new moon landing hoax documentary. 2015.

[slaveforanunnak1]

https://vimeo.com/126206380'


Please respectfully post all the issues that you see with his arguments. Not reasons why you think we actually did go to the moon, but what is factually wrong with his evidence.

Thanks

[1715203311]

1715203311

[Leeroy Jenkins]

Part 1: shadows are easily explained through many mundane ways (use your imagination). This doesn't suggest anything hoaxy.
Part 2: I admit, while the astronaut's behavior is weird - there may be another - less hoaxy - explanation. Other than swinging by free-motion momentum, I'll refrain from suggesting alternative non-atmospheric possibilities. This doesn't seem to suggest anything hoaxy, but it is weird.
Part 3: If the cloth was damp and the plate was wiped while the cabin was pressurized, I'd say that invalidates this whole line of argument. The three photos he in the end says were "absolutely perfect" also had some minor defects if you actually looked at the blue smudges/blotches. So the liar here is the guy making who made this little hackumentry.
Part 4: The guy did not push back on his head. He clearly fucking grabbed his hand! Are you fucking blind!?

Ok, I've seen enough. This is bullshit.

[Vod]

How can one claim we didn't land on the moon?

Anyone, with the proper equipment, can shoot a laser off the mirror that was left behind.

That's why science won over religion - anyone can prove science... it's not just blind faith.

[Gleb Gamow]

How can one claim we didn't land on the moon?

Anyone, with the proper equipment, can shoot a laser off the mirror that was left behind.

That's why science won over religion - anyone can prove science... it's not just blind faith.

But, what if the mirror was placed on the moon eons ago by the Vodians?


"So, you really are a Vodian."

[notbatman]

"Drinking the Kool-Aid" is a figure of speech commonly used in North America that refers to a person or group holding an unquestioned belief, argument, or philosophy without critical examination. It could also refer to knowingly going along with a doomed or dangerous idea because of peer pressure. The phrase oftentimes carries a negative connotation when applied to an individual or group. It can also be used ironically or humorously to refer to accepting an idea or changing a preference due to popularity, peer pressure, or persuasion. The phrase derives from the November 1978 Jonestown deaths, in which over 900 members of the Peoples Temple, who were followers of Jim Jones, committed suicide by drinking a mixture of a powdered soft drink flavoring agent laced with cyanide. Although the powder used in the incident included Flavor Aid, it was commonly referred to as Kool-Aid due to the latter's status as a genericized trademark.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid

[Leeroy Jenkins]

Yeah, just ask this guy. He's the poster boy for drinking the kool-aid.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=135662

[slaveforanunnak1]

Part 1: shadows are easily explained through many mundane ways (use your imagination). This doesn't suggest anything hoaxy.
Part 2: I admit, while the astronaut's behavior is weird - there may be another - less hoaxy - explanation. Other than swinging by free-motion momentum, I'll refrain from suggesting alternative non-atmospheric possibilities. This doesn't seem to suggest anything hoaxy, but it is weird.
Part 3: If the cloth was damp and the plate was wiped while the cabin was pressurized, I'd say that invalidates this whole line of argument. The three photos he in the end says were "absolutely perfect" also had some minor defects if you actually looked at the blue smudges/blotches. So the liar here is the guy making who made this little hackumentry.
Part 4: The guy did not push back on his head. He clearly fucking grabbed his hand! Are you fucking blind!?

Ok, I've seen enough. This is bullshit.

and the whole sound thing?

[slaveforanunnak1]

How can one claim we didn't land on the moon?

[i]Anyone[/i], with the proper equipment, can shoot a laser off the mirror that was left behind.

That's why science won over religion - anyone can prove science... it's not just blind faith.

Actually, anyone who believe nasa blindly without even asking a single question, or even reading the god damn wiki page on this claim, is just as bad as someone in the 1500s believing in the priests because they have a direct access to the holy!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment

The first successful tests were carried out in 1962 when a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology succeeded in observing laser pulses reflected from moon's surface using a laser with a millisecond pulse length. Similar measurements were obtained later the same year by a Soviet team at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory using a Q-switched ruby laser.[1] Greater accuracy was achieved following the installation of a retroreflector array on July 21, 1969, by the crew of Apollo 11, and two more retroreflector arrays left by the Apollo 14 and Apollo 15 missions have also contributed to the experiment.

So you see dear, you don't need mirrors to bounce a laser off of the moon! So the mirrors made it more "accurate", or maybe they just made better detectors. I question EVERYTHING. I've been around the sun nearly 40 times now and the older I get, the more i have to relearn. 

The same people who gave you your banking system, are the same people who are in charge of the military industrial complex and NASA (Google project paper-clip if you haven't already.)

[Oldminer]

https://vimeo.com/126206380'


Please respectfully post all the issues that you see with his arguments. Not reasons why you think we actually did go to the moon, but what is factually wrong with his evidence.

Thanks

Thanks for posting.

Obviously a very well researched and detailed expose of the hoax.

Fact is we couldnt land on the moon now, with all of our tech, let alone do it 50 years ago when todays calculator had more power than all the computers in Apollo 11. In fact, most of the attempts (while still on earth), to make the LEM stable and flyable ended in disaster less than 12 mths before Apollo 11's mission. Yet less than a year later we went to the moon and nothing, not 1 thing, that could have made the mission end in disaster (of which there were many), happened 

The meeting the said astronots had with the media after their return from the moon is an eye-opener if anyone hasnt seen it (see the movie 'A funny thing happened on the way to the moon'). Far from being confident, proud Americans that had just returned from the first moon landing, they were instead obviously feaful, withdrawn, hesistant, and couldnt even get their stories right when questioned by the media. They looked like 3 guys that couldnt wait to get the hell out of there. Additionally, before they even left the lunar lander on their return to Earth (due to quarantine), Armstrong couldnt even look at President Nixon standing outside the module.

The lie however has long been exposed, and the only people that still believe we actually went to the moon are those that refuse to accept the truth, the proof, and the facts.

[Leeroy Jenkins]

and the whole sound thing?

That's all you have to say despite what I showed to be bullshit? Funny how this Oldminer also shows up with nothing but bluster and bullshit to boot.

If this is the best evidence of a hoax you guys have, you are profoundly delusional and a danger to those around you.