tinybenis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 08:58:43 AM |
|
no I want your coins WTB 10k pulsar will pay .075 BTC send PM
|
|
|
|
Pulsardev70 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 10:23:22 AM |
|
Scorpio -
There was no conspiracy to limit our node's connections to cause a fork in our own coin, there is absolutely no benefit for a coin dev team to intentionally cause a fork on our own coin. We released the source code and windows wallet to the entire community at the same time. If a fork happened at block 1, it is because the first pool to mine a block was not synced to our network when it started mining - that is also not a realistic course of action - what pool would intentionally decide to run off on its own chain at the launch of a coin? The most likely scenario is that a fork happened at block 643 based on what we see on the block chain. Not having the block0001.dat the fork was on makes it impossible for us to compare blockhashes to confirm/deny exactly when it happened.
|
|
|
|
UltrA1
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
In Real World Use for Crypto We Trust!!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 10:30:31 AM |
|
any more nodes?
|
|
|
|
Pulsardev70 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 10:31:28 AM |
|
any more nodes?
Yes, we have three up and running now, all listed in the ANN. You can also add http://hashgoal.com/pool/PULS/ they are on the correct fork.
|
|
|
|
scorpio18
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Admin of CoinMiners Pools
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 10:54:54 AM |
|
Scorpio -
There was no conspiracy to limit our node's connections to cause a fork in our own coin, there is absolutely no benefit for a coin dev team to intentionally cause a fork on our own coin. We released the source code and windows wallet to the entire community at the same time. If a fork happened at block 1, it is because the first pool to mine a block was not synced to our network when it started mining - that is also not a realistic course of action - what pool would intentionally decide to run off on its own chain at the launch of a coin? The most likely scenario is that a fork happened at block 643 based on what we see on the block chain. Not having the block0001.dat the fork was on makes it impossible for us to compare blockhashes to confirm/deny exactly when it happened.
Dont try to hide that you mined like crazy 500 blocks on your "good fork" , why did you choose your fork and not the pools fork ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) there was a big hash on the pools fork but no you have chosen your own fork because you did not wanted to lose your 500 blocks mined . P.S: Please explain why your nodes was closing our connection , just 2 guys got connected to your nodes but the rest was getting this on debug log send version message: version 60015, blocks=0, us=xxxxxxxx:43208, them=188.166.121.151:43208, peer=188.166.121.151:43208 ThreadDNSAddressSeed exited socket closed disconnecting node 188.166.121.151:43208 trying connection 188.166.121.151:43208 lastseen=371182.9hrs connected 188.166.121.151:43208 send version message: version 60015, blocks=0, us=xxxxxxxx:43208, them=188.166.121.151:43208, peer=188.166.121.151:43208 socket closed trying connection 45.55.249.167:43208 lastseen=74.0hrs connect() failed after select(): Connection refused P.S : There was not fkc fork at block 643 , when i resynced my wallet to your fork i lost all my coins same for ocminer.
|
|
|
|
jambo110
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 10:58:10 AM |
|
Scorpio -
There was no conspiracy to limit our node's connections to cause a fork in our own coin, there is absolutely no benefit for a coin dev team to intentionally cause a fork on our own coin. We released the source code and windows wallet to the entire community at the same time. If a fork happened at block 1, it is because the first pool to mine a block was not synced to our network when it started mining - that is also not a realistic course of action - what pool would intentionally decide to run off on its own chain at the launch of a coin? The most likely scenario is that a fork happened at block 643 based on what we see on the block chain. Not having the block0001.dat the fork was on makes it impossible for us to compare blockhashes to confirm/deny exactly when it happened.
Dont try to hide that you mined like crazy 500 blocks on your "good fork" , why did you choose your fork and not the pools fork ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) there was a big hash on the pools fork but no you have chosen your own fork because you did not wanted to lose your 500 blocks mined . P.S: Please explain why your nodes was closing our connection , just 2 guys got connected to your nodes but the rest was getting this on debug log send version message: version 60015, blocks=0, us=xxxxxxxx:43208, them=188.166.121.151:43208, peer=188.166.121.151:43208 ThreadDNSAddressSeed exited socket closed disconnecting node 188.166.121.151:43208 trying connection 188.166.121.151:43208 lastseen=371182.9hrs connected 188.166.121.151:43208 send version message: version 60015, blocks=0, us=xxxxxxxx:43208, them=188.166.121.151:43208, peer=188.166.121.151:43208 socket closed trying connection 45.55.249.167:43208 lastseen=74.0hrs connect() failed after select(): Connection refused P.S : There was not fkc fork at block 643 , when i resynced my wallet to your fork i lost all my coins same for ocminer. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FetmqZvzyywRRS%2Fgiphy.gif&t=665&c=Em1eWwX63Tvazw)
|
|
|
|
superman1314
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 11:04:02 AM |
|
Scorpio -
There was no conspiracy to limit our node's connections to cause a fork in our own coin, there is absolutely no benefit for a coin dev team to intentionally cause a fork on our own coin. We released the source code and windows wallet to the entire community at the same time. If a fork happened at block 1, it is because the first pool to mine a block was not synced to our network when it started mining - that is also not a realistic course of action - what pool would intentionally decide to run off on its own chain at the launch of a coin? The most likely scenario is that a fork happened at block 643 based on what we see on the block chain. Not having the block0001.dat the fork was on makes it impossible for us to compare blockhashes to confirm/deny exactly when it happened.
