os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
September 19, 2012, 02:57:00 AM |
|
sorry for being noob but what is the best pool to go with in terms of reward ?
There's not really one "best pool". Solving blocks is a random event after all. One pool may be having terrible luck while another is having great luck. So if you have allot of hash power you may want to split it between several pools. Kind of like diversifying your investment portfolio. Sam Thank you for your explanation, is that like pool hopping ? No. If you have multiple Rigs/FPGA/GPU's you could point each one at a different pool and mine full time on each pool. Or you could use Balancing or Load Balancing with CG Miner. That way your more likely to have better luck overall. Pool hopping is a very complex operation, I wouldn't recommend it for a noob. And it is very unpopular with some folks. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
September 19, 2012, 03:54:23 AM |
|
sorry for being noob but what is the best pool to go with in terms of reward ?
There's not really one "best pool". Solving blocks is a random event after all. One pool may be having terrible luck while another is having great luck. So if you have allot of hash power you may want to split it between several pools. Kind of like diversifying your investment portfolio. Sam Thank you for your explanation, is that like pool hopping ? No. If you have multiple Rigs/FPGA/GPU's you could point each one at a different pool and mine full time on each pool. Or you could use Balancing or Load Balancing with CG Miner. That way your more likely to have better luck overall. Pool hopping is a very complex operation, I wouldn't recommend it for a noob. And it is very unpopular with some folks. Sam Apart from the fact that having backup pools is good practice, for non PPS reward methods mining at multiple pools at the same time reduces your earnings variance. If you split your hashrate the right way, could even get less variance than you would mining proportionally at DeepBit alone, and come much closer to the equivalent PPS earnings much more quickly. tl;dr if you can mine in multiple pools at the same time in the right way without incurring penalties (eg increased stales from some proxies) then you'll receive average aggregated rewards closer to PPS without the PPS fee.
|
|
|
|
meebs
|
|
September 19, 2012, 08:49:14 PM |
|
Why do people not like fees? Maybe because they dont feel the services provided are worth a 3-10% tax on earnings.
When you actually calculate it out.. it is a SUBSTANTIAL income for the pool operator.
Say we have a 5% pool that does 2500ghash/s.
5% * 2500 = 125 g/hash worth of fees.
on my rig I am getting 1.7 ghash for about .6 BTC/day
125 / 1.7 * .6 btc = 44.17 BTC/day * 365 = 16122 btc/year.
at current exchange rates.. thats $170k USD/year, not chump change.
Of course, if a pool operator can explain how much it costs, how much time it requires etc than that might help miners understand why they are charged so much.
Of course the pools could be operated as a business and its just the owner making a nice living off of the services he provides...
Your calculations imply a degree of constancy which simply isn't there. 1. If you want to estimate yearly earnings, you have to assume that a pool will maintain a particular % of the network hashrate. 2. The USD/BTC exchange rate is not stable. Six months it was USD $2 per btc. 3. Extrapolating the yearly earnings of a pool from your own mining results is not a valid method. You should convert the hashrate to shares per day, convert that to expected blocks/day. Aside from that, you miss the point - of course the pool owner needs to have a "nice earning" from the services he provides - how else is he or she expected to take maintaining the service seriously? Maintaining a pool is a 7 day 24 hour job, and many of the larger pools employ people from different timezones to be on hand for miner queries and pool emergencies. You make very good points. I was attempting to explain what it seemed like from someone who doesnt understand what goes on for the pool side of things while at the same time curious as to how much effort is required to run a big pool. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Graet
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 20, 2012, 12:37:01 PM |
|
Data taken from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104664.0Current mining pool listings, 16th September 2012 Pool Hashrate Fee EclipseDGM* 1270 No fee Maxbtc 195 No fee Eligius 271 No fee Itzod 333 No fee Bitminter 1298 No fee Mkalinin 50 No fee P2pool 333 No fee Triplemining 196 No fee Mt. Red 507 No fee BitcoinPool 111 No fee Bitlc.net 77 No fee BTCmine 66 No fee ---- Total 4707 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pool Hashrate Fee Coinotron 60 2% OzcoinDGM* 821 3% Polmine 153 1% Ecki.net 59 1% 50BTC 2893 3% Bitclockers 282 8% Bitparking 181 2.5% BTCGuild 2547 5% BTCMP.com 53 4% DeepbitPPS* 10% EclipsePPS* 5% HHTT Pool 19 1 - 17% OzcoinPPS* 5% BTCWarp.com 31 0.5% DeepbitProp* 4122 3% Slush 1727 2% ---- Total 12948 The network hashrate at the time these stats were takes was around 20Thash So 20 - [4.7+12.9] = 2.4Thash of "Unknown" 2.4 + 4.7 = 7.1Thash not paying fees (assuming none of these miners are on a private pool that charges fees - I suspect there are some) 12.9Thash paying feesI know someone would love to do the exact maths - I have rounded and estimated a little - but I think this shows that a great majority of miners understand the needs for fees and are not fearful at all 13 of 25 charge fees (not including EMC PPS, 13 and a bit if you count that ) *I used Deepbit Proportional, EMC DGM and Ozcoin DGM hashrates rate when calculating as these stats are not split between payout methods. Cheers Graet .
