[POOL] HASHPOWER.CO - YAAMP CLONE - X11, X13, X15, Quark, Neoscrypt

[crackfoo]

You know the yaamp code. When the BTC show up in the balance isn't it real?

Nope.

As you can see here, this is their BTC balance:

http://hashpower.co/site/block?id=6

[joblo]

You know the yaamp code. When the BTC show up in the balance isn't it real?

Nope.

As you can see here, this is their BTC balance:

http://hashpower.co/site/block?id=6

I know I'm being picky but I appreciate your responses and consider you an authority.

Those numbers look weird but t makes no sense to display phantom block maturation and exchange
to BTC. And the fact remains before the crash they were real. The only visible difference after the crash
is no final payouts.

I guess time will tell but I hope you are arong because I have a BTC balance of DNET found before the crash
but matured  and exchanged after.

[palex]

Does HASHPOWER pay? I do not get payments  of 1CFaZVrKR6E1BKGepjuWg3A2HJppq1phEj

[crackfoo]

I know I'm being picky but I appreciate your responses and consider you an authority.

Those numbers look weird but t makes no sense to display phantom block maturation and exchange
to BTC. And the fact remains before the crash they were real. The only visible difference after the crash
is no final payouts.

I guess time will tell but I hope you are arong because I have a BTC balance of DNET found before the crash
but matured  and exchanged after.

Looks like their code doesn't have any validation of how much coins were "sold" for if even at all. So last check for them... is they sent X amount of currency to the exchange @ x.xxx BTC, credit user's their share. But in this case, it's totally wrong, except maybe how much their "selling" them for, but their block rewards are totally wrong so their "selling" at the price that miners would get on the correct chain and correct block value. So, chances are, they'll soon just wipe it all away.

[joblo]

I know I'm being picky but I appreciate your responses and consider you an authority.

Those numbers look weird but t makes no sense to display phantom block maturation and exchange
to BTC. And the fact remains before the crash they were real. The only visible difference after the crash
is no final payouts.

I guess time will tell but I hope you are arong because I have a BTC balance of DNET found before the crash
but matured  and exchanged after.

Looks like their code doesn't have any validation of how much coins were "sold" for if even at all. So last check for them... is they sent X amount of currency to the exchange @ x.xxx BTC, credit user's their share. But in this case, it's totally wrong, except maybe how much their "selling" them for, but their block rewards are totally wrong so their "selling" at the price that miners would get on the correct chain and correct block value. So, chances are, they'll soon just wipe it all away.

I love your analysis but I have to throw another dart.

I'm not sure I'm understanding this data correctly, you don't have it so I can't compare.

http://hashpower.co/site/block?id=1376

It shows the balance at 1.3M and the last 7 days produced 1.2M so the balance has been acumulating for
more than 7 days yet I got my last payout Monday at 16:00 EST, 3 days ago. That being the case I was
being payed in BTC while the DNET balance was already accumulating. So unless they are operating on some
kind of margin where they pay out BTC before they've actually sold the DNET they must be valid coins.

I also noticed that HP is not getting all the blocks on the alternate chain, most but not all. They aren't yours
because I found duplicate block numbers so someone else is mining on this chain.

I'm definitely suspicious but I don't see the typical red flags. I've never lost coins that have matured.
The only time I lost coins on HP was when they dropped MUE, but again it was only the immature coins
I lost.

At this point the only thing I'm convinced of is the blockchain has forked and your branch agrees with
the coin's roadmap. Until Monday HP was paying what they advertise until a system crash. When the
system came back up everything was functioning as it should be except there have been no payouts
since the crash. Coins including DNET continue to get found, mature and exchanged, just one small step
remaining.

Although there appears to be a critical issue with the DNET blockchain there is no direct link between it
and to the lack of any payouts since the crash. It is more likley the crash triggered the subsequent payout failures.

I understand what you are saying but there is too much conflicting evidence, I'm still hopeful I'll get my coins.

[AngryDwarf]

Thankfully, got a payout (even on the dodgy DNET) so I hope everybody else has got theirs.

[4x13]

Thankfully, got a payout (even on the dodgy DNET) so I hope everybody else has got theirs.

What exactly is Dodgy about DNET??

The issue you are experiencing with DNET, is that none of you have apparently updated your wallets since the mandatory update was posted on this thread on May 4th. and neither has this pool operator. so all the coins that have been mined since that date are on another fork...

People should read the threads... I feel for you guys...

Do Not Mine DNET here until they update their pool..

[joblo]

Thankfully, got a payout (even on the dodgy DNET) so I hope everybody else has got theirs.

What exactly is Dodgy about DNET??

The issue you are experiencing with DNET, is that none of you have apparently updated your wallets since the mandatory update was posted on this thread on May 4th. and neither has this pool operator. so all the coins that have been mined since that date are on another fork...

People should read the threads... I feel for you guys...

Do Not Mine DNET here until they update their pool..

There's definitely something dodgy about DNET but as long as I'm getting paid I don't care. Wallet? What wallet?
HP autoexchanges to BTC for me.

The chain has forked and one branch in incorrectly producing 175 DNETs per block istead of 22.5. Why are coins
maturing and successfuly exchanged? Again as long as I'm getting paid I don't care.

How long will it last? Again, I don't care.

I'm just enjoying the ride while it lasts.