We should use the fork of the pool to be the most fair. Please update your wallet. Using a fork in the pool
|
|
|
|
badam
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 11:07:00 AM |
|
Scorpio -
There was no conspiracy to limit our node's connections to cause a fork in our own coin, there is absolutely no benefit for a coin dev team to intentionally cause a fork on our own coin. We released the source code and windows wallet to the entire community at the same time. If a fork happened at block 1, it is because the first pool to mine a block was not synced to our network when it started mining - that is also not a realistic course of action - what pool would intentionally decide to run off on its own chain at the launch of a coin? The most likely scenario is that a fork happened at block 643 based on what we see on the block chain. Not having the block0001.dat the fork was on makes it impossible for us to compare blockhashes to confirm/deny exactly when it happened.
It was or not a conspiracy probably you were the only one able to mine the first few hundred blocks and the responsible for this is only you. If nodes were working well this couldn't happen. If you relaunched the coin once you could do it second time seeing that things even got worse, make a 1 day delay and take the time to test everything. Sorry but your open competition distribution failed and this will affect the future of the coin for sure
|
|
|
|
poolmn
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 11:13:45 AM |
|
Stop lying around about that fork at block, 500, 600 or 550, these are our hashes (probably same like Suprnova):
src/Pulsard getblockhash 10 0000000000192e348dc20459e1f5d78ba6d6ed495ad99d6d8ed38c994d4df1da src/Pulsard getblockhash 100 000000000002f1b8715b448388cb2614c5c8474c63fe1235915413ecf974e2ad src/Pulsard getblockhash 200 000000000035733a9fab3f06353fb48de3fbd5f9039f927fc554d11911405493 src/Pulsard getblockhash 300 000000000003b57710479df6a18d8afbedb237a07df78df71d30fb3e2473a277 src/Pulsard getblockhash 400 000000000003be70366891d1d375fe2abbbfe8880c05e1bc975b593a5fbf59e5 src/Pulsard getblockhash 500 00000000002af59ad69aaa9ef06987fe4838b7f4231e9c507d29dccb3770f649 src/Pulsard getblockhash 600 00000000000396a8cb50ea3706316d7453bf2f62d1b833ae2fcc025a72d2498f src/Pulsard getblockhash 700 0000000000038735cbd79b87a35308d1f168f559de503083d3b202866199cbd0 src/Pulsard getblockhash 800 000000000001084b8c1c622e0a9020c2125a6c8d271fd7ef087f93adc8901c18 src/Pulsard getblockhash 900 00000000000012ba1a4e18c9270b07d340e5d738addac72b7e0d6198d228cc7a src/Pulsard getblockhash 1000 00000000000002171dac10098152b26e2a5d38d4ff32ecf97fb9ccff3b8a36b3
They are completely different from a new synched wallet.
|
|
|
|
totoy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 11:15:49 AM Last edit: July 09, 2015, 04:34:20 PM by totoy |
|
no I want your coins WTB 10k pulsar will pay .075 BTC send PMI can sell you some if dev will use fork from pools ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
badam
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 11:18:51 AM |
|
Scorpio -
There was no conspiracy to limit our node's connections to cause a fork in our own coin, there is absolutely no benefit for a coin dev team to intentionally cause a fork on our own coin. We released the source code and windows wallet to the entire community at the same time. If a fork happened at block 1, it is because the first pool to mine a block was not synced to our network when it started mining - that is also not a realistic course of action - what pool would intentionally decide to run off on its own chain at the launch of a coin? The most likely scenario is that a fork happened at block 643 based on what we see on the block chain. Not having the block0001.dat the fork was on makes it impossible for us to compare blockhashes to confirm/deny exactly when it happened.
