Bitcoin Forum
June 08, 2024, 05:06:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: King Of Bahrain Snubs US President, Meets Horse Instead  (Read 525 times)
galdur (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 14, 2015, 08:43:16 PM
 #1

Obama Becoming Global Joke? King Of Bahrain Snubs US President, Meets Horse Instead

Having been 'snubbed' by the new Saudi King Salman, it appears the uneasy relationshipo with our 'allies' in The Gulf is ebbing. In what the State Department will, we are sure, just brush off, Politico reports that the king of Bahrain has apparently also snubbed President Barack Obama, preferring instead to attend a horse show with Queen Elizabeth.

Obama had invited the leaders of the six Gulf Cooperation Council nations - Bahrain, Oman, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia - to discuss regional security and other issues at a Camp David summit this week; but with Bahrain and Saudi Arabia missing, it appears the discussion will be short.

According to Reuters, King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa has elected to attend the Royal Windsor Horse Show, which begins Wednesday, at Windsor Castle outside London.
 
Obama had invited the leaders of the six Gulf Cooperation Council nations — Bahrain, Oman, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia — to discuss regional security and other issues at a Camp David summit this week.
 
But Saudi King Salman announced Sunday that he would send a surrogate instead of attending himself, joining the leaders of the UAE and Oman, who have cited health concerns in their decisions not to attend. The Bahraini king’s decision not to attend was reported earlier this week, though his trip to the United Kingdom was first announced Wednesday.
 
Analysts have pointed to a growing rift between the Obama administration and the Gulf’s Sunni states over the emerging nuclear deal with Iran as a chief reason for the snub, though the Saudi king, as well as his Bahraini counterpart, have denied such assertions.
 
Bahrain’s official news agency reported that the country’s foreign minister identified the horse show and subsequent meeting with the queen as “a longstanding prior engagement” that necessitated the king’s absence from the Camp David summit.
 
The leader of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, met with the English royal at the Royal Ascot horse race but elected to fly to Washington to attend the meeting with Obama afterward.
The U.S. may be seeking a rapprochement with Iran over its nuclear program, potentially ending several decades of hostility, but as OilPrice noted yesterday, while the U.S. is extending an open hand to Iran, other countries in the Middle East are casting a wary eye towards the negotiations...

In fact, it is starting to appear that Gulf Arab states could be a major impediment to a final agreement over Iran’s nuclear program. Led by Saudi Arabia, many of the oil-producing members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) are skeptical of, if not downright hostile towards Iran. With little trust between Iran and its Arab neighbors, it will be hard to get all of the Middle East on board for an agreement. On this, GCC states find themselves in the same camp as Israel.
 
The Obama administration surely thought it could get countries like Saudi Arabia and Bahrain to get behind a nuclear deal, owing to the fact that they are close allies of the United States.
 
But in a surprise move, Saudi Arabia’s King Salman decided not to attend a summit hosted by U.S. President Barack Obama in Camp David this week. As recently as May 8, Saudi Arabia confirmed that the King would attend the meeting, intended to assuage the security concerns of Gulf countries over the pending nuclear negotiations.
 
Ostensibly, the Saudi King is staying behind to monitor the security situation in Yemen, as the conflict enters a temporary cease-fire beginning on May 13. “There is zero tension,” a Saudi official reportedly said in an effort to downplay the significance of Saudi Arabia’s decision to blow off the Camp David event, according to the Washington Post. “In fact, the relationship is as strong as it has been in quite some time. Our understanding is that the Saudis and other GCC leaders are quite pleased with U.S. positions and the substance of Camp David, including any assistance we are going to provide.”
 
However, the New York Times reported that Saudi Arabia was disappointed with what the U.S. offered through Secretary of State John Kerry, when he met with the King in Riyadh last week. Saudi Arabia was apparently looking for a much stronger assurance of U.S. support, such as a defense treaty. The U.S., however, is not willing to go that far, which likely led to the Saudi King’s decision to cancel his trip to Camp David.
 
Bahrain, Oman, and the UAE will also not be sending their heads of state. Instead, the four Gulf nations will send deputies. Only the leaders of Kuwait and Qatar will attend.
 
