[redpepper]

UNIT was number one on the public coinpayments.net vote, now it's not even on the list.  What's up with that?

https://www.coinpayments.net/vote

[carboncredit]

UNIT was number one on the public coinpayments.net vote, now it's not even on the list.  What's up with that?

https://www.coinpayments.net/vote

coinpayments need rank <250 on coinmarketcap

[Snovell]

UNIT was number one on the public coinpayments.net vote, now it's not even on the list.  What's up with that?

https://www.coinpayments.net/vote

coinpayments need rank <250 on coinmarketcap

Fulfill roadmap and people will trust you and price will climb

[WOLTAN78]

And the famous plan B 

[carboncredit]

Please vote unit on payment gateway


Global Coin Payment
btc : 1KsUt2zfqZXFXb7dNEzifiEBXkxkjRo6F4 unit : PUGDPr5KfgDzEpsVE8Cjnk5BpfhRZpZ2aV
0.0004btc or 50unit = 1 vote
https://gourl.io/coin-voting.html

Coin Payment
btc : https://www.coinpayments.net/vote unit : P9MgxPX9CfyX55YrpUJv6gbu61tAug9j2J
0.001btc or 130unit = 1 vote
https://www.coinpayments.net/vote

*unit from vote don't sell on exchange

Coinpayment
3 vote from tx id : b6d9e6517920f5135e45f979848bd5c1110b0ec86c1e22fe69060d6a489f7e55
8 vote from tx id : d34952f46de6f0252e76e298d444335e54f2caca02518eab9f5187b3e4c83074

Gourl
1 vote from tx id : 8548552894c7c44e21a5a007eaa01a2af2f13172dfb33284fe105b0bd360fd88
20 vote from tx id : cd264397c91bb4558c1246bc0911f7764eb9c1b1813391d233d3d16d5d05e963

[redpepper]

UNIT was number one on the public coinpayments.net vote, now it's not even on the list.  What's up with that?

https://www.coinpayments.net/vote

coinpayments need rank <250 on coinmarketcap

It's back now and in 2nd place.

[carboncredit]

Change roadmap


- remove ANON TX
- remove trade on wallet
- join Debitcard system for online wallet, mobile app

[carboncredit]

NXT Asset for invest on UNIT Debit card system
get % shares from fee

https://asset.cryptomining.farm/asset-fee

[irwanjabryg]

NXT Asset for invest on UNIT Debit card system
get % shares from fee

https://asset.cryptomining.farm/asset-fee

What's wrong with the unit price  
back again to 50 SATS 

[tuaris]

What's wrong with the unit price  

Seems like someone couldn't wait anymore (or got scared from Bitrex's de-listing warning) and decided to exit. He or she sold off their holdings and filled all the buy orders, an action they will forever regret.  The Block explorer confirms this.

According to the sell orders, the price is still in the ~300 range.  The buy orders will recover soon.

back again to 50 SATS  

It didn't drop that low.  67 was the lowest.

[masterblu]

Any update from dev?

[myfirst]

Any update from dev?

He may not say much, but at least he's still around.  That's more than can be said for 90% of the other altcoins.