Hilariousandco said "more people are abusing the campaign", but he only said my name in public. You can't say if I reported users abusing the campaign or not because the reports are not public, but the fact is hilarious don't say publicly other's peoples names, so I think there is a double standard(and as you said my word means nothing). Hilarious doesn't even notified me about this thread, giving me no chance of defense. He should open a thread about the coinomat signature abuse in general if
What the hell are you talking about? I haven't noticed any other users trying to cheat the coinomat campaign, just the ones mentioned in the op. There have been plenty of people making poor posts and this is exacerbated when they realise the op isn't keeping an eye on them, but I report them to coinomat and admins if appropriate and they're usually dealt with, but they're not scamming just spamming. Regardless of that, you need to stop trying to divert or pass blame on to others. This thread is about the accounts in the op that were caught abusing the campaign in a specific way in an attempt to get paid for posts they shouldn't have.
I don't see users banned for signature spam receiving negative trust from for being "signature scammers" from BadBear, or signature managers giving negative trust to users saying: "this user spammed quotes in the stake your bitcoin address thread and we needed to make posts in the thread doesn't count for the payout".
Stunna left several negatives for people trying to cheat his campaign and other members have left negative when users have been caught trying to cheat giveaways or promotions etc because it's dishonest. Sometimes users do get banned as well. Lots are banned for copying and pasting posts from either the forum or the net. This is both spam and scam because they're attempting to get paid for posts they aren't really making.
If a user is caught using multiple accounts in a signature campaign where multiple account is not allowed he only get his payment denied and gets banned from the signature campaign, but won't receive negative trust and won't be called signature scammer without even taking in consideration the whole picture, like you and others are doing, and they usually don't give back what they received before being caught/banned or whatever.
Having multiple accounts on signature campaigns isn't against the forum rules and I don't care whether someone has 100 accounts on the same campaign making 100 posts a day just as long as they're not spam. It wouldn't be a scam because they're not fraudulently taking money away, but you tried to game the system without putting the effort in (or minimal effort).
And in my opinions their behavior is much worse than mine because what they do is visible, while what I did is not visible. And most of the users that are punished after being caught change their behavior and don't abuse the forum.
The fact that the spam wasn't visible isn't the point, it's that you hid it in an attempt to game and cheat the system. And if you're not banned then you can continue to use the forum and we'll see if your behaviour changes.
I consider what I did signature campaign abuse, but not signature campaign scam. Scam is when some campaign manager don't pay the users, or when someone receive more by mistake and refuse to return the difference, and even to true scammers another chance is given if they repair what they did.
You can consider it whatever you want but it's a scam in mine and others eyes whether you want to admit it or not. You tried to cheat money from a campaign that you hadn't rightfully earned. You're only apologetic because you've been caught and your accounts are now ruined because of your greed and laziness and you've realised it wasn't worth the amount you took and figure it'll be better to return the amount that you defrauded rather than destroy accounts that are likely worth a couple of bitcoins not to mention the further money you can earn from them.