Even worse, the Saudi government is reportedly mulling over the possibility of pursuing its own nuclear weapons program, precisely due to its security fears from Iran. The Wall Street Journal reported on May 7 that Saudi officials feel that the 10-year restrictions on Iran’s uranium and centrifuge stockpile included in the framework agreement will not be enough to permanently block Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. “We prefer a region without nuclear weapons. But if Iran does it, nothing can prevent us from doing it too, not even the international community,” Abdullah al Askar, a former top Saudi official on foreign affairs told WSJ.
 
Meanwhile, the Obama administration is also seeking to beef up the nuclear deal to counter criticism from Congressional opponents. U.S. negotiators are hoping to include provisions that automatically reinstate sanctions if Iran violates the terms of a deal, removing the need to go back to the UN for consensus, where Russia and China could block a return to sanctions.
 
What to make of all of this? The Obama administration has an increasingly small needle to thread. With boisterous opposition from Israel, Congressional Republicans, and now perhaps much of the GCC, the U.S. government is in a race against the clock to come to terms with Iran before the whole thing falls apart.
 
The one thing going for it is the fact that Iran itself is signaling its enthusiasm for a post-sanctions reality. The Iranian government is secretly courting western oil firms for investment, which could only be possible if a deal is reached. The same is true for a dramatic rise in oil production. The National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) projected its production would rise to 5 million barrels per day by 2020, up from 2.7 million barrels per day last year. Again, that will only be possible if Iran successfully attracts billions of dollars in new investment. The desire to see sanctions lifted could make Iran more amenable at the negotiating table.
 
But unless the U.S. can do more to make Saudi Arabia feel comfortable, the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) – whose support the U.S. has stated will be critical – may undermine a comprehensive deal with Iran.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-14/obama-becoming-global-joke-king-bahrain-snubs-us-president-meets-horse-instead

Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 12:09:33 AM
 #2

They probably just consider this summit a waste of time and are just awaiting for the next commander in chief to take over in a few years. It'll likely be more of the same unless Rand makes it in.
galdur (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 12:51:08 AM
 #3

Well, Kerry is in Moscow hat in hand begging Putin to help with solving the Ukraine disaster that the U.S. created in the first place. That after all the U.S. created catastrophes in the Middle East. It seems that nobody takes this chaotic empire seriously anymore. Even fruitcakes in charge of some medieval kingdoms, usually the empire´s must trusted allies, are turning their backs or so it seems for now.

Oil is up and the greenback is down now so these people can be cocky for the time being. But running some medieval style fiefdoms in the 21st century is probably a dubious proposition. The U.S. certainly has some contingency plans in place to topple those houses of cards quickly if the need arises.

Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 02:36:04 AM
 #4

Believe it or not, the american people as a whole are sick of all of this stuff overseas as the job market has been crumbling in the homeland and there's literally very few middle class jobs left for those that have been left on the margins of entitlement programs and such. Those who were locked in to decent work are doing fine but there are so many that aren't and they're starting to see the downward spiral that america has become because the govt has grown too large and is stifling anything new to provide relief to hard working folks. I live here and can see the decline as I drive down the road and see whose serving up orders at fast food joints and it's not always young people these days. Or, the people working at the big box stores trying to raise a family on less than $12 an hr. It's really sad to see america going down like this. And I mean the formerly middle class not the bullcrap in washington dc, even tho they're to blame.
galdur (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 04:15:15 AM
 #5

I believe it, what I find unbelievable is the patience of the people. They seem to endlessly give the nutsos in charge second chances. I guess they watch too much TV, which is totally brain damaging unfortunately. But maybe they´ll wake up when their bank accounts, stock holdings etc. start getting confiscated to fix the next collapse. Debt has ballooned since the last crisis and that debt was supposed to fix that crisis which was caused by over leverage in the first place. So, there´ll be no more money printing fixes. The FED is already leveraged like 80-1 and any interest rate hikes would relatively soon wipe out its capital base along with that of other major financial institutions. It´s a system totally painted into a corner and about the only thing left for Wash./Wall St. is to find someone else to blame for the next collapse. They won´t be responsible, they never are. Russia, China, the American People it´ll most likely be a mix of these culprits. If they start talking about a new Cyber Pearl Harbor that may hit better prepare for some desperate measures from those fruitcakes. Their history and record should be a warning.

