hl5460 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1621
Merit: 1000
news.8btc.com
|
|
May 03, 2015, 08:51:01 AM |
|
A Chinese team just released a software, targeting to find the private key of addresses that are believed to be held by Satoshi himself. Source: http://8btc.com/thread-18085-1-1.htmlPrevious discussion hereMost ppl think it's a virus, or it's impossible, pure waste of energy.
|
|
|
|
tokeweed
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4130
Merit: 1461
Life, Love and Laughter...
|
|
May 03, 2015, 09:00:41 AM |
|
Interesting...
|
|
|
|
R |
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄ ████████████████ ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████ ████████▌███▐████ ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████ ████████████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀ | LLBIT | | | 4,000+ GAMES███████████████████ ██████████▀▄▀▀▀████ ████████▀▄▀██░░░███ ██████▀▄███▄▀█▄▄▄██ ███▀▀▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀███ ██░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░██ ██▄░░░░░░░█░░░░░▄██ ███▄░░░░▄█▄▄▄▄▄████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | █████████ ▀████████ ░░▀██████ ░░░░▀████ ░░░░░░███ ▄░░░░░███ ▀█▄▄▄████ ░░▀▀█████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | █████████ ░░░▀▀████ ██▄▄▀░███ █░░█▄░░██ ░████▀▀██ █░░█▀░░██ ██▀▀▄░███ ░░░▄▄████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ |
| | | | | | .
| | | ▄▄████▄▄ ▀█▀▄▀▀▄▀█▀ ▄▄░░▄█░██░█▄░░▄▄ ▄▄█░▄▀█░▀█▄▄█▀░█▀▄░█▄▄ ▀▄█░███▄█▄▄█▄███░█▄▀ ▀▀█░░░▄▄▄▄░░░█▀▀ █░░██████░░█ █░░░░▀▀░░░░█ █▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄█ ▄░█████▀▀█████░▄ ▄███████░██░███████▄ ▀▀██████▄▄██████▀▀ ▀▀████████▀▀ | . ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ░▀▄░▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄░▄▀ ███▀▄▀█████████████████▀▄▀ █████▀▄░▄▄▄▄▄███░▄▄▄▄▄▄▀ ███████▀▄▀██████░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ █████████▀▄▄░███▄▄▄▄▄▄░▄▀ ████████████░███████▀▄▀ ████████████░██▀▄▄▄▄▀ ████████████░▀▄▀ ████████████▄▀ ███████████▀ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄ ▄███▀▄▄███████▄▄▀███▄ ▄██▀▄█▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█▄▀██▄ ▄██▀▄███░░░▀████░███▄▀██▄ ███░████░░░░░▀██░████░███ ███░████░█▄░░░░▀░████░███ ███░████░███▄░░░░████░███ ▀██▄▀███░█████▄░░███▀▄██▀ ▀██▄▀█▄▄▄██████▄██▀▄██▀ ▀███▄▀▀███████▀▀▄███▀ ▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀ | | OFFICIAL PARTNERSHIP SOUTHAMPTON FC FAZE CLAN SSC NAPOLI |
|
|
|
fox19891989
|
|
May 03, 2015, 09:19:16 AM |
|
LMAO, interesting, I just wonder how many times they should run for satoshi's private key? SHA256 seems secure enough, I think they won't hack satoshi's keys in 1000 years. And it's immoral to hack others' btc addresses private keys, if they can hack those keys, no one's bitcoin address is secure, theoretically, they are just dreaming and doing evil things.
|
|
|
|
jacktheking
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1001
Personal Text Space Not For Sale
|
|
May 03, 2015, 09:29:28 AM |
|
If they lucky enough.. they might be able to find the private key. However.. even if they find it.. No one will be using Bitcoin since it is insecure.
So, what's the point of finding it if you can't sell it for a good price?
|
So sad! This profile does not appear as the #1 result (on anonymous) Google searches anymore.
Time to be active on the crypto forums again? Proud to be one of the few Legendary members of the Sparkie Red Dot!