[4x13]

what exactly is Dodgy about DNET, explain

[joblo]

what exactly is Dodgy about DNET, explain

You've been around long enough, are you being deliberately obtuse?

Anyway, party's over, HP went down again and I don't expect it to some back with 175 DNET blocksize,
if at all. someone likely got stiffed.

[4x13]

what exactly is Dodgy about DNET, explain

You've been around long enough, are you being deliberately obtuse?

Anyway, party's over, HP went down again and I don't expect it to some back with 175 DNET blocksize,
if at all. someone likely got stiffed.

deliberately obtuse? No, I am asking you to explain why YOU think there is something dodgy about DNET. You made the statement, but I have yet to see any supporting facts as to why you made the statement..

[joblo]

what exactly is Dodgy about DNET, explain

You've been around long enough, are you being deliberately obtuse?

Anyway, party's over, HP went down again and I don't expect it to some back with 175 DNET blocksize,
if at all. someone likely got stiffed.

deliberately obtuse? No, I am asking you to explain why YOU think there is something dodgy about DNET. You made the statement, but I have yet to see any supporting facts as to why you made the statement..

Haven't you read anything I've written, or you have written in the past 2 days?

[4x13]

Those issues have nothing to do with the coin itself, they have to do with this pool, is that what you are referring to as dodgy??

[joblo]

Those issues have nothing to do with the coin itself, they have to do with this pool, is that what you are referring to as dodgy??

Anything to do with that coin, trading, mining, anything should be done with caution. And it could be the
coin itself. I don't know why two branches of a fork were validating the same block numbers but I can think
of two possibilities and one of them is not good for the coin.

Since you seem to be taking this personally I'm done discussing this issue.

Edit: Ijust noticed your sig now. I should have realized eralier that it was a personal matter for you.
I also think, if you're british your interpretation of "dodgy" is more  nefarious. Didn't mean
to offend.

[4x13]

Those issues have nothing to do with the coin itself, they have to do with this pool, is that what you are referring to as dodgy??

Anything to do with that coin, trading, mining, anything should be done with caution. And it could be the
coin itself. I don't know why two branches of a fork were validating the same block numbers but I can think
of two possibilities and one of them is not good for the coin.

Since you seem to be taking this personally I'm done discussing this issue.

Edit: Ijust noticed your sig now. I should have realized eralier that it was a personal matter for you.
I also think, if you're british your interpretation of "dodgy" is more  nefarious. Didn't mean
to offend.

No offense, I was asking to see if there was an issue with the coin I could help solve. and wanted to know if it was FUD or not.  I can assure you the issue is purely related to this pool. They have not updated to the latest wallet, and have been given notice a few times here to do so. they don't give any other means of contacting them, so until they decide to make the change, they will continue mining on a fork.

[joblo]

Those issues have nothing to do with the coin itself, they have to do with this pool, is that what you are referring to as dodgy??

Anything to do with that coin, trading, mining, anything should be done with caution. And it could be the
coin itself. I don't know why two branches of a fork were validating the same block numbers but I can think
of two possibilities and one of them is not good for the coin.

Since you seem to be taking this personally I'm done discussing this issue.

Edit: Ijust noticed your sig now. I should have realized eralier that it was a personal matter for you.
I also think, if you're british your interpretation of "dodgy" is more  nefarious. Didn't mean
to offend.

No offense, I was asking to see if there was an issue with the coin I could help solve. and wanted to know if it was FUD or not.  I can assure you the issue is purely related to this pool. They have not updated to the latest wallet, and have been given notice a few times here to do so. they don't give any other means of contacting them, so until they decide to make the change, they will continue mining on a fork.

Check your PM.

I hear you about the management of the pool. No one really knows if the admin ever reads the thread he created.
People, including coin devs advising of bew wallets, post here assuming someone is reading. Any help is provided
by the users.

By looking at the web page (before it went down) and all the disabled coins one has to wonder what is going
on behind the scenes.

[AngryDwarf]

Thankfully, got a payout (even on the dodgy DNET) so I hope everybody else has got theirs.

What exactly is Dodgy about DNET??

The issue you are experiencing with DNET, is that none of you have apparently updated your wallets since the mandatory update was posted on this thread on May 4th. and neither has this pool operator. so all the coins that have been mined since that date are on another fork...

People should read the threads... I feel for you guys...

Do Not Mine DNET here until they update their pool..

To clarify, I wasn't claiming that DNET is a dodgy coin, just that this pool appears to be mining on an incorrect fork (which makes the forked coins a bit dodgy). It was a BTC payout BTW.
This pool hasn't been very well supported for a while now. It is not my wallet to update. Neither will I be mining here anymore unless the situation changes.

[4x13]

understandable. coin-server.com is a solid pool for DNET, as is Suprnova's..

[atotex]

ADMIN PUT POOL BACK !!!!!!!      its HAVE LOT AS HO WANT TO MINE IN http://hashpower.co      iTS MOST PROFITAIBLE POOL FOR 30 DAY BACK AND BETER TO MAKE NEW COINS ON THIS POOL FROM zpool WHAT YOU CREATE BAT ITS NOT PROFITAIBLE

[jkminkov]

unlikely a coincidence - hashpower had a link to exchange safecex, both disappear at the same time, and safecex leads back to yaamp, who failed with running original pool...