|
|
|
|
Shadow383
|
|
September 20, 2012, 12:43:19 PM |
|
Data taken from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104664.0Current mining pool listings, 16th September 2012 Pool Hashrate Fee EclipseDGM* 1270 No fee Maxbtc 195 No fee Eligius 271 No fee Itzod 333 No fee Bitminter 1298 No fee Mkalinin 50 No fee P2pool 333 No fee Triplemining 196 No fee Mt. Red 507 No fee BitcoinPool 111 No fee Bitlc.net 77 No fee BTCmine 66 No fee ---- Total 4707 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pool Hashrate Fee Coinotron 60 2% OzcoinDGM* 821 3% Polmine 153 1% Ecki.net 59 1% 50BTC 2893 3% Bitclockers 282 8% Bitparking 181 2.5% BTCGuild 2547 5% BTCMP.com 53 4% DeepbitPPS* 10% EclipsePPS* 5% HHTT Pool 19 1 - 17% OzcoinPPS* 5% BTCWarp.com 31 0.5% DeepbitProp* 4122 3% Slush 1727 2% ---- Total 12948 The network hashrate at the time these stats were takes was around 20Thash So 20 - [4.7+12.9] = 2.4Thash of "Unknown" 2.4 + 4.7 = 7.1Thash not paying fees (assuming none of these miners are on a private pool that charges fees - I suspect there are some) 12.9Thash paying feesI know someone would love to do the exact maths - I have rounded and estimated a little - but I think this shows that a great majority of miners understand the needs for fees and are not fearful at all 13 of 25 charge fees (not including EMC PPS, 13 and a bit if you count that ) *I used Deepbit Proportional, EMC DGM and Ozcoin DGM hashrates rate when calculating as these stats are not split between payout methods. Cheers Graet . FYI, deepbit's hashrate is anywhere from 3850Gh/s to 4300Gh/s depending on whether they're being hopped at the time, and I know some of the bigger hopping proxies solo-mine when there's nowhere to hop, so that could add a few hundred Gh/s. Nice work though!
|
|
|
|
Mad7Scientist
|
|
October 01, 2012, 02:00:13 AM |
|
The consumer is foolish. Raise the price of the product and then put it on sale down to almost the original price and loads of people will buy it.
People on the Internet have become accustomed to getting web based accounts and services for free. They don't realize that with all the advertising and the future tricks the people who are offering the service have planned to trap their customers and force them to pay that they really aren't getting it for anywhere near free.
Look at how many people use Yahoo! Mail. It's a long way from being one of the better web mail providers and they make you pay $20 a year to use any more features than the web mail. Yahoo Mail used to offer free POP access which allowed them to grow their user base to huge numbers. Now they are one of the most expensive.
I mine on abcpool.co. It has a reasonable fee but it is reliable and most importantly the owners seem to be honest, unlike my experience at btcguild where I believe thousands of bitcoins were stolen because of "bad luck" which went on for days and days.
|
|
|
|
GernMiester
|
|
October 01, 2012, 03:30:46 AM |
|
more fee = less profit. scary.. not reading thread...
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 01, 2012, 04:44:05 AM |
|
I mine on abcpool.co. It has a reasonable fee but it is reliable and most importantly the owners seem to be honest, unlike my experience at btcguild where I believe thousands of bitcoins were stolen because of "bad luck" which went on for days and days.
