|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
crazyearner
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
|
 |
July 20, 2015, 12:37:28 AM |
|
Seems all dated back and part of wiki leaks but that is sure heck a lot of coin to old in wallet and never spend any in that time maybe saving for a future whos ever it is |
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1131
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
July 20, 2015, 12:44:13 AM |
|
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated! |
|
|
--Encrypted--
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
|
|
July 20, 2015, 12:45:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
neurotypical (OP)
|
|
July 20, 2015, 12:46:03 AM |
|
Seems all dated back and part of wiki leaks but that is sure heck a lot of coin to old in wallet and never spend any in that time maybe saving for a future whos ever it is Well it's still recieving a lot of coins, the most recent transactions are a week ago. I googled and couldn't find much, I saw the address being mentioned in the chinese subforum. |
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
July 20, 2015, 12:48:33 AM |
|
It's a multisig address, so it could be possible that one of the signers refuses to sign or is missing. If it is, why are there so many transactions of 0.00001 BTC going into it? |
|
|
|
wadili89
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 20, 2015, 12:50:47 AM |
|
looking very suspecious i think not the biggest wallet but something looks fishy as all of the received transactions are of 0.00001 when 0.0001 is the transaction fee who will send 0.00001 ? i am not an expert but how come all of the received payments are of same value and never ever even 0.01 BTC was used from this wallet |
|
|
|
--Encrypted--
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
|
|
July 20, 2015, 12:52:01 AM |
|
If it is, why are there so many transactions of 0.00001 BTC going into it?
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/July_2015_flood_attackread the "motivation" those came from the spammers. which "donated" over 30 BTC to various sites. |
|
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1131
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
July 20, 2015, 12:56:19 AM |
|
looking very suspecious i think not the biggest wallet but something looks fishy as all of the received transactions are of 0.00001 when 0.0001 is the transaction fee who will send 0.00001 ? i am not an expert but how come all of the received payments are of same value and never ever even 0.01 BTC was used from this wallet Actually: 215,000.22165005 - 215,000.21655005 = 0.0051 was sent out of this address: https://blockchain.info/tx/cfdca5d75e6924e6e6082029eb873063c2e1ce623cb4d34b72eeef2e0f8e56d5This is the second transaction and the only transaction to ever send from this address. Presumably they were testing to make sure they could eventually send when they want to before they made the first big deposit of 20,000.00034: https://blockchain.info/tx/e52e2c2fb7e23b890cc9e6b21286f7df2f40ede0d918ebfe2c7763b1ce7eea3c |
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated! |
|
|
|
dollarneed
|
|
July 20, 2015, 01:05:59 AM |
|
these adress started tansaction in december 2014 and received 20,000 BTC but most of them are 0.00001 BTC i think he is a rich guy,so now he have more than 50 milion dollars oh my goodness its a lot of money i bet that he have lamborginhi or ferarri and private jet plane,he can buy anything he want
|
|
|
|
|
cellard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1250
|
|
July 20, 2015, 01:27:51 AM |
|
looking very suspecious i think not the biggest wallet but something looks fishy as all of the received transactions are of 0.00001 when 0.0001 is the transaction fee who will send 0.00001 ? i am not an expert but how come all of the received payments are of same value and never ever even 0.01 BTC was used from this wallet Maybe those are dust transactions from a spam test? That or BurrtW's theory of a testing before sending a big ass transaction. |
|
|
|
|
coinableS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1179
|
|
July 20, 2015, 01:31:01 AM |
|
Whether it's finex or wiki leaks or whoever at least they are keeping it secure in a multi-sig address. Not long ago all the largest addresses were in standard addresses, and now there are more and more multi-sig. Good to see.
|
|
|
|
Genesys
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 20, 2015, 02:09:09 AM |
|
There is no way to find out for sure why this address is getting so many transactions? That is crazy and insane. No wonder the flood this month is keeping me from getting my transactions to complete still since July 10th, they just keep resetting to the day before time and date and says 0 confirmations everyday since. This stink  |
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
July 20, 2015, 02:12:48 AM |
|
100% positive it belongs to BitFinex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANdr0id
|
|
July 20, 2015, 02:21:08 AM |
|
Then that makes sense for an exchange to hold and have continuous micro transactions funneling through this address. Thanks for this observation. Now some people can sleep soundly tonight  |
|
|
|
|
|
Beliathon
|
|
July 20, 2015, 02:22:00 AM |
|
Oh, don't mind that. It's just my weekend petticash spending wallet.  |
|
|
|
ransomer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
July 20, 2015, 02:32:50 AM |
|
And in 'testing' that they can send the btc they have put the important information online and compromised the security. |
|
|
|
|
|
yeponlyone
|
|
July 20, 2015, 02:40:28 AM |
|
100% positive it belongs to BitFinex.
Why would it belong to BitFinex...? I find no relation to all the micro-transactions going in day after day? |
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
July 20, 2015, 03:01:23 AM |
|
100% positive it belongs to BitFinex.
Why would it belong to BitFinex...? I find no relation to all the micro-transactions going in day after day? Apparently the people behind the spam attack were sending the dust transactions to many publicly known addresses. One such is this one. Wiki Leaks and many others have also been receiving those transactions as well as known brainwallet ones. As for why, I don't know. |
|
|
|
|
yeponlyone
|
|
July 20, 2015, 04:26:32 AM |
|
100% positive it belongs to BitFinex.
Why would it belong to BitFinex...? I find no relation to all the micro-transactions going in day after day? Apparently the people behind the spam attack were sending the dust transactions to many publicly known addresses. One such is this one. Wiki Leaks and many others have also been receiving those transactions as well as known brainwallet ones. As for why, I don't know. Ok, thanks for the clarification, it makes sense not just to direct them to a burn address. If the spammers read this, please consider to send it to address 18XWhBj2pNJLqNCJ3PezKbFC4Vys5rjeD6 which I control. I would appreciate it very much  Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
