Fury X mining performance

[desired_username]

I wonder if any of you tested the fury X with various mining algorithms?

[okg]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

[TheRealSteve]

Too bad they're still not testing against (ocl)vanitygen .. I mean, if it runs at all, of course

[alh]

Probably best if you take this to an AltCoin centric forum, rather than a Bitcoin centric forum.

[goosoodude]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

Can this be real? the differences are huges. Not only a couple percent. the difference from 450KHS to 22.37MHS are enourmous. I did not think that they are so different...

[djm34]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

Can this be real? the differences are huges. Not only a couple percent. the difference from 450KHS to 22.37MHS are enourmous. I did not think that they are so different...

yeah altcoins, they all looks the same 

[atp1916]

Why is Scrypt performance not on that list? 

Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards.

280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards )
280x could do 710-760khs
290/x could do 800-1000khs

[desired_username]

Why is Scrypt performance not on that list? 

Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards.

280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards )
280x could do 710-760khs
290/x could do 800-1000khs

Very good point. I hoped for some scrypt numbers too.

[Eliovp]

Why is Scrypt performance not on that list? 

Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards.

280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards )
280x could do 710-760khs
290/x could do 800-1000khs

Very good point. I hoped for some scrypt numbers too.

Well, as most know, every driver above 13.11 or so will give Hardware errors or bad hashrate when mining Scrypt.

13.11 drivers just simply do not work with Fury X cards.

I have 3 Fury's running and managed to get scrypt running without Hardware errors.

Here are the results.

I can see that the cards are not even doing their best to perform. If i run any other Algo the temps will go up to 45-50 Degrees.
I tried changing worksize, intensity, threads, with every change i did i got Hardware errors, bad results or even Freezing the system.

Results

http://s30.postimg.org/fs3zbmtmp/scrypt.png


Greetings!

[Eliovp]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

I did some new tests.

New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot
http://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.png

Will do some other tests later.

Greetings

[Eliovp]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

I did some new tests.

New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot

http://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.png

Will do some other tests later.

Greetings

Wow nice! What was the heat on one of those cards? Stable for long term or just a short term test?

The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot.

I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any..

Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes.

Greetings

[Eliovp]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

I did some new tests.

New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot


Will do some other tests later.

Greetings

Wow nice! What was the heat on one of those cards? Stable for long term or just a short term test?

The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot.

I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any..

Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes.

Greetings

33 just seems so damn low! The liquid cooling really keeps them that low even while hashing at 11mh/s? These cards could easily become king of the mining world when the prices dip a bit.

33 = low, i'm 100% sure that they can go higher, when i run my darkcoin mod on a 290x it goes to 7.7 Mhz, knowing that Wolf his mod easiliy reaches 9Mhz that means that my fury's should in theory easily touch 14Mhz..

The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them

[Eliovp]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

I did some new tests.

New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot


Will do some other tests later.

Greetings

Wow nice! What was the heat on one of those cards? Stable for long term or just a short term test?

The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot.

I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any..

Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes.

Greetings

33 just seems so damn low! The liquid cooling really keeps them that low even while hashing at 11mh/s? These cards could easily become king of the mining world when the prices dip a bit.

33 = low, i'm 100% sure that they can go higher, when i run my darkcoin mod on a 290x it goes to 7.7 Mhz, knowing that Wolf his mod easiliy reaches 9Mhz that means that my fury's should in theory easily touch 14Mhz..

The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them

Wow! What are your ambient temperatures? I know a lot of people who do multiple rigs have a room that gets pretty warm but this can't be the case with this rig right?

It's around 25 Degrees in my warehouse. 20 cards in total,  all of them under 70Degrees, (i keep em that way though..)

So yeah, the Fury's are at full power only 10-15 Degrees hotter then my space

[dominuspro]

The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them

Wow! What are your ambient temperatures? I know a lot of people who do multiple rigs have a room that gets pretty warm but this can't be the case with this rig right?

Nope. You are not right. The graphic card will dissipate the same amount of heat. Liquid or air cooling doesn't matter in such context. If the graphic card produces let's say 250W of heat it will dissipate 250W in your room anyway.

[fenomenhaa]

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

I did some new tests.

New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot

http://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.png

Will do some other tests later.

