Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 11:15:49 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: More huge news  (Read 3347 times)
hector3115 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 481
Merit: 251



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 12:57:17 AM
 #1

http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-bitcoin-technology-gets-nasdaq-test-1431296886

Bitcoins potential being realized

BUY CRYPTO AT REASONABLE RATES
▄▄███████▄▄
▄█████▀ ▀█████▄
██████ ▄█▄ ██████
██████ █████ ██████
█████ ▄ ███ ▄ █████
████▌▐██ █ ██▌▐████
███▄ ▀▀▌ ▐▀▀ ▄███
▀████▄▄ ▄▄████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
▄▄███████▄▄
▄█████▀█▀█████▄
████        ▀████
███████  ███  █████
███████      ▀█████
███████  ███  █████
████        ▄████
▀█████▄█▄█████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
▄▄███████▄▄
▄█████▀▀▀█████▄
██████   ▐███████
██████▌   ▀▀███████
█████▀    ▄████████
████▄    ▀▀▀▀▀▀████
███▌         ▄███
▀█████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
&OTHER
COINS
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 01:02:11 AM
 #2

Extra hugeness that wasn't in the article

https://twitter.com/mikejcasey/status/597545262345682945

NASDAQ realises there's no point in using 'blockchain technology'. The real deal makes most sense.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 3995



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 01:21:27 AM
 #3

Interesting. However, I don't see how one satoshi can be a transaction with dust limit of 546 satoshis.
If each share will be represented by 546 satoshis, nasdaq will need 546x[2.1bil shares]=~1.1trillion satoshis daily=11 thou bitcoins daily (three times more than daily production).
If each transaction is represented by 546 satoshis, then 546X2.5 mil daily=~1.1 bil satoshis=100 bitcoins daily-more doable.
However, once these satoshis are associated with shares, they will not be able to be associated with newly traded shares, so a constant flow of satoshis will be directed toward shares and these will be removed from daily circulation (until those shares are traded), hence a pool of available satoshis will be constantly depleting.
Alley
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 02:38:25 AM
 #4

Can you post the article?  I don't have a WSJ account.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 02:46:19 AM
 #5

Can you post the article?  I don't have a WSJ account.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/35jawi/a_bitcoin_technology_gets_nasdaq_test/cr4xel8
Alley
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 02:52:50 AM
 #6

Amazing stuff.  Wall street would save tons of money in lawyer in bank fees.  And I didn't realize it took 3 days to finalize trades. 
stonerider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 03:42:08 AM
 #7

To Da Moon!!!

Not.
Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 03:52:59 AM
 #8

Amazing stuff.  Wall street would save tons of money in lawyer in bank fees.  And I didn't realize it took 3 days to finalize trades. 
Well, you fooled yourself in such an epic way that I'd say that "naked and afraid" is too much for ya.
lay785
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 05:13:41 AM
 #9

Very good news.

After the Goldman Sachs' investment into "Circle", wall street is starting to wake up and realise that bitcoin/blockchain-decentralised-technology-ledgar is the future.
Harnessing this technology for the commercial sector will help their industry as well as increase the utility of the bockchain.

Obviously many of us want bitcoin as a currency to succeed and this kind of positive news strengthens our vision.
Hunyadi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000


☑ ♟ ☐ ♚


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 08:40:02 AM
 #10


I'm glad it is THE blockchain Cheesy

▂▃▅▇█▓▒░B**-Cultist░▒▓█▇▅▃▂
podyx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 11:15:11 AM
 #11

Extra hugeness that wasn't in the article

https://twitter.com/mikejcasey/status/597545262345682945

NASDAQ realises there's no point in using 'blockchain technology'. The real deal makes most sense.

ThatDGuy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 01:30:03 PM
 #12

Extra hugeness that wasn't in the article

https://twitter.com/mikejcasey/status/597545262345682945

NASDAQ realises there's no point in using 'blockchain technology'. The real deal makes most sense.



