slaveforanunnak1 (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2015, 06:04:38 PM |
|
no 12, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, 40, 42, 48, 54, 56, 60, or 1, 1, 2, 5, 15, 52, 203, 877 or 1, 1, 2, 5, 14, 42, 132, 429, 1430, 4862, 16796 or even 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34 Just fucking add seven! 1966, 1973, 1980, 1987, 1994, 2001, 2008, 2015? __________________________________________________ 1966 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1507281973 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973%E2%80%9374_stock_market_crash1980 http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ROHO/projects/debt/1980srecession.html1987 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Monday_%281987%291994 http://fortune.com/2013/02/03/the-great-bond-massacre-fortune-1994/You don't need to be an economist to see a pattern here! And I'm fairly certain everyone here is familiar with the .com bubble of 2001, and the 2008 housing "crisisisisis derp derp" Oh, and then you got this crazy bitch from IMF getting wet talking about sevens! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze5DxdbPlRYNow just keep in mind that bitcoin has NEVER seen an economic crisis. Last time we had one, bitcoin was in Satoshi's stomach! Brace yourselves.
|
|
|
|
lemipawa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1006
|
|
June 17, 2015, 06:20:31 PM |
|
That is an interesting pattern, but you can't be for certain that Bitcoin will have a crisis. In fact, you can be certain that there will be an economic crisis at all. Besides, Bitcoin kind of had one in 2013 when its price went through the roof and then crashed.
|
|
|
|
spazzdla
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2015, 06:21:14 PM |
|
no 12, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, 40, 42, 48, 54, 56, 60, or 1, 1, 2, 5, 15, 52, 203, 877 or 1, 1, 2, 5, 14, 42, 132, 429, 1430, 4862, 16796 or even 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34 Just fucking add seven! 1966, 1973, 1980, 1987, 1994, 2001, 2008, 2015? __________________________________________________ 1966 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1507281973 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973%E2%80%9374_stock_market_crash1980 http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ROHO/projects/debt/1980srecession.html1987 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Monday_%281987%291994 http://fortune.com/2013/02/03/the-great-bond-massacre-fortune-1994/You don't need to be an economist to see a pattern here! And I'm fairly certain everyone here is familiar with the .com bubble of 2001, and the 2008 housing "crisisisisis derp derp" Oh, and then you got this crazy bitch from IMF getting wet talking about sevens! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze5DxdbPlRYNow just keep in mind that bitcoin has NEVER seen an economic crisis. Last time we had one, bitcoin was in Satoshi's stomach! Brace yourselves. Martin Armstrong. 8.6 years.. this guy is a fucking BOSS
|
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 3417
|
|
June 17, 2015, 06:33:31 PM |
|
Selection bias.
What about 1990 (recession), 1997 (Asian crisis) and 1998 (Russian crisis)?
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1 (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2015, 06:33:42 PM |
|
That is an interesting pattern, but you can't be for certain that Bitcoin will have a crisis. In fact, you can be certain that there will be an economic crisis at all. Besides, Bitcoin kind of had one in 2013 when its price went through the roof and then crashed.
I think you misunderstood me. I'm starting to think that these things are engineered which means, yes, we will have another crash this year, but i don't mean a bitcoin economic crash. I mean a regular stock-market/derivative/futures/{insert-fancy-word-here} crash and bitcoin will be a way out for people.
|
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1 (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2015, 06:38:41 PM |
|
Selection bias.
What about 1990 (recession), 1997 (Asian crisis) and 1998 (Russian crisis)?
1990s recession was the lingering effects of black Monday (87) which continued on to the early 90s Also, as far as I know, the FED doesn't directly control Russian and the Asian markets.
|
|
|
|
lemipawa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1006
|
|
June 17, 2015, 06:56:28 PM |
|
1990s recession was the lingering effects of black Monday (87) which continued on to the early 90s Also, as far as I know, the FED doesn't directly control Russian and the Asian markets.
Neither do they control Bitcoin. Bitcoin is international and decentralized.
|
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1 (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2015, 08:20:42 PM |
|
1990s recession was the lingering effects of black Monday (87) which continued on to the early 90s Also, as far as I know, the FED doesn't directly control Russian and the Asian markets.
Neither do they control Bitcoin. Bitcoin is international and decentralized. Exactly! whats why we should be buckling up! This September is going to be epic for bitcoin price! Mark my words
|
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 3417
|
|
June 17, 2015, 08:39:03 PM |
|
Selection bias.
What about 1990 (recession), 1997 (Asian crisis) and 1998 (Russian crisis)?
1990s recession was the lingering effects of black Monday (87) which continued on to the early 90s Also, as far as I know, the FED doesn't directly control Russian and the Asian markets. The FED also does not directly control the American stock markets (1973 and 1987),
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1 (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2015, 09:37:22 PM |
|
Selection bias.
What about 1990 (recession), 1997 (Asian crisis) and 1998 (Russian crisis)?
1990s recession was the lingering effects of black Monday (87) which continued on to the early 90s Also, as far as I know, the FED doesn't directly control Russian and the Asian markets. The FED also does not directly control the American stock markets (1973 and 1987), Just the money supply! Which has nothing to do with stock markets! nothing at all! Got it! Go buy stocks man! go buy buy buy!!! It's a perfect time for you!
|
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 3417
|
|
June 18, 2015, 05:30:47 AM |
|
Selection bias.
What about 1990 (recession), 1997 (Asian crisis) and 1998 (Russian crisis)?
1990s recession was the lingering effects of black Monday (87) which continued on to the early 90s Also, as far as I know, the FED doesn't directly control Russian and the Asian markets. The FED also does not directly control the American stock markets (1973 and 1987), Just the money supply! Which has nothing to do with stock markets! nothing at all! Got it! Go buy stocks man! go buy buy buy!!! It's a perfect time for you! My point is that there is no 7-year pattern. You chose the events that fit a 7-year pattern and ignored the rest. That's called selection bias.
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1 (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2015, 06:26:02 AM |
|
Selection bias.
What about 1990 (recession), 1997 (Asian crisis) and 1998 (Russian crisis)?
1990s recession was the lingering effects of black Monday (87) which continued on to the early 90s Also, as far as I know, the FED doesn't directly control Russian and the Asian markets. The FED also does not directly control the American stock markets (1973 and 1987), Just the money supply! Which has nothing to do with stock markets! nothing at all! Got it! Go buy stocks man! go buy buy buy!!! It's a perfect time for you! My point is that there is no 7-year pattern. You chose the events that fit a 7-year pattern and ignored the rest. That's called selection bias. like I said, 1990 (recession) was part of the 1987 crash. You don't see a pattern eh? figures
|
|
|
|
|