Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 12:43:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2015-06-05] CT: Chinese Exchanges Reject Gavin Andresen’s 20 MB Block Size...  (Read 399 times)
pedrog (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
June 05, 2015, 09:48:20 PM
 #1

Chinese Exchanges Reject Gavin Andresen’s 20 MB Block Size Increase

Quote
Two of China's biggest bitcoin exchanges - BTCChina and Huobi - have voiced concerns over Bitcoin Core developer Gavin Andresen's proposal to raise the block size limit to 20 megabytes by next year.

Speaking to CoinTelegraph, both BTCChina as well as Huobi indicated that they believe any increase in Bitcoin's block size limit should be approached conservatively. While both exchanges recognize that the current one megabyte block size limit is probably too small for Bitcoin to reach mainstream adoption, they are skeptical of Andresen's proposal.

BTCChina and Huobi shared concerns that a jump to 20 megabytes might be too big, while suggesting that a more sustainable long term solution should be sought after.

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114481/chinese-exchanges-reject-gavin-andresens-20-mb-block-size-increase

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715388218
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715388218

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715388218
Reply with quote  #2

1715388218
Report to moderator
1715388218
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715388218

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715388218
Reply with quote  #2

1715388218
Report to moderator
1715388218
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715388218

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715388218
Reply with quote  #2

1715388218
Report to moderator
PolarPoint
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 05, 2015, 09:58:24 PM
 #2

They must know the 20M is actually a maximum limit, not a minimum requirement. I think they are rejecting a non-core fork, not rejecting the 20M cap idea.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!