is that information true? where did you get that?
it would be amazing if everyone could live longer
Step back. Remember were you are: Bitcoin Forum > Other > Politics & Society > "Most people could live past 130 if they choose to, while aging very little _ No I won't tell you how..."
Let's cut to the chase. Where can I send my bitcoins to know the answer?
Not so fast. I would love to oblige you, but I rather you learn of my honesty and insight first.
I am the real deal, but I can be anyone and full of crap so stay tuned. There are just too many
human expressions that have been belittled through fraudulent top-down approved cultural manipulations.
This is too good of a topic for me to lie or troll.
I'm supposing it's relating to this guy:
Aubrey de Grey (
wikipedia). He's a professor at Oxford I think who has been researching regenerative medicine: cleansing cells + healthy living, so as to extend life. Is this it OP?
Healthy living only does so much to extend your life, nowhere near the "past 130 if they choose to", and you will age accordingly(So you will be "old and wrinkly" at age 90 for example no matter how healthy you are).
The only things I know of that can actually potentially reverse or temporary stop aging is Stem cells, nanomedicine(Such as enzymes that somehow "replenish" cells, or discovering how to apply Henrietta Lack's "immortal cells" to stop aging in everyone else(As telomores are thought to be the thing that as they shrink do to every cell splitting, cause aging of the cell and eventual death of said cell, that's ceased however in the case of "immortal cells").
Then there's robotics and the prospect of "transforming" the human body with robotic machinery.
Your opinion is based on mainstream science and culture. Mostly for money grabbing and TV fluff leading people with
false hope and steering them into the hands of the Administrative State ultimately. I am well aware of the
concepts you have mentioned, but this is only part of the awareness required for what I will elaborate on in
this thread.
By the way, how many times have you been in resthomes to study the elderly? I have seen many resthome
patients who are 80 - 90 with baby smooth skin and less wrinkles than a 50 year old. These people unfortunately
have been captured by the state and have little opportunity to be aware of their own biology. Now imagine the worst
case scenario of my interest, where if these same people were well nourished via modern nutritional understandings
for most of their life on top of their genetic predisposition to look fairly healthy at such ages. There are great changes
available for people now! But you must be willing to deprogram yourself and expand your conscious awareness. Its
a growing and learning experience.
Living is all about quality of life if the quality isn't good then why bother living?
That's exactly the point. A few years ago, I happened to listen to someone who advocated healthy living. He argued that if we want longevity, then we should avoid tobacco, alcohol, fast food, salt, sugar, cheese, french fries, all types of meat, fish, butter, coca cola... and some 8,745 other food items. I said "No, thanks. I prefer to live up to 80 years of age, eating and drinking whatever I want rather than living up to 100 years and obeying your orders."
So you take the views of one individual and settle your mind? How far is this thought process from racism? Normalcy
bias much? But fear not good sir. You see, I don't need to talk like the fellow you mentioned. Indeed you can still
enjoy all kinds of unhealthy things and still outlive others in better health very much. The issue is balance. So for example,
if you enjoy highly acidic foods which are lethal for the body over time, you could easily mitigate this issue via proper
alkalization techniques. Alkalization is another topic that has much misinterpretations surrounding it. You can't just
brute-force your body into an alkaline state and expect to be safe for long. This can be dangerous. You have to instead provide the ingredients that body is programmed to use so that it can produce the proper cellular environment on it's own.
There is no need for you to approach this concept with the spirit of rebellion, as implied by you "obeying your orders". I think along higher thought processes than this regarding this topic and you have nothing to loose by
keeping your eyes open a little longer on some people and concepts so that you can notice more things.
I can make an opinion about you that you have allot of positive energy pent up, but would like more ways
to use it. Well here you go. I will do my best to encourage you.
Most people can't afford a healthy life. You have to go to work every day into a stressful environment that can get more stressful when your car doesn't start or someone cuts you off, boss is in a bad mood, weather is bad and so on. You have no time to go for a walk because you have to get kids from school, go to the store to buy food and do 100 other things.
I'm sure we'd live much longer if we had robots to do all the work and could just go to the gym every day and then lie down in the garden drinking milkshakes and watching birds.
This is not entirely true. There are many poor people who outlive the ultra rich and in great health.
For example, by hydrating properly and avoiding food damaging techniques such as high heat and
microwave ovens, you would end up saving money by actually absorbing more nutrient content and alleviating
the body of the toxic conditions produced by bad cooking practices. This choice does not necessarily require
an unrealistic amount of money. Proper nutrition results in less stress being experienced. The brain is a very
sensitive organ and uses the most amount of energy in the body. It only makes sense but to focus on keeping
it nourished, as it controls all major organs in the body via bidirectional nerve communication and chemical
processes.
The brain needs lots of healthy fats in order to properly expend and replenish it's energy. This has allot to
do with the perception of stress. There is much more I could say on this but for now, try working on expanding
the ways in which you perceive information. There is no need to think with a limited thought process just because
you feel settled and confident at yourself. New studies come out daily in the world of biology, so really even what
I say has the potential to be very relative. As more data comes out, I assimilate it into my thoughts. If there wasn't
relevant data available, or the ability of myself to perceive data as relevant, then this thread wouldn't even exist.
Your greatest excitements are always yet to be realized. So don't miss out on potential new ones as they become
available to your faculties and soon to be faculties. Take your time to deeply study nutrition for years. If you have
kids for example, take a guess at what has a higher potential to exist for them and you when their organs are developed
in the most pristine conditions. This is another subject I could go into. Raising super geniuses with consistency.
I'm supposing it's relating to this guy:
Aubrey de Grey (
wikipedia). He's a professor at Oxford I think who has been researching regenerative medicine: cleansing cells + healthy living, so as to extend life. Is this it OP?
He is a great researcher to learn from. However, don't settle your views on just one person. I know very much
about the type of research he is involved in, but I know other areas of research that can be compounded for
even greater realizations of just how long we can live and age less.
