Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 04:02:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cointelegraph on nems technical reference  (Read 395 times)
kodtycoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002



View Profile
May 18, 2015, 05:55:48 PM
 #1

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114289/nem-technical-reference-introduces-reputation-enhanced-proof-of-importance

             ▄▄██████▄
         ▄▄████████████
   ▄▄█████████▀▀   ▀████
 ▄███████████▄      ████
████▀   ▀▀██████▄▄▄████
████      ▄███████████▄
▀████▄▄▄████████▀▀▀████▄
 ▀███████████▀      ████
 ████▀▀▀██████▄▄   ▄███▀
████      ▀███████████▀
████▄   ▄▄█████████▀▀
 ████████████▀▀
  ▀██████▀▀
█████████████████

     ███

██████████

     ██████

███████████

     ███████████████

███████████████████
█████████████████

███   

██████████

██████   

███████████

███████████████   

███████████████████
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████▀███████▀   ▀▀▀▄█████
█████▌  ▀▀███▌       ▄█████

████▀               █████
█████▄              ███████
██████▄            ████████
███████▄▄        ▄█████████
█████▄▄       ▄████████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████████████▀▀███████
█████████████▀▀▀    ███████

███████▀▀▀   ▄▀   ███████
█████▄     ▄█▀     ████████
████████▄ █▀      █████████
█████████▌▐       █████████
██████████ ▄██▄  ██████████
████████████████▄██████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
███████▀           ▀███████
██████  ▄██▀▀▀▀▀█▀▄  ██████

█████  █▀  ▄▄▄  ▀█  █████
██████  █  █████  █  ██████
██████  █▄  ▀▀▀  ▄█  ██████
██████  ▀██▄▄▄▄▄██▀  ██████
███████▄           ▄███████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀  ▀     ▀  ▀███████

█████▌             ▐█████
██████    ██   ██    ██████
█████▌    ▀▀   ▀▀    ▐█████
██████▄  ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄  ▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
Zer0Sum
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 18, 2015, 10:51:27 PM
 #2


The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)...
But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost.

Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material...
It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM.

Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality  Sad Sad Sad
I am the guy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 237
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 19, 2015, 04:42:23 AM
 #3


The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)...
But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost.

Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material...
It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM.

Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality  Sad Sad Sad

Kinda sounds what's happening to crypto in general and not really specific to NEM.

patmast3r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001


View Profile
May 19, 2015, 08:51:30 AM
 #4


The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)...
But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost.

Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material...
It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM.

Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality  Sad Sad Sad

I find it to be the least circle jerk thing i've seen in quite a bit.
It just states facts instead of promising this revolution or that innovation.

Anway I don't like the article much. There are clearly some missunderstandings. Makes me wonder how much technical background the editors at ct have.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!