About Activity| How it could be possible

[GregH37]

How that could be possible that an account that is created in march 2014 has more than 400 activity?

Referring to this:

When did you make the account? what year and what month?

March 2014

How it could be possible that an account made in March 2014 is Now reached 400 activity? I think its not possible.
14 points per 2 weeks

So its More than 58 week and more than 1 year will took t reach that activity.

Actually, it's at 434 activity : ).

Anyways, It's sold and awaiting escrow : )

How it could be possible that an account that is made in March 2014 has 434 activity? I couldnt understand Now activity. I thought I know about this activity thing lol

[1714679565]

1714679565

[1714679565]

1714679565

[redsn0w]

I think it is possible, if we count from the 1st March of 2014 to now (1st May of 2015)... we obtain = 436 days. 1 activity point * day, so the account has 434 as activity (there is not wrong in that situation).


31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

[TaxPreparation]

I think it is possible, if we count from the 1st March of 2014 to now (1st May of 2015)... we obtain = 436 days. 1 activity point * day, so the account has 434 as activity (there is not wrong in that situation).


31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

When I re-added it again, it has been about 30 activity increases from the time being, therefore it is legitimately 434.

[shorena]

I think it is possible, if we count from the 1st March of 2014 to now (1st May of 2015)... we obtain = 436 days. 1 activity point * day, so the account has 434 as activity (there is not wrong in that situation).


31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

You dont get 14 activity per week, you get 14 time points per 14 day period.

Considering that the account is from March 1st their first activity period would have started Feb. 18th 2014 (unix time: 1392710000). With the current period included thats 33 periods * 14 = 462 possibly activity. Assuming they posted in every single period. A single post tomorrow would add another 14 time points.

[redsn0w]

I think it is possible, if we count from the 1st March of 2014 to now (1st May of 2015)... we obtain = 436 days. 1 activity point * day, so the account has 434 as activity (there is not wrong in that situation).


31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

You dont get 14 activity per week, you get 14 time points per 14 day period.

Considering that the account is from March 1st their first activity period would have started Feb. 18th 2014 (unix time: 1392710000). With the current period included thats 33 periods * 14 = 462 possibly activity. Assuming they posted in every single period. A single post tomorrow would add another 14 time points.

1 Activity point * day , so it is basically 1 point per day max 14 points each 2 weeks (if you post at least one post every day). This is how the activity works (in the easiest way) but you are right "you will collect those 14 points after the 14 days".

[shorena]

-snip-
1 Activity point * day , so it is basically 1 point per day max 14 points each 2 weeks (if you post at least one post every day). This is how the activity works (in the easiest way).

Its still 14 time points in 14 days, not in 7 days. Besides the simplification of 1 activity per day is wrong in certain cases. E.g. an account created today would get possibly 28 points for the next 15 days. I think most confusions about how activity works is that people do not see the difference between time points and activity.

[redsn0w]

-snip-
1 Activity point * day , so it is basically 1 point per day max 14 points each 2 weeks (if you post at least one post every day). This is how the activity works (in the easiest way).

Its still 14 time points in 14 days, not in 7 days. Besides the simplification of 1 activity per day is wrong in certain cases. E.g. an account created today would get possibly 28 points for the next 15 days. I think most confusions about how activity works is that people do not see the difference between time points and activity.

I didn't talk of 7 days, but yes you are right . It is a really big confusion the activity system, maybe less time we are thinking of it and less trouble we will have.

[tspacepilot]

-snip-
1 Activity point * day , so it is basically 1 point per day max 14 points each 2 weeks (if you post at least one post every day). This is how the activity works (in the easiest way).

Its still 14 time points in 14 days, not in 7 days. Besides the simplification of 1 activity per day is wrong in certain cases. E.g. an account created today would get possibly 28 points for the next 15 days. I think most confusions about how activity works is that people do not see the difference between time points and activity.

Long run average is still 1 point per day.  Ie, someone who maxes out points each time period will have activity which asymptotically approaches 1/day.  But you're absolutely correct the actual figure can vary by +/- 14 based on which day of the time period the account was created on.

[shorena]

-snip-
I didn't talk of 7 days, but yes you are right . It is a really big confusion the activity system, maybe less time we are thinking of it and less trouble we will have.

Looked like it

-snip-
31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

[redsn0w]

-snip-
I didn't talk of 7 days, but yes you are right . It is a really big confusion the activity system, maybe less time we are thinking of it and less trouble we will have.

Looked like it

-snip-
31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

From the first of march 2014  to 11 of may 2015 : 436 days  ... 434 days (his activity) / 14 activity points = 31 weeks   Maybe I can't explain my thought.

[Muhammed Zakir]

-snip-
I didn't talk of 7 days, but yes you are right . It is a really big confusion the activity system, maybe less time we are thinking of it and less trouble we will have.

Looked like it

-snip-
31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

From the first of march 2014  to 11 of may 2015 : 436 days  ... 434 days (his activity) / 14 activity points = 31 weeks   Maybe I can't explain my thought.

I might be wrong but it is actually 62 weeks as 14 days is 2 weeks not 1 week.

[redsn0w]

-snip-
I didn't talk of 7 days, but yes you are right . It is a really big confusion the activity system, maybe less time we are thinking of it and less trouble we will have.

Looked like it

-snip-
31 weeks * 14 points = 434 activity points.

From the first of march 2014  to 11 of may 2015 : 436 days  ... 434 days (his activity) / 14 activity points = 31 weeks   Maybe I can't explain my thought.

I might be wrong but it is actually 62 weeks as 14 days is 2 weeks not 1 week.

Yes , sorry I was wrong and I meant 31 activity 'times' ( each "activity time" is 14 days , so two weeks). Thanks for your correction.