Sitarow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
May 08, 2015, 06:47:22 PM |
|
Time and Sales for Bitcoin Investment Trust May 08, 2015 Symbol: (GBTC) Time Price Volume Market 14:19:58 54.50 275 OTO 14:14:03 55.00 200 OTO 14:14:00 52.00 400 OTO 14:13:48 50.00 498 OTO 14:08:36 52.00 2 OTO 14:03:01 53.00 50 OTO 13:57:13 53.00 25 OTO 13:29:09 50.00 1000 OTO 13:25:17 50.00 1000 OTO 13:18:15 53.00 10 OTO 13:08:09 50.00 1000 OTO 12:55:05 53.00 300 OTO 12:48:00 52.95 29 OTO 12:47:54 52.95 64 OTO 12:47:52 52.95 5 OTO 12:40:38 52.95 7 OTO 12:24:59 52.95 18 OTO 12:24:42 52.90 75 OTO 12:15:29 52.95 1 OTO 12:14:56 52.95 30 OTO 12:04:00 52.95 1 OTO 11:52:19 52.00 10 OTO 11:47:56 53.00 59 OTO 11:45:12 53.00 172 OTO 11:34:56 50.00 1000 OTO 11:25:02 50.00 500 OTO 11:24:00 50.00 500 OTO 11:23:10 50.00 500 OTO 11:22:38 50.00 500 OTO 11:19:47 50.00 24 OTO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Chainsaw (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2015, 07:25:23 PM |
|
A posted Bid of $50 and a posted Ask of $51.
I'll be watching how the market reacts to Maxim's presumable 'ever-renewing' Buy at 50.00. The first few hours it led, then frontrunners got some fills, and now they sit at the top. Bidders outbidding the leading bid shows demand outpacing supply. Maxim holding the lead indicates a possible false floor, if sufficient new liquidity does not replace theirs.
|
|
|
|
Chainsaw (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2015, 07:26:12 PM Last edit: May 09, 2015, 10:07:21 PM by Chainsaw |
|
This is another one of those pure speculation, here's what's going on in my head posts. Wanted to share my recent theorization. This is an interesting market dynamic.
There is no guarantee that any actor is correct. But I do feel understanding motives gives insight into how the market may behave down the road.
The million dollar question right now seems to be
"WHY are people paying these 100+% premiums? Who does that?"
I couldn't quite put my finger on it either. There are lots of pieces, and I'm unfamiliar with most. OTC. BIT holders converting shares after 12 month holding period. Tax deferred benefits. Value-add for convenience, safety, etc.
Put a black box around all that, and call it valuation. WHY are people willing to pay 100% premium?
I nearly liquidated my small existing position when I had the next thought:
As soon as COIN hits the market, GBTC will have a far more liquid, high volume competitor. The only possible way the premium could remain is if (close to) the same premium exists for COIN. I thought, surely this means we will rocket down to current-BTC prices. But we haven't. Sure I just realized these things, but they have been true of the market all along.
A reasonable explanation was still missing. IPO enthusiasm was the only possible candidate.
Then it clicked.
Simplifying the sale mechanism - the only way new shares are introduced is when a 12+ month holder sells their coins.
If 100% of the BIT holders sold their shares, no new ones would be available for purchase for 12 months. Except on the "aftermarket", from GBTC sellers that had originally purchased from these first-sellers.
So this initial supply is limited. It is large, but it is limited.
If we assume the following: a) COIN will eventually launch. b) Market prices will eventually drive both COIN and $GBTC to close-to-parity with BTC market prices, with a small, constant premium.
There is one explanation for why people are willing to pay $50/share for GBTC.
The market has indicated its belief that the exhaustion of the first wave of shares, reconciled against the aftermarket seller price, will result in an equilibrium on par with market prices when BTC prices are worth no less than $500.
Said more simply, buyers believe we'll run out of shares for sale before Bitcoin valuates to $500.
I think of it like a metric from a prediction market.
|
|
|
|
Chainsaw (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2015, 07:30:23 PM |
|
Maxim is testing the market. They put their Bid at $49 to see if the market will follow them down. If they are rewarded for their efforts, I would expect them to rinse and repeat the experiment. I think they're trying to accelerate the price discovery, let someone else soak up some shares, in case the final settled price is lower.
30 minutes left for the day's trading, very interested to see relative volume and price moves. 13,569 shares as of now.
|
|
|
|
Keyser Soze
|
|
May 08, 2015, 07:36:43 PM |
|
Interesting analysis... I've been watching these first days very closely and your explanation of the premium sounds reasonable, hadn't thought of that.
|
|
|
|
chriswen
|
|
May 08, 2015, 07:41:29 PM |
|
Yup GBTC is like a black box. There is totally limited supply right now. And the demand for that limited supply could be huge.