Greetings

Quiete good result for x11, What about Quark algo? And also which kernel and miner are you using?is tyhat open source or private? İ 'll buyt some new cards, i didn't decide to buy fury x or 970's .Your answer so important to choosing cards ))

[sp_]

Quiete good result for x11, What about Quark algo? And also which kernel and miner are you using?is tyhat open source or private? İ 'll buyt some new cards, i didn't decide to buy fury x or 970's .Your answer so important to choosing cards ))

On the furyx quark is doing 22 MHASH with the russian closed source miner.(5MHASH with the opensource miner)

2x 970 cards will cost around same as 1 furyx, and the hashrate is much higher. Lyra2re: 3.950 MHASH vs 420khash (9,4 times faster on the 970's)

Release 54

2 Gtx 970 / Nicehash (QUARK still the best payout BTC BTC   )
EVGA 04G-2974-KR GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB

QUARK (0.014 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
31 350 khash/s

LYRA2 (0.003 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 18 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
3950 khash/s VS 2383 khash/s Release53

QUBIT (0.006 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -a Qubit -o stratum+tcp://qubit.usa.nicehash.com:3344 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
25 500 khash/s

X11 (0.0087 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3336 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
16 450 khash/s

X13 (0.006135 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 19 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 600 khash/s

X15 (0.0071 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 200 khash/s

KECCAK (0.0024 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a Keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
878 800 khash/s


Thanks SP, djm34 and all other who help and contribute !!

[Eliovp]

Quiete good result for x11, What about Quark algo? And also which kernel and miner are you using?is tyhat open source or private? İ 'll buyt some new cards, i didn't decide to buy fury x or 970's .Your answer so important to choosing cards ))

On the furyx quark is doing 22 MHASH with the russian closed source miner.(5MHASH with the opensource miner)

2x 970 cards will cost around same as 1 furyx, and the hashrate is much higher. Lyra2re: 3.950 MHASH vs 420khash (9,4 times faster on the 970's)

Release 54

2 Gtx 970 / Nicehash (QUARK still the best payout BTC BTC   )
EVGA 04G-2974-KR GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB

QUARK (0.014 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
31 350 khash/s

LYRA2 (0.003 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 18 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
3950 khash/s VS 2383 khash/s Release53

QUBIT (0.006 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -a Qubit -o stratum+tcp://qubit.usa.nicehash.com:3344 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
25 500 khash/s

X11 (0.0087 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3336 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
16 450 khash/s

X13 (0.006135 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 19 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 600 khash/s

X15 (0.0071 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 200 khash/s

KECCAK (0.0024 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a Keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
878 800 khash/s


Thanks SP, djm34 and all other who help and contribute !!

True _sp, quark is only doing 23Mh. But this is with a non Fiji optimized binary.
If with the same source a fiji binary is compiled the hashrate will definitely hit 30 if not 35Mhz.

Regarding X11: with my mod i hit 11Mhz+, with the same mod i only get 7Mhz on a 290x. Knowing that i hit 9.5 mhz with wolf his mod/binary.
So knowing this, Fiji (fury x) will go much higher if optimized correct.

I'm waiting for Wolf to get his Fury X, then we will talk again


@fenomenhaa
It's my own X11 mod, but i'll release the binary if asked.

Greetings

[fenomenhaa]

Thanks M8's )))

@Eliovp We discussed about just over hashing speed, There is also Power consumption side too.Fury X sure needs less energy. Did you checked the power consumption from wall?

[sp_]

The furyx reference design has a tdp of 275W and the gtx 970 has a tdp of 150W.

[sp_]

Regarding X11: with my mod i hit 11Mhz+, with the same mod i only get 7Mhz on a 290x. Knowing that i hit 9.5 mhz with wolf his mod/binary.
So knowing this, Fiji (fury x) will go much higher if optimized correct.

I'm waiting for Wolf to get his Fury X, then we will talk again


@fenomenhaa
It's my own X11 mod, but i'll release the binary if asked.

Greetings

Interesting.

here are the hashrates for the gtx 980,gtx980ti and the titanx (reference cards, on standard clocks)

Tested with ccMiner 1.5.51 SP-MOD

The latest version(1.5.55) will give higher rates on lyra2,x11,quark etc



More at:

http://cryptomining-blog.com/4861-crypto-mining-performance-of-the-new-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti/