Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 08:14:18 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: ISIS' Image Problem?  (Read 1465 times)
Epileptic_Neurosurgeon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 22, 2015, 10:03:06 AM
 #21

ISIS bans execution videos because of image backlash?

Quote from: http[Suspicious link removed
cution-videos-isis/2015/07/20/id/657960/]

ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has banned any more execution videos by the Islamic State, but the orders reportedly have created a division with the organization's ranks.

ARA News reported that, according to sources, al-Baghdadi was responding to the feelings of Muslims who regarded the videos as "disgusting and scary to children."

...

"Some of IS militants supported Baghdadi's decision, taking into consideration criticism of the public that describes scenes of beheadings as barbaric," wrote ARA News' Jan Nasro. "While other militants rejected the decision saying that such scenes are meant to intimidate their enemies, represented by western powers, and not the common folk."

According to the website Middle East Eye.net, a number of Arabic-language news agencies said on Friday that Baghdadi explained his decision in a statement delivered to media offices in Syria and Iraq.

The website said Baghdadi ordered that his followers don't include scenes of the actual executions in their videos and limit them to moments before or after the act.

Full Article: http[Suspicious link removed]cution-videos-isis/2015/07/20/id/657960/

Sounds like banning the execution part of the videos is to prevent eroding popular support. Cuz what would they be if they lost that?




whats the point?.. they are still killing people
like removing the part that they are beheading people will change their image as  non violent org.

They don't need to necessarily be regarded as a non violent organisation, they just need to be accepted in the region as the authority of the region. The point would be to keep the violence on a level that instills fear but is not barbaric enough to significantly lower public support and provoke rebellions.
And if they become accepted as the authority of the region, the rest of the world has little choice but to negotiate and enter diplomatic relations with them. Which is why measures should be taken now, before it's too late.
jaysabi (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115


★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
July 23, 2015, 02:52:02 PM
 #22

ISIS bans execution videos because of image backlash?

Quote from: http[Suspicious link removed
cution-videos-isis/2015/07/20/id/657960/]

ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has banned any more execution videos by the Islamic State, but the orders reportedly have created a division with the organization's ranks.

ARA News reported that, according to sources, al-Baghdadi was responding to the feelings of Muslims who regarded the videos as "disgusting and scary to children."

...

"Some of IS militants supported Baghdadi's decision, taking into consideration criticism of the public that describes scenes of beheadings as barbaric," wrote ARA News' Jan Nasro. "While other militants rejected the decision saying that such scenes are meant to intimidate their enemies, represented by western powers, and not the common folk."

According to the website Middle East Eye.net, a number of Arabic-language news agencies said on Friday that Baghdadi explained his decision in a statement delivered to media offices in Syria and Iraq.

The website said Baghdadi ordered that his followers don't include scenes of the actual executions in their videos and limit them to moments before or after the act.

Full Article: http[Suspicious link removed]cution-videos-isis/2015/07/20/id/657960/

Sounds like banning the execution part of the videos is to prevent eroding popular support. Cuz what would they be if they lost that?




whats the point?.. they are still killing people
like removing the part that they are beheading people will change their image as  non violent org.

They don't need to necessarily be regarded as a non violent organisation, they just need to be accepted in the region as the authority of the region. The point would be to keep the violence on a level that instills fear but is not barbaric enough to significantly lower public support and provoke rebellions.
And if they become accepted as the authority of the region, the rest of the world has little choice but to negotiate and enter diplomatic relations with them. Which is why measures should be taken now, before it's too late.

Good point. I think that's kinda their motivation in their decision to not show beheadings. They want to instill fear to prevent people from contemplating violent resistance, but don't want to inspire so much anger and revulsion that people actually violently oppose them.

Sourgummies
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


Never ending parties are what Im into.


View Profile
July 25, 2015, 08:34:48 PM
 #23

Like a lemon feeling the squeeze...

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/coward-jihadi-john-flees-syria-6133737
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1015



View Profile
July 25, 2015, 08:47:49 PM
 #24


Obviously heading back to UK. No need to worry. With our solid iron curtain of border control, there is no danger of him sneaking back in.


Spendulus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386



View Profile
July 26, 2015, 01:13:13 AM
 #25


Obviously heading back to UK. No need to worry. With our solid iron curtain of border control, there is no danger of him sneaking back in.



Well, look what we have in this thread now.


Full Article: http[Suspicious link removed]cution-videos-isis/2015/07/20/id/657960/

How about that.

Let's go a bit further.

Quote from: boring sock puppet removed zckjaerkawezcvn

Quote from: paid troll removed asdfopjwerzlkjweoiru
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 26, 2015, 05:08:12 AM
 #26

Obviously heading back to UK. No need to worry. With our solid iron curtain of border control, there is no danger of him sneaking back in.

That is a rational decision, right? If he remains in Raqqa, then he will be killed either by the Assad forces, or by his jealous colleagues in the ISIS. So right now, the United Kingdom is the safest place for him. He might get a 10-year sentence in a prison with xbox and internet, and he will be out in three or four years time.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!