There seem to have been some ominous signs lately. Apache helicopters flying low in formation over residential areas where they have no business, other military activity around the U.S. and those upcoming "exercises". Sometimes they go live when some scams for war and profit and diversion need to be pulled.
Let´s hope for the best.

bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 1217


View Profile
May 15, 2015, 05:59:51 AM
 #6

Big surprise there. I have always thought that the GCC nation heads are some of the most loyal slaves of the United States. The Saudis have enjoyed a more leveraged position, thanks to their oil wealth. But the other nations are completely dependent upon the US for their security. Perhaps they are starting to realize that being vassal states of the US is not the way to move forward. 
galdur (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 06:09:31 AM
 #7

Big surprise there. I have always thought that the GCC nation heads are some of the most loyal slaves of the United States. The Saudis have enjoyed a more leveraged position, thanks to their oil wealth. But the other nations are completely dependent upon the US for their security. Perhaps they are starting to realize that being vassal states of the US is not the way to move forward.  

Well, I tend to think that Ramsay has it right, They want to wait for a nutball suitable for their needs to come to the White House with the right entourage. Yes exactly. Bush3 or Clinton2. Clearly Obama and his crew have been a disappointment for them. Since both the Israelis and those medieval gling glongs are unhappy with Obama he can´t be all bad.

maku
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 06:20:35 AM
 #8

Well, Kerry is in Moscow hat in hand begging Putin to help with solving the Ukraine disaster that the U.S. created in the first place.

LOL Cheesy really?
No offence but You really don't know anything about this topic or You are just trolling. As for King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa skipping a meeting with Obama, that the way how politics are playing their cards and are balancing between "west" and "east". Putin also have been showing off lately and have been avoided by some
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32668511
galdur (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 06:51:51 AM
 #9

Well, Kerry is in Moscow hat in hand begging Putin to help with solving the Ukraine disaster that the U.S. created in the first place.

LOL Cheesy really?
No offence but You really don't know anything about this topic or You are just trolling. As for King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa skipping a meeting with Obama, that the way how politics are playing their cards and are balancing between "west" and "east". Putin also have been showing off lately and have been avoided by some
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32668511

I do know that by now only excessively gullible people take this Kerry guy seriously. Or anybody in charge of the U.S. anyway. The string of basket cases these nutjobs have created around the world for over a decade speaks volumes. Everything they´ve touched has turned to shit.

maku
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 07:18:57 AM
 #10

Well, Kerry is in Moscow hat in hand begging Putin to help with solving the Ukraine disaster that the U.S. created in the first place.

LOL Cheesy really?
No offence but You really don't know anything about this topic or You are just trolling. As for King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa skipping a meeting with Obama, that the way how politics are playing their cards and are balancing between "west" and "east". Putin also have been showing off lately and have been avoided by some
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32668511

I do know that by now only excessively gullible people take this Kerry guy seriously. Or anybody in charge of the U.S. anyway. The string of basket cases these nutjobs have created around the world for over a decade speaks volumes. Everything they´ve touched has turned to shit.

I'm not going to say that US government is righteous and others are bad, far from it. But bashing one side and blaming for everything is ridiculous. There are other countries that seek glory and world domination as well.

King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa skipped on Obama, instead he chosen horses and  Queen Elizabeth but UK is close wit US so he didn't run too far of.
galdur (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 15, 2015, 07:25:50 AM
 #11

Sorry, I have my hands full bashing psychopaths that have ruined country after country and killed and maimed millions of people. The retards/psychopaths that support these nutballs can bash the rest.

stevegreer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001

Official Zeitcoin community ambassador


View Profile
May 16, 2015, 03:48:14 AM
 #12

Can't say I blame him. If given the choice between going to a horse show or meeting with Barry, I would choose the horses.

bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 1217


View Profile
May 16, 2015, 05:47:56 AM
 #13

I'm not going to say that US government is righteous and others are bad, far from it. But bashing one side and blaming for everything is ridiculous. There are other countries that seek glory and world domination as well.

No other country has invaded and bombed as many countries as the United States has done. The Americans have invaded (either directly or indirectly) almost 50% of the UN member nations at least once. And addition to this, the United States is the only country which has used nuclear weapons against the civilian population.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!