NeuroticFish
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 6428


Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 01:36:25 PM
 #13

If they'll do it, this will mean a ton of tiny transactions, but which will increase the blockchain a lot.
I am not sure if it's a good news. In a year after that's gone live, the common user will not have space to hold the blockchain => no more true decentralization.

█████████████████████████
████▐██▄█████████████████
████▐██████▄▄▄███████████
████▐████▄█████▄▄████████
████▐█████▀▀▀▀▀███▄██████
████▐███▀████████████████
████▐█████████▄█████▌████
████▐██▌█████▀██████▌████
████▐██████████▀████▌████
█████▀███▄█████▄███▀█████
███████▀█████████▀███████
██████████▀███▀██████████
█████████████████████████
.
BC.GAME
▄▄░░░▄▀▀▄████████
▄▄▄
██████████████
█████░░▄▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄██████▄▄▄▄████
▄███▄█▄▄██████████▄████▄████
███████████████████████████▀███
▀████▄██▄██▄░░░░▄████████████
▀▀▀█████▄▄▄███████████▀██
███████████████████▀██
███████████████████▄██
▄███████████████████▄██
█████████████████████▀██
██████████████████████▄
.
..CASINO....SPORTS....RACING..
Valle
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 177
Merit: 101


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 06:18:43 PM
 #14

Banks exchanges by a relatively huge transactions about once a day, so it is not a problem.
manselr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 06:24:44 PM
 #15

If they'll do it, this will mean a ton of tiny transactions, but which will increase the blockchain a lot.
I am not sure if it's a good news. In a year after that's gone live, the common user will not have space to hold the blockchain => no more true decentralization.
But you are not taking into account the fact that free space gets improving yearly and we'll get to a point were this is not an issue anymore.
HeliKopterBen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 11, 2015, 06:37:36 PM
 #16

If they'll do it, this will mean a ton of tiny transactions, but which will increase the blockchain a lot.
I am not sure if it's a good news. In a year after that's gone live, the common user will not have space to hold the blockchain => no more true decentralization.

Lol c'mon man.  I remember back in 2012 - if Tom's mini mart began accepting bitcoin, it meant moon.  Now the nasdaq is experimenting with bitcoin as the backend for the stock market... and that is bad news? 

Scaling solutions are on the table now.  It may take a few years, but bitcoin will be able to scale to handle this. 

Counterfeit:  made in imitation of something else with intent to deceive:  merriam-webster
PerfectCoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 06:40:19 PM
 #17

don't know about future impact but right now it turned the market green,
bitcoin will hit 300 this month
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 06:41:03 PM
 #18

Extra hugeness that wasn't in the article

https://twitter.com/mikejcasey/status/597545262345682945

NASDAQ realises there's no point in using 'blockchain technology'. The real deal makes most sense.





ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2015, 07:15:28 PM
 #19

'Blockchain' now hoas officially gone full tech bubble buzzword. Doing any sort of record keeping inside the Bitcoin Blockchain in anything besides the personal scale is comical because it would increase the data storage requirements beyond what's being sustainable.
Heresy2122
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2015, 07:35:36 PM
 #20

'Blockchain' now hoas officially gone full tech bubble buzzword. Doing any sort of record keeping inside the Bitcoin Blockchain in anything besides the personal scale is comical because it would increase the data storage requirements beyond what's being sustainable.
Shut up you filthy heretic.


We don't read the actual articles and think critically about them, only the headlines.
If it contains "blockchain" and "NASDAQ" in the same sentence, it's moon guaranteed.

"Still, bitcoin-based settlement remains untested in the real world. Regulators worry about the anonymous status of the bitcoin miners that collectively manage the system. It is conceivable that bad actors might one day take over the mining network and destroy the integrity of its verification system, some say.

Also, bitcoin’s underlying software is unable to handle the massive increase in data storage that a Wall Street settlement system would require."



Everybody knows that when venture capital money is involved, nothing can go wrong.
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!