Sr. Member account - 297 activity
Full Member account - 126 activity
Both have negative trust, but it can join signature campaigns.
Price: Let's start from 0.03 BTC ( Price is for both of them )
Does the negative trust come from members in the default trust list? I'm only asking because it seems that a lot of people put too much importance into ratings given by untrusted members (see the meta thread for examples) when in reality, their feedback would have little to no impact on the value of an account.
If the feedback isn't from default trust members, then I'd like to offer the first bid of 0.03 BTC.
EDIT: Also, it might be a good idea to state when the auction will end as well as the minimum bid increment.
What signature campaigns accept people with negative trust
And aren't them about to be banned?
What is the amount of neg trust they have(to know if it would be viable repair their trust) and post quality
I think not a lot of campaign that received a negative accounts with trust. and if menerimapun pay is reduced to 50%.
I suggest to think two times if you want to buy a trust account with neg. it's better to pay a little expensive but quality and good account
CloudMining.website's signature campaign is the only one I know of that accepts users that show a "Warning: Trade with extreme caution" tag. It pays 0.0007 BTC per post which is identical to Bitmixer's rates. However, those with negative trust can only post in Bitcoin Discussion and Beginners & Help since trust ratings aren't displayed in these parts of the forum. Also, it's only for senior members and above:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=917174The LuckyBit signature campaign might also accept negative trust users on a case-by-case basis:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671689