Your belief means nothing. "Bad luck" often goes on for days and days. Why not prove that the "bad luck" was outside a given confidence interval? Prove that it is unlikely to P < 0.05 or < 0.01. Otherwise you're simply slandering a pool op.
|
|
|
|
mentalove
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2012, 12:47:47 AM |
|
i pay 5% at ozcoin. the guys on the irc are really helpful and awesome so i happily donate a bit to keep the show going.
|
|
|
|
thebitbabe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2012, 06:47:12 PM |
|
Well sometimes the smaller pools are better but it's really boils down to what you prefer
|
|
|
|
Mad7Scientist
|
|
October 04, 2012, 04:38:09 AM |
|
Your belief means nothing. "Bad luck" often goes on for days and days. Why not prove that the "bad luck" was outside a given confidence interval? Prove that it is unlikely to P < 0.05 or < 0.01. Otherwise you're simply slandering a pool op.
I did a whole thread on that last year. Some Poisson's formula or something like that was used to show that the odds of a 5 day streak of bad luck was like 1 in 200. And there were more unusual periods of luck that weren't calculated. It's been a while now and nobody seemed to care that they were getting ripped off so long as the pool advertized "0% fee".
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 04, 2012, 07:03:30 AM |
|
Your belief means nothing. "Bad luck" often goes on for days and days. Why not prove that the "bad luck" was outside a given confidence interval? Prove that it is unlikely to P < 0.05 or < 0.01. Otherwise you're simply slandering a pool op.
I did a whole thread on that last year. Some Poisson's formula or something like that was used to show that the odds of a 5 day streak of bad luck was like 1 in 200. And there were more unusual periods of luck that weren't calculated. It's been a while now and nobody seemed to care that they were getting ripped off so long as the pool advertized "0% fee". Post a link and I'll go over your calculations - I enjoy having new data to work with. But it is hard to get a reasonable ci in a 5 day period - I usually accumulate months of data before I have a useful ci. Check post on p2Pool and bitlc on http://organofcorti.blogspot.com. BTW, BTCGuild is PPS now - luck no longer plays a part.
|
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 06, 2012, 12:53:15 AM |
|
The data is not longer at the link in the OP. Do still have it on hand?
|
|
|
|
DobZombie
|
|
October 06, 2012, 10:47:09 AM |
|
Fees are a matter of preference... If you join a no fee server, and don't get much help, it might be good to join a fee server. You can get helpful benefits. also likewise, if you're on a fee server, and got getting any benefit out of it, then got to a no fee server, where even if you get ignored it'll cost ya nothin! Most pools do keep transaction fees, and I read somewhere that they usually take 1BTC for every block solved (which gets 50BTC for the pool) I'm quite happy with EclipseMC. No fee. I can buy credits to get a sms if something goes wrong (.1 bitcoin for 100 sms, BARGAIN!) I donate 1% of my profits, and will do more once I've paid off my mining equipment. We get looked after pretty good there. If you're after mining support, nothing beats http://www.bitcointalk.org/
|
Tip Me if believe BTC1 will hit $1 Million by 2030 1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
|
|
|
DobZombie
|
|
October 06, 2012, 10:49:28 AM |
|
also, DGM FTW!
only choose PPS if you absolutely have to have BTC coming in every few hours. Otherwise DGM pays you your proportion of what was earned when a block is solved
|
Tip Me if believe BTC1 will hit $1 Million by 2030 1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
|
|
|
Gatorhex
|
|
October 13, 2012, 12:14:19 PM |
|
If you want to get paid fast and regular and have good uptime fee paying pools are the way to go.
Free pools you have to wait for the blocks to be confirmed before you get paid and when the pool goes offline you will worry they have run off with your bits.
I think most newbies will start on free pools and slowly drift to the pay pools as they experience unreliability issues.
|
|
|
|
Zeek_W
|
|
October 13, 2012, 12:17:09 PM |
|
Greed
|
|
|
|
Mad7Scientist
|
|
October 15, 2012, 03:04:16 AM |
|
The data is not longer at the link in the OP. Do still have it on hand? No most of the data on http://l0ss.net/ was removed and then a few days later the site was completely taken down. I never saved it.
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
October 18, 2012, 06:13:27 AM |
|
I don't get it?? In the newbie forum most especially, pools without fees are preferred over those that take back a small fee.
Here's how I see it: Pools with fees are more reliable in the long run because they have some extra funding to keep their services up and running. Ones which do not incur such fees don't seem to have this safety net.
Am I missing something?
thats simple, most humans are selfish as shit, if they have to donate 1-3% they are getting mad and rage about it
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
|