Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 04:19:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: APPEALS COURT BLOCKS OBAMA AMNESTY...  (Read 317 times)
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 27, 2015, 03:35:34 AM
 #1

Federal Panel Lets Injunction Against Obama’s Immigration Actions Stand

A federal appeals court on Tuesday denied the Obama administration’s request to lift a hold on the president’s executive actions on immigration, which would have granted protection from deportation as well as work permits to millions of immigrants in the country illegally.

Two of three judges on a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, left in place an injunction by a Federal District Court judge in Brownsville, Tex. The ruling comes in a lawsuit filed by Texas and 25 other states against actions President Obama took in November. Many of the initiatives were scheduled to take effect this month.

The appeals court found that the states had sufficient legal grounds to bring the lawsuit and that the administration had not shown that it would be harmed if the injunction remained in place and the programs were further delayed.

Also denied was a request by the administration to limit the injunction to the states bringing the lawsuit. The ruling is a second setback for programs the president hoped would be a major piece of his legacy, raising new uncertainty about whether they will take effect before the end of his term and casting doubts on the confidence of administration lawyers that their case was very strong.

Demonstrators outside federal appeals court in New Orleans last month. A panel of the court decided Tuesday not to lift a hold on President Obama's immigration executive actions. Credit Gerald Herbert/Associated Press
The lawsuit was filed in December, and on Feb. 16, Judge Andrew S. Hanen of Federal District Court in Brownsville ordered a preliminary injunction on the programs while he ruled on the constitutional issues in the suit.

In a statement, Ken Paxton, the attorney general of Texas, said Mr. Obama had tried to impose “a drastic change in immigration policy” without the consent of Congress. The appeals court decision is “a victory for those committed to preserving the rule of law in America,” Mr. Paxton said. “We will continue to fight the brazen lawlessness that has become a trademark of the Obama administration.”

More...http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/us/fifth-circuit-court-of-appeals-rules-on-obama-immigration-plan.html
1714839545
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714839545

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714839545
Reply with quote  #2

1714839545
Report to moderator
1714839545
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714839545

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714839545
Reply with quote  #2

1714839545
Report to moderator
1714839545
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714839545

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714839545
Reply with quote  #2

1714839545
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714839545
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714839545

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714839545
Reply with quote  #2

1714839545
Report to moderator
1714839545
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714839545

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714839545
Reply with quote  #2

1714839545
Report to moderator
Harry Hood
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 27, 2015, 04:49:49 AM
 #2

Great post, this demonstrates the beauty of the US Government!

The President can declare one way to rule and the Supreme Court can overrule him because he didn't gain enough support (essentially) from Congress. No fighting (political bickering aside), no revolts, no violent protest, no war...just acceptance that this is how the political process of checks and balances should work.

No one person in the US has unilateral authority over all others - this is a perfect example. Thanks for sharing!

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!