Also no $49 bids got filled.
|
|
|
|
Chef Ramsay
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 08, 2015, 07:55:30 PM |
|
Yep, good thread Chainsaw. It's fun to observe and speculate in a comprehensive fashion when the environment isn't overflowing w/ troll nonsense.
|
|
|
|
uvwvj
|
|
May 08, 2015, 07:57:18 PM |
|
New ask
CSTI 50.00 2000 15:45
* Correction make that 4000
|
|
|
|
bitbouillion
|
|
May 08, 2015, 08:35:45 PM |
|
BITCOIN INVT TR (GBTC) -Other OTC 49.00 Up 9.00(22.50%) 3:57PM EDT Prev Close: 40.00 Open: 50.00 Volume: 14,807 Why would one buy a BTC for $490, when the price on US-regulated exchanges is $244?
|
|
|
|
Alley
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 08, 2015, 08:44:41 PM |
|
BITCOIN INVT TR (GBTC) -Other OTC 49.00 Up 9.00(22.50%) 3:57PM EDT Prev Close: 40.00 Open: 50.00 Volume: 14,807 Why would one buy a BTC for $490, when the price on US-regulated exchanges is $244? Why is this same question asked every day?
|
|
|
|
hector3115
|
|
May 08, 2015, 08:45:31 PM |
|
I know one thing, if I was a year long holder of GBTC and underwater, I would happily dump my GBTC at a value of $500.00 and then take that profit to the exchange and double you bitcoin exposure. This is possibly the reason for the spot price rally today.
Could be the reason for future rallies too.
Bottom line, ETF's are going to be great for bitcoin.
|
| | | | │ | | │ | BUY CRYPTO AT REASONABLE RATES▄▄███████▄▄ ▄█████▀ ▀█████▄ ██████ ▄█▄ ██████ ██████ █████ ██████ █████ ▄ ███ ▄ █████ ████▌▐██ █ ██▌▐████ ███▄ ▀▀▌ ▐▀▀ ▄███ ▀████▄▄ ▄▄████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄█████▀█▀█████▄ ████ ▀████ ███████ ███ █████ ███████ ▀█████ ███████ ███ █████ ████ ▄████ ▀█████▄█▄█████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄█████▀▀▀█████▄ ██████ ▐███████ ██████▌ ▀▀███████ █████▀ ▄████████ ████▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀████ ███▌ ▄███ ▀█████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀ | & | OTHER COINS |
| │ | |
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 08, 2015, 08:53:06 PM |
|
4k ASK at 50
|
|
|
|
Chainsaw (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2015, 09:11:54 PM |
|
New ask
CSTI 50.00 4000 15:45 make that 4000
I first worried about this as a looming negative over the weekend. I think that was a nervous over-reaction. CSTI's bid shows an intent to buy at least 4k more at the same 50.00 rate that 4,000 new shares entered the market at today. My read - "Don't worry Maxim - we'll be here buying again at Monday. At $50. Not $49." Why would one buy a BTC for $490, when the price on US-regulated exchanges is $244?
I posted the only logical theories I can think above a few posts above. Simplified, I postulate we will find GBTC equilibrium at the same price that COIN becomes available. I think this will be general market sentiment. Once COIN is available, it will be more desirable. At that point, GBTC purchases will track with it, for when it falls below, it will be an arbitrage opportunity. A nice day of trading. Nice to see real volume, a true middlepoint hit, and a first fight for which side will pull the other. Remember there are two camps of shares. Once sold, they become more liquid. I expect volume to ramp week to week as this liquid portion increases.
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 08, 2015, 09:15:23 PM |
|
don't you need a wall observer to have a wall observer thread?
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4239
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
May 08, 2015, 09:20:10 PM |
|
Why would one buy a BTC for $490, when the price on US-regulated exchanges is $244?
The answer to this question is simple. The only advantage in buying this fund over buying BTC straight is the ability to purchase in your tax shielded accounts. Therefore, the logical explanation is that people are paying a premium to get exposure to tax free BTC gains. If you believe the price is headed to $10,000, you would much rather purchase at $500 without tax liabilities than to purchase at $250 with tax liabilities. That is the only logical explanation for the premium we are seeing.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Chainsaw (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2015, 09:20:42 PM |
|
2nd rename suggestion. The intent was a parallel but specialized speculation/analysis/theorizing/watching thread specific to GBTC, and speculated interactions with the BTC market.
Throw out some suggestions (all). I'd say I'm all ears but there was a most excellent burn in masterluc's thread the other day that I don't want repeated in my direction :-)
|
|
|
|
bitasset
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
May 08, 2015, 09:27:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 08, 2015, 09:38:27 PM |
|
2nd rename suggestion. The intent was a parallel but specialized speculation/analysis/theorizing/watching thread specific to GBTC, and speculated interactions with the BTC market.
Throw out some suggestions (all). I'd say I'm all ears but there was a most excellent burn in masterluc's thread the other day that I don't want repeated in my direction :-)
Instead of renaming the thread just construct a wall observer. That would be useful.
|
|
|
|
Chainsaw (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2015, 10:10:47 PM |
|
Maybe Richy_T would be willing to post a GBTC version of his output to this thread. I don't know if an available data stream for $GBTC is in the same format as what he's currently parsing or receiving from. Might be worth pursuing.
I appreciate Sitarow posting the book from time to time.
|
|
|
|
|