[ANN] ARBIT COIN|SHA256| POD VERIFIED |AR/VR WALLET|POS|VOICE 2FA|EXCHANGES

[kevin1234a]

If you dont have the pools in at launch it is not a fair launch as not everyone can solo mine. Some people have to remote to their miners or have rented miners. The honourable and correct thing to do is to do go test your code and do a re-launch at a later date. If you continue you will lose support of the pools and the coin will be tainted with fud from day one.

+10

+100

im jelous mate we have to wait for pools DARKCRAVE was much better ninja launch last night

[1714843364]

1714843364

[1714843364]

1714843364

[1714843364]

1714843364

[1714843364]

1714843364

[polesdav]

Probably intentional instamine without pools.. as the win wallet has to be compiled from a working source..

that's the truth!


why are you all still mining this shit!?!?

[CryptoSiD]

SuchPool is up.

[ARbit]

Probably intentional instamine without pools.. as the win wallet has to be compiled from a working source..

The Windows wallet was working for solo-miners and we fixed the source, not intentional. That is why we made the block reward 2-100 with 0 rewards (fair launch blocks).

[TimC]

If you dont have the pools in at launch it is not a fair launch as not everyone can solo mine. Some people have to remote to their miners or have rented miners. The honourable and correct thing to do is to do go test your code and do a re-launch at a later date. If you continue you will lose support of the pools and the coin will be tainted with fud from day one.

+10

+100

im jelous mate we have to wait for pools DARKCRAVE was much better ninja launch last night

I was sleeping during the DarkCrave launch otherwise I might have gotten some block solo mining.

[cakir]

We need relaunch in an hour
or refund of ico funds. That's why there's escrow

[jambo110]

Probably intentional instamine without pools.. as the win wallet has to be compiled from a working source..

The Windows wallet was working for solo-miners and we fixed the source, not intentional. That is why we made the block reward 2-100 with 0 rewards (fair launch blocks).

someone was already 200th hash running before pools joined

[seedooroff]

If you dont have the pools in at launch it is not a fair launch as not everyone can solo mine. Some people have to remote to their miners or have rented miners. The honourable and correct thing to do is to do go test your code and do a re-launch at a later date. If you continue you will lose support of the pools and the coin will be tainted with fud from day one.

Even if the code works now it is 10min down the line and blocks have been solo mined.

I agree with this opinion.

Following the situation.

Another deception at the start! As a guarantor, you have to do something.

[klopper]

Yeah... this was a bad launch

Imo you should relaunch with working source from start...

[arloseb]

LAUNCH FAILED

Refund

[jc12345]

Probably intentional instamine without pools.. as the win wallet has to be compiled from a working source..

The Windows wallet was working for solo-miners and we fixed the source, not intentional. That is why we made the block reward 2-100 with 0 rewards (fair launch blocks).

Have you seen TimC's pic above of his wallet? (lucky bastid) This is ACISCs we are talking about at <10 difficulty and not CPU miners. ASICS let 100 blocks fly by in 10 seconds.

[alexrossi]

09:10:35

{
"Blocks" : 241,
"Current Block Size" : 1000,
"Current Block Tx" : 0,
"Difficulty" : {
"Proof of Work" : 701.20856510,
"Proof of Stake" : 0.00024414,
"Search Interval" : 1
},
"Block Value" : 10000000000,
"Net MH/s" : 83657.44040998,
"Net Stake Weight" : 0.00000000,
"Errors" : "",
"Pooled Tx" : 0,
"Stake Weight" : {
"Minimum" : 0,
"Maximum" : 0,
"Combined" : 0
},
"Stake Interest" : 0,
"Testnet" : false
}

Quoted for reference

>100 blocks (excluding the zero reward blocks) minted when github source was broken

In my opinion this was not a fair launch

[TimC]

Probably intentional instamine without pools.. as the win wallet has to be compiled from a working source..

The Windows wallet was working for solo-miners and we fixed the source, not intentional. That is why we made the block reward 2-100 with 0 rewards (fair launch blocks).

someone was already 200th hash running before pools joined

I hammered down almost all of the 0 reward blocks and hit quite a few 100 reward blocks but I don't have near close to 200th more like 200GH.

[CryptoSiD]

Probably intentional instamine without pools.. as the win wallet has to be compiled from a working source..

Remember this guys.

[kevin1234a]

and the nichhash is down now WTF ,,,,,,, cursed launch maybe

[chey]

Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like we only missed the "fair mining" blocks according to the info graphic. Nothing gained there anyway.

[arloseb]

09:10:35

{
"Blocks" : 241,
"Current Block Size" : 1000,
"Current Block Tx" : 0,
"Difficulty" : {
"Proof of Work" : 701.20856510,
"Proof of Stake" : 0.00024414,
"Search Interval" : 1
},
"Block Value" : 10000000000,
"Net MH/s" : 83657.44040998,
"Net Stake Weight" : 0.00000000,
"Errors" : "",
"Pooled Tx" : 0,
"Stake Weight" : {
"Minimum" : 0,
"Maximum" : 0,
"Combined" : 0
},
"Stake Interest" : 0,
"Testnet" : false
}

Quoted for reference

>100 blocks (excluding the zero reward blocks) minted when github source was broken

In my opinion this was not a fair launch

right alex
Launch failled and invetor need to be fefunded.

you're the best escrow outthere.

[kevin1234a]

appreciate OC u alert lot of miners out there

http://prntscr.com/75howx

all pools should do such alert unless they are behind this coin

[klopper]

Good call Alexrossi!

Relaunch or refund imo.

[ntfl]

Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like we only missed the "fair mining" blocks according to the info graphic. Nothing gained there anyway.

http://i1061.photobucket.com/albums/t472/TimFChavez/arbit_zpsbqamgjgp.jpg