We should use the fork of the pool to be the most fair. Please update your wallet. Using a fork in the pool Well dev was open to use pools fork until it became clear that fork did not happen at block 643 so using pools fork dev would loose all his mined coins. BTW most pools resynced their wallet to devs fork so unless they saved the previous forks blockchain i don't think there is much hope that it can be taken back. I may be wrong though
|
|
|
|
lahlor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 02:07:38 PM |
|
Hello all, we are proud to be now a member of the Pulsar Community and created a second pool. Welcome to miningpool.ccChange the Pool to mine different coins over the top left dropdown.Our pools mainpage www.miningpool.ccPulsar Pool // Algo: SHA256 stratum+tcp://pulsar.mininigpool.cc:9478 hey thanks for the pool but whats going on with payments? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) didn't receive any for past 2 hours... and you didn't respond to pm.. (okay i got response, waiting...) We are investingating issues in the backend. Your shares and hashrate are safe and we will fix things ASAP. Payouts disabled, you will not receive any coins to your offline wallet for the time being With the new wallet everything is working fine. You can put your miners back to our pool. Sorry for all circumstances!!
|
|
|
|
samspaces
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1030
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 04:58:27 PM |
|
How to compile wallet on windows ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) source is brore its not compile with mingw You could try compiling Linux in a sandbox.
|
|
|
|
lahlor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 06:03:58 PM |
|
How to compile wallet on windows ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) source is brore its not compile with mingw What error you get? Maybe we can help you if you post it here.
|
|
|
|
trader19
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 06:08:45 PM |
|
Hello all, we are proud to be now a member of the Pulsar Community and created a second pool. Welcome to miningpool.ccChange the Pool to mine different coins over the top left dropdown.Our pools mainpage www.miningpool.ccPulsar Pool // Algo: SHA256 stratum+tcp://pulsar.mininigpool.cc:9478 hey thanks for the pool but whats going on with payments? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) didn't receive any for past 2 hours... and you didn't respond to pm.. (okay i got response, waiting...) We are investingating issues in the backend. Your shares and hashrate are safe and we will fix things ASAP. Payouts disabled, you will not receive any coins to your offline wallet for the time being With the new wallet everything is working fine. You can put your miners back to our pool. Sorry for all circumstances!! thanks for fixing, back to mining. guys u missing easy blocks, may be worth it after all..
|
|
|
|
trader19
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 06:12:06 PM |
|
@dev can u please check if PoS needs fixing? still didn't get any PoS block..
|
|
|
|
trader19
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 10:12:02 PM |
|
@bct community
After reading all the post from dev i must say he has been very transparent and helpful from the beginning. Heck he even relaunched the Coin because some solo miners mined all the big rewards. Now before you all start crying and yelling about first 600 blocks instamine (about 300000 coins), you must be aware that after dev made a decision to continue with that chain also mining proceeded and that at very low diff because lack of interest. Continued mining generated far more coins than those first 600 blocks so don't say you didn't had a chance to get a nice chunk of PULS like i did. And at the time of this post pow still proceeding and diff still low and still good chance to get some easy blocks. I hope dev didn't get discouraged and will continue with this project. He has proven to be open to community suggestions and is very transparent, so instead trolling the dev get into mining before PoS starts, still time to catch some.
just my two bits.
|
|
|
|
badam
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2015, 10:52:21 PM |
|
@bct community
After reading all the post from dev i must say he has been very transparent and helpful from the beginning. Heck he even relaunched the Coin because some solo miners mined all the big rewards. Now before you all start crying and yelling about first 600 blocks instamine (about 300000 coins), you must be aware that after dev made a decision to continue with that chain also mining proceeded and that at very low diff because lack of interest. Continued mining generated far more coins than those first 600 blocks so don't say you didn't had a chance to get a nice chunk of PULS like i did. And at the time of this post pow still proceeding and diff still low and still good chance to get some easy blocks. I hope dev didn't get discouraged and will continue with this project. He has proven to be open to community suggestions and is very transparent, so instead trolling the dev get into mining before PoS starts, still time to catch some.
just my two bits.
Well just think about this, why is this better when dev alone mined all the high reward blocks compared to that when a few solo miners mined them, at least it was in more peoples hands now the dev alone owns about 30% of total POW supply. Would you mine a coin if it is launched with 30% premine? I don't think so...probably you would consider it as a joke. Now that's my two bits ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
Paycoinzzz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 09, 2015, 02:45:10 AM |
|
Well just think about this, why is this better when dev alone mined all the high reward blocks compared to that when a few solo miners mined them, at least it was in more peoples hands now the dev alone owns about 30% of total POW supply. Would you mine a coin if it is launched with 30% premine? I don't think so...probably you would consider it as a joke. Now that's my two bits ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Yes the usual fud about dev getting every block. Since you know no one ever solo mines. I know what your doing man your a senior member so i know you arent that dumb. Its just trolling. Solo miners who synced with nodes from the post were on the right chain the entire time you know.
|
|
|
|
SIX3P0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 09, 2015, 03:07:32 AM |
|
I know u guys wanna protect your investment but you know this coin is dead. There was 900 TH on pools fork and climbing. Ya he asked community what fork to go with, all said pool but than he decided to go with the 30 TH solo mining fork....obviously because he had more coins on that fork. Bad move losing most support and hash, which in turn lost most of the value of the coin.
Honestly whats 300,000(~1/3 supply) worth when it was mined at less than 30TH SHA256 in 15 min? And with almost all community packed up and gone, its been low hash for the rest of the time too. This coin had good chance but now looks like it wont even make an exchange.
|
|
|
|
|