paulie_w
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 06:37:01 PM |
|
nice work team. where to send my bitcoins to fund your work?
|
|
|
|
kjj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 08:09:52 PM |
|
Bad news, this new version hogging cpu, making my server unresponsive:
Its Debian Squeeze 64 bit.
Just during startup, or always?
|
17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8 I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs. You should too.
|
|
|
waspoza
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 08:51:17 PM |
|
Always. 30 minutes after startup was same thing.
|
|
|
|
Pieter Wuille
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1072
Merit: 1181
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 08:56:22 PM |
|
Always. 30 minutes after startup was same thing.
And earlier versions didn't have this problem?
|
I do Bitcoin stuff.
|
|
|
waspoza
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 08:59:06 PM |
|
Always. 30 minutes after startup was same thing.
And earlier versions didn't have this problem? Nop. This is version 0.6.3, 1% load: top - 23:03:33 up 260 days, 7 min, 2 users, load average: 0.56, 0.25, 0.12 Tasks: 152 total, 1 running, 151 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 1.0%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 75.5%id, 23.1%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.1%st Mem: 6033904k total, 5857288k used, 176616k free, 552244k buffers Swap: 488444k total, 488444k used, 0k free, 3166980k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 11915 web21 20 0 440m 15m 3996 S 2 0.3 0:00.07 apache2 30390 bitcoin 20 0 266m 96m 43m S 1 1.6 0:11.63 bitcoind 20600 mongodb 20 0 7014m 144m 85m S 0 2.5 55:38.28 mongod 30729 root 20 0 19120 1404 1016 R 0 0.0 0:00.07 top 1 root 20 0 8404 628 520 S 0 0.0 4:03.64 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 150:09.33 ksoftirqd/0 4 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 32:40.17 kworker/0:0 5 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kworker/u:0 6 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 7 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/1 8 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 9:48.57 kworker/1:0 9 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 174:30.29 ksoftirqd/1
|
|
|
|
grondilu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 09:08:09 PM |
|
Lots of new features and all. That's great. Thanks guys.
... BUT ...
The important september announcement is not that there is a troyan horse in the binary, allowing a secret retrieval of all private keys in order to reboot the block chain, is it?
I mean, everybody's so quick into jumping in every new version. Am I the only one worrying a bit about that?
|
|
|
|
David M
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 09:20:05 PM |
|
Am I the only one worrying a bit about that?
Only if you did not read the source. Personally, I run a simple file compare against the last build and look at the changes. It ain't called Open Source for nothing.
|
|
|
|
Adrian-x
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 09:25:11 PM |
|
Thanks, its running smoothly.
|
Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
|
|
|
fimp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 09:41:19 PM |
|
0.7 quits unexpectedly immediately after launch on my OSX 10.5.8.
Is anyone else having this issue?
|
|
|
|
The-Real-Link
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 10:08:43 PM |
|
Only using ~300MB of RAM for me. Seems slightly reduced so that's nice, even if not a big deal. The "Out of Sync" notifications are nice to see.
The options appears to be cleaned up a lot.
Thank you for the continued hard work!
|
Oh Loaded, who art up in Mt. Gox, hallowed be thy name! Thy dollars rain, thy will be done, on BTCUSD. Give us this day our daily 10% 30%, and forgive the bears, as we have bought their bitcoins. And lead us into quadruple digits
|
|
|
WikileaksDude
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 10:31:19 PM |
|
the new client is running very smooth.
_Amazing_ work.
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 10:36:22 PM |
|
* Add UI RPC console / debug window
Where is this? I can't seem to find it
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
MadSweeney
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 11:10:40 PM |
|
* Add UI RPC console / debug window
Where is this? I can't seem to find it
It's under 'Help' menu.
|
|
|
|
paulie_w
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2012, 11:25:07 PM |
|
gavin any chance of seeing big endian/little endian compatibility someday?
|
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4790
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2012, 12:30:03 AM |
|
Should I backup my wallet again just for safely?
There is no chance of my existing wallet getting over-written or anything is there?
It shouldn't over write your existing wallet.dat, but why wouldn't you back it up just in case? It is pretty easy to do, and if for some reason something unexpected should go wrong for you, saying "I thought you said it would be ok" won't bring back your coins.
|
|
|
|
kiba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1014
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2012, 12:41:46 AM |
|
Anybody got a plain English explanation?
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4578
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2012, 01:07:45 AM |
|
Bitcoin version 0.7.0 is now available for download at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.7.0/We recommend that everybody running prior versions of bitcoind/Bitcoin-Qt upgrade to this release. ... JSON-RPC API... * Remove deprecated RPC 'getblocknumber' * Remove superceded RPC 'getmemorypool' (see BIP 22, above)... I'd like to request people using bitcoind to NOT upgrade and force the devs to deal with changes properly. These 2 changes above are ridiculous. Can we expect the next version of bitcoin to remove other things that people are using and simply say - bad luck - see you later? Have any of the bitcoin devs ever worked in a real production environment? This sort of change suggests the answer to that question is 'no'. We already had a nightmare of problems back in April due to not dealing with change properly, why are we still seeing this lack of proper procedure here with this 0.7.0 release?
|
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4790
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2012, 01:13:29 AM |
|
. . . a real production environment . . . this 0.7.0 release?
From everything I've seen the bitcoin client has always appeared to me to be in Beta.
|
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2012, 01:24:49 AM |
|
. . . a real production environment . . . this 0.7.0 release?
From everything I've seen the bitcoin client has always appeared to me to be in Beta. Are you insinuating we shouldn't use beta software to do real work? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4578
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2012, 01:27:08 AM |
|
. . . a real production environment . . . this 0.7.0 release?
From everything I've seen the bitcoin client has always appeared to me to be in Beta. So - since the software is in beta the changes done shouldn't be treated appropriately? ... And ... yes your quote is trying to create a link between 2 things I said that were not linked at all ...
|
|
|
|
|