Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 12:54:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: The Next Step for Digital Currencies  (Read 1520 times)
Erdogan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 31, 2015, 12:33:44 AM
 #21

Fiat is better if it is printed by the equation  M = (1/V)*P*Y

Unfortunately, V, P, and Y are difficult to determine.

Those get determined by Ben Bernanke and friends, thats exactly why Bitcoin is better.

Appearantly, it is also difficult to determine M. We have a single equation with four unknowns. Not solvable.
1714611262
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714611262

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714611262
Reply with quote  #2

1714611262
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
username18333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Knowledge could but approximate existence.


View Profile WWW
May 31, 2015, 03:34:06 AM
 #22

This [h]as always been contemplated as a possibility by a lot of people over time, yet nobody has found a way to have a decentralized, egalitarian model for issuing and distributing cryptocoins.

Code:
sendfreetransactions=1
Code:
sendtoaddress [address] [balance + amount]

Your “poor” could appropriate a greater portion of the (monetary) value of the GEC economy to themselves.

Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
username18333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Knowledge could but approximate existence.


View Profile WWW
May 31, 2015, 03:36:21 AM
 #23


“The question is how make the issuance of and access to money egalitarian on the one hand.”


What about work? What about merit? What about talent? Sorry, but issuance and access to money shall never be egalitarian. No way!
Especially as some people will lose, spend or give away their fair share and end up with nothing.
They will then complain that the system isn't fair as some who saved, stole or somehow acquired coins would be rich in the new world, just as they are under the current system.

Not sure how G.E. works, but I would love to have a system where anyone can issue money and the markets decide which monies survive.

The G.E. government certifies coins as "Great Empire Coin (GEC)" through a network that allows one to spend more coins than they hold. This is the G.E. government's equivalent of empowering a central bank to purchase more bonds than the bank's preexisting cash holdings would permit.

What system is in place to prevent individuals from issuing/spending more money than they earn (in the past or future?)
What system is in place to prevent individuals from issuing/spending more money than they earn (in the past or future?)

Quote from: Judges 17:6, 21:25 (Darby)
In those days there was no king in Israel; every man did what was right in his own eyes.

Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!