Gonna put this on my resume if I ever join a cryptocurrency/blockchain industry!
|
|
|
vm_mpn
|
|
May 03, 2015, 09:31:06 AM |
|
Could you please explain in general terms the technical procedure of this effort? Are they going to reverse engineer his public key somehow? Or will they gather enough hashing power and speed to eventually generate the same key pair? Wish I could read Chinese
|
|
|
|
Miracal
|
|
May 03, 2015, 09:31:32 AM |
|
No body will take it serious! I think it is just some fun for the tech geeks.If the software author can can crack the private, he would be millionaire and wouldn't share with us.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
May 03, 2015, 09:39:29 AM |
|
Whoever believes this nonsense has very limited knowledge. I'm not even going to open the link as it is not necessary and it's loading very slowly for me. Why just Satoshi's coins? Why not hack every major exchange and take all Bitcoin? Even if someone had the software/power to do this, why would they do it? As soon as this happened the price would crash to zero. Besides claiming to beat SHA256 is big deal. The banks would probably come and assassinate you, among other things.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
Agestorzrxx
|
|
May 03, 2015, 09:39:52 AM |
|
This is a joke and stupid. If find a private key is that easy, there is no bitcoin any more.
|
|
|
|
|
SpanishSoldier
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:04:22 AM |
|
SHA256 seems secure enough, I think they won't hack satoshi's keys in 1000 years. Unless China is running some Quantam comuter secretly. And it's immoral to hack others' btc addresses private keys, if they can hack those keys, no one's bitcoin address is secure, theoretically, they are just dreaming and doing evil things. There is no point in considering evil things should not be done in financial world. If a system can not stand in front of an evil force, that system is fragile. I think the best way to secure coins is having them on a multisig generated offline. That way, even if someone stmble upon any of the private key of an address (I know the possibility calculation... but getting a real random source is the problem), the coins will stay secure.
|
|
|
|
louise123
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:10:07 AM |
|
Is there an English version of this. I can't read (nor speak) Chinese so an English version would be great. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Kaneki
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:10:59 AM |
|
if this is true and he is successful,it would supposed destruction for price and bitcoin itself.
|
|
|
|
S4VV4S
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:13:31 AM |
|
SHA256 seems secure enough, I think they won't hack satoshi's keys in 1000 years. Unless China is running some Quantam comuter secretly. And it's immoral to hack others' btc addresses private keys, if they can hack those keys, no one's bitcoin address is secure, theoretically, they are just dreaming and doing evil things. There is no point in considering evil things should not be done in financial world. If a system can not stand in front of an evil force, that system is fragile. I think the best way to secure coins is having them on a multisig generated offline. That way, even if someone stmble upon any of the private key of an address (I know the possibility calculation... but getting a real random source is the problem), the coins will stay secure. I think they are trying to brute force the addresses with something similar (if not the same) to Vanity. It's the only thing that makes sense to me.
|
|
|
|
SpanishSoldier
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:22:11 AM |
|
if this is true and he is successful,it would supposed destruction for price and bitcoin itself.
As if they'll tell u that they are successfull. The world will think that Satoshi is moving his coins.
|
|
|
|
Q7
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:30:57 AM |
|
Why bother? just let them try and see how it turns out. I wouldn't be surprise if the software is actually a hidden mining software that mines in the background instead of claiming to find private key to the address. And if there is tons of people using the software, imagine how many coins can be mined and sent to the person.
|
|
|
|
hua_hui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1016
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:31:30 AM |
|
if this is true and he is successful,it would supposed destruction for price and bitcoin itself.
As if they'll tell u that they are successfull. The world will think that Satoshi is moving his coins. Before Quantam comuter come out, some coins probably take the place of bitcoin with more complicated algo.or Bitcoin can evolve to new algo otherwise it will die!
|
|
|
|
SpanishSoldier
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:43:03 AM |
|
if this is true and he is successful,it would supposed destruction for price and bitcoin itself.
As if they'll tell u that they are successfull. The world will think that Satoshi is moving his coins. Before Quantam comuter come out, some coins probably take the place of bitcoin with more complicated algo.or Bitcoin can evolve to new algo otherwise it will die! Moving from SHA-256 to SHA-512 may thoratically solve the problem. But, that would require a hard fork, which is not easy at the scale Bitcoin is spread right now.
|
|
|
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:45:57 AM |
|
They will need some million years to crack one address with 50 BTC in it. Hooray! Most of Satoshis wallets contain 50BTC or less as far as I know, so cracking it in more than a few years, would be -EV.
|
|
|
|
NeuroticFish
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 6583
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
|
|
May 03, 2015, 11:00:55 AM |
|
Could you please explain in general terms the technical procedure of this effort? Are they going to reverse engineer his public key somehow? Or will they gather enough hashing power and speed to eventually generate the same key pair? Wish I could read Chinese I think that they try to create a 'vanity address' that is actually Satoshi's address. (The public vanity generator may need some adjustment for that.)
|
|
|
|
numanoid
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1148
|
|
May 03, 2015, 11:01:59 AM |
|
Hmmmm... that is interesting/funny and crazy at the same time . Even if they bring a SuperComputer, they can't possibly crack it in several 100 years. And even if they do it let's say in 50 years , they will get 50 btc , 1 btc a year ? . They can mine better with that suer computer of there's
|
|
|
|
|