delete

[redsn0w]

I am stuck at 86% of accuracy (You have reported 1789 posts with 86% accuracy). However I also think that the accuracy is not the unique thing to consider, maybe also the 'ken' of more languages can help.

[Vod]

I have reported 408 posts with 98% accuracy.

Can't get much more accurate than that baby!   

[Blazed]

I have reported 408 posts with 98% accuracy.

Can't get much more accurate than that baby!   

That is indeed good but ckolivas had over 1000 reported post with a 99.4% accuracy rate when he was promoted to Staff!


~BCX~

You have reported 15 posts with 84% accuracy

Guessing I might not make the cut as the next Staff member? 

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I have reported 408 posts with 98% accuracy.

Can't get much more accurate than that baby!   

That is indeed good but ckolivas had over 1000 reported post with a 99.4% accuracy rate when he was promoted to Staff!


~BCX~

You have reported 15 posts with 84% accuracy

Guessing I might not make the cut as the next Staff member? 

Me neither - You have reported 50 posts with 88% accuracy

[ndnh]

I have reported 408 posts with 98% accuracy.

Can't get much more accurate than that baby!  

That is indeed good but ckolivas had over 1000 reported post with a 99.4% accuracy rate when he was promoted to Staff!


~BCX~

You have reported 15 posts with 84% accuracy

Guessing I might not make the cut as the next Staff member?  

Me neither - You have reported 50 posts with 88% accuracy

You have reported 61 posts with 78% accuracy (from 40% one or two years ago, that is pretty goood )

May be I should have stopped at "You have reported 1 posts with 100% accuracy"

[Omikifuse]

Are people still considering QS for moderator

[erikalui]

What's the point of bumping this thread? He can NEVER be a MOD now (atleast if the forum needs to be in a TRUSTWORTHY member's hands then he won't be appointed as one).

[tmfp]

What's the point of bumping this thread? He can NEVER be a MOD now (atleast if the forum needs to be in a TRUSTWORTHY member's hands then he won't be appointed as one).

Maybe it's a useful bump just to remind us that, as the man/woman/child says him/herself:

You shouldn't believe everything that others tell you on the internet

[tmfp]

you have reported 1,234,724 posts with 99.9% accuracy

see my previous post.

[Omikifuse]

Doods, this is a topic about nominating QS to staff, not to post your report accuracy.

(what would be a good idea for another topic, anyway)

[--Encrypted--]

Doods, this is a topic about nominating QS to staff, not to post your report accuracy.

(what would be a good idea for another topic, anyway)

there's a thread exactly for that.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1129097.0

[tspacepilot]

What's the point of bumping this thread? He can NEVER be a MOD now (atleast if the forum needs to be in a TRUSTWORTHY member's hands then he won't be appointed as one).

BCX bumped it.  I think he was sorta trying to take blame for this suggestion, which is actually very big of him considering how often he acted like a blind cheerleader for anything that QS proclaimed.

Love him or hate him

Anyone with more than two brain cells not fighting each other for survival of the fittest can clearly see Quickseller is a major positive for the forum.

I have seen numerous times that he has helped newbies and accurately answered hundreds of questions.

Undeniably the King of Scam Busing post Phinaeus Gage (RIP) and Vod.

He/She/It apparently has plenty of time to dedicate.

Therefore I nominate Quickseller for consideration of Moderator or Staff.

Thoughts

~BCX~

I removed Quickseller because he was acting to deceive people, and I can't, and won't, be a part of that (he wasn't banned) if I know about it.

Such an effen waste of potential.

Shame.

~BCX~

Am I allowed to say "I told you so"?

[hilariousandco]

I removed Quickseller because he was acting to deceive people, and I can't, and won't, be a part of that (he wasn't banned) if I know about it.

So, it's not a bannable offence to abuse the trust system by building up false/fake trust with the intention of deceiving members of BCT?

Scams aren't moderated and scammers aren't banned so this wouldn't be any different.

[everaja]

Are people still considering QS for moderator

Nah.. now the Flow direction has been changed, he has already been in a lots of shit and probably now not suitable to become a Moderator.
I guess Op should change the Tittle of the Thread.

[nutildah]

Now this thread is just about how Bitcoin Express is a terrible judge of character.

[Vod]

I openly admit my mistake here.

That's one thing QS never did. 

[unholycactus]

I openly admit my mistake here.

That's one thing QS never did.  

Because he doesn't think it was a mistake.
However, it's nice to see signs of maturity on bitcointalk like BitcoinEXpress's once in a while.

[Vod]

I openly admit my mistake here.

That's one thing QS never did.  

Because he doesn't think it was a mistake.
However, it's nice to see signs of maturity on bitcointalk like BitcoinEXpress's once in a while.

He got caught lying outright.  He never once apologized.  If he doesn't think lying is wrong, then I feel sorry for his future.

[ajrah]

Maybe it's about time to lock this thread since his/her chances to be a moderator in this forum is gone, unless BitcoinEXpress still wan'ts to nominate Quickseller as Moderator

[Brad Harrison]

Maybe it's about time to lock this thread since his/her chances to be a moderator in this forum is gone, unless BitcoinEXpress still wan'ts to nominate Quickseller as Moderator

I think that would be highly unlikely