Gultahin
Member
 Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
۩۞۩ secondstrade.com ★
|
 |
June 13, 2015, 04:35:34 PM |
|
yeah.. i just won on secondstrade.com its not my biggest but it is significant one. i was sure of winning as when btc was going down i was sure it will rise in next few seconds..  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yoloer808
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 113
Web dev for hire
|
|
June 13, 2015, 05:27:28 PM |
|
yeah.. i just won on secondstrade.com its not my biggest but it is significant one. i was sure of winning as when btc was going down i was sure it will rise in next few seconds.. shameless plug.. |
|
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
June 13, 2015, 06:30:16 PM |
|
I don't play on martinage system a lot, but once i had 8 losses in a row on 50% chance, and had no more funds to continue because my starting bet was pretty high.
If you are playing it tho, try rolling with 0 BTC (if it's allowed, if not, just put 1 sat), and wait for the loosing streak before you actually make a real bet.
In the end, you may loose again of course, but statistically your chances to win should be bigger. Naturally, play long enough, and the loosing streak is bound to happen sooner or later, so it's best not to be too greedy.
I thought no one would fall for the Monte Carlo fallacy anymore  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacyTrue and at a dice site the chance of the next roll being in a range is not reduced by the roll beofre, to say it in clear words, the previous roll doesn't affect the roll after thats how you get so many loss streak. No, there is no true reduction or influence in a roll by previous rolls made, but to some statistic we all believe in, the chance of failiure should be smaller - by my logic atleast. Dont you think so ? cheers |
|
|
|
|
monbux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
|
|
June 13, 2015, 06:35:07 PM |
|
I believe it was 16 or 17 losses, with my starting bid at 0.00001 BTC. I wasn't watching at the time it was actually happening but a couple seconds later I glanced at it and freaked out, haha
|
|
|
|
|
Gultahin
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
۩۞۩ secondstrade.com ★
|
|
June 13, 2015, 06:38:43 PM |
|
my staring bid 0.00002 and won 0.002..loved this time... unable to stop my heart from boiling...  |
|
|
|
|
siwakotisaurav (OP)
|
|
June 13, 2015, 09:33:11 PM |
|
I don't play on martinage system a lot, but once i had 8 losses in a row on 50% chance, and had no more funds to continue because my starting bet was pretty high.
If you are playing it tho, try rolling with 0 BTC (if it's allowed, if not, just put 1 sat), and wait for the loosing streak before you actually make a real bet.
In the end, you may loose again of course, but statistically your chances to win should be bigger. Naturally, play long enough, and the loosing streak is bound to happen sooner or later, so it's best not to be too greedy.
I thought no one would fall for the Monte Carlo fallacy anymore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacyTrue and at a dice site the chance of the next roll being in a range is not reduced by the roll beofre, to say it in clear words, the previous roll doesn't affect the roll after thats how you get so many loss streak. No, there is no true reduction or influence in a roll by previous rolls made, but to some statistic we all believe in, the chance of failiure should be smaller - by my logic atleast. Dont you think so ? cheers Hehe true as well man. Lost a few mbtcs thinking the same thing at 1.2x. |
|
|
|
|
ambitlons
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2015, 09:46:59 PM |
|
lost 26 and won the 27th
|
|
|
|
|
EvenMatt
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
★secondstrade.com★
|
|
June 13, 2015, 09:50:28 PM |
|
i played some one armed bandits. and lost all my coins. now i know why they call it one armed bandit  |
|
|
|
aniglo
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
@OldHiall LuckyBit
|
|
June 13, 2015, 10:57:02 PM |
|
my longest losing streak that ended with the victory -17 ... the longest of which ended in disaster 32 (i lost almost 6btc) ehh...
|
|
|
|
|
|
moriartybitcoin
|
|
June 14, 2015, 12:46:36 AM |
|
my longest losing streak that ended with the victory -17 ... the longest of which ended in disaster 32 (i lost almost 6btc) ehh...
32 red? May i know how much is your base bet, your multiplier and multiplier on loss? And what site did it happened? |
|
|
|
|
lexuz
|
|
June 14, 2015, 02:20:32 AM |
|
I not much experience on dice game because i just play dice when i dont know must i do. Best i got streak won 3 streak arrow. With little amout bet |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
June 14, 2015, 02:45:51 AM |
|
I think with 50/50 dice, I think I had like a 15 win streak but unfortunately I kept decreasing my bet size after he win assuming the next roll would be a loser.
And same with a losing streak, I think I had a 15-16 lose streak
|
|
|
|
PenguinFire
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
That Darn Cat
|
|
June 14, 2015, 03:44:55 AM |
|
In 50/50 dice the biggest streak I ever earned was 12. If only it was wins instead of losses.  |
|
|
|
aniglo
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
@OldHiall LuckyBit
|
|
June 15, 2015, 09:37:44 AM |
|
my longest losing streak that ended with the victory -17 ... the longest of which ended in disaster 32 (i lost almost 6btc) ehh...
32 red? May i know how much is your base bet, your multiplier and multiplier on loss? And what site did it happened? i do not remember the basic rate - it was a long time ago...i play all night and change settings sometimes...i never again played so sharply on 999dice |
|
|
|
|
|
