The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation!

[MakingMoneyHoney]

Congressman Alan West saying, "The President is the Chief executive officer of this corporation called The United States of America"

The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation!

....To even begin to understand what has happened to the Republic, we must look backward in time to the period following the Civil War. We must go back to the year 1871, which was the beginning of the decline of the Republic. When we examine what happened during that time in our history, we begin to piece together this troubling, perplexing puzzle that is "America" — only then should we answer as to whether we are indeed a "free" people or not.

So, let's roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn't teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you'll stay awake for this lesson.


The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

"The Constitution for the united states of America".

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.

Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.

So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.

According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.

In other words, our government was created by and for "sovereigns" — the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign — remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: "government is subject to the consent of the governed" — that's supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays? I don't....

The District of Columbia ACT of 1871 Document

Another scanned Doc: Articles of Incorporation

Tat's Revolution: The District of Columbia ACT of 1871

[MakingMoneyHoney]

Governments Have Descended to the Level  of  Mere Private Corporations

(ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94) http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventure-complete-work-by-judge-dale.pdf

[4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper.

5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature.  Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do!

6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?

[8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]

Who knew it was a corporation? Why aren't we taught that in school?

[ridery99]

old news.

[Blawpaw]

Today, all government must work like a corporation. there is no more Politics but Economic politics... Governments are not the ones who take the decisions...
There is a corporate machine behind each and every Political Party. The ones who are ellected will eventually favor the corporation and not the citizens.

[MakingMoneyHoney]

old news.

If it was old news, all of the mainstream media would referring to THE UNITED STATES corporation on the news, not saying things like the "president of the United States of America", but the "Chief executive officer of this corporation."

If you took a poll how many people would say the US is a country vs corporation? I bet most get it wrong. If they did, it's not old news.

[s.mouse]

old news.

Yep. It's unfair to just blame America as greed and money spreads like a plague and always takes over its host, but America is just the grossest example of it. Sad thing is its citizens don't really care and that's why nothing will change as people are happy in their matrix of ignorance.

[Beliathon]

old news.

QFT

[TECSHARE]

The United States of America is a common law sovereign nation. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation. If you are born in the US and you have had a birth certificate issued, you own an incorporation. You, the natural human being, Bob Smith, are in possession of your person, BOB SMITH, which is a legal fiction used for the purposes of commercial law.  The difference between the two is that the first is ruled by common law (the constitution), while the latter is the jurisdiction of commercial maritime law or international commercial code. The current "justice" system completely relies upon you confusing the two. Learn the difference and free yourself. Once you learn the difference suddenly the law makes sense again, and you can use it to protect you, not just allow it to be enforced upon you.

[redsn0w]

Where is the third option of the poll  ? Yes , No and "what are you talking about?".

[MakingMoneyHoney]

The United States of America is a common law sovereign nation. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation. If you are born in the US and you have had a birth certificate issued, you own an incorporation. You, the natural human being, Bob Smith, are in possession of your person, BOB SMITH, which is a legal fiction used for the purposes of commercial law.  The difference between the two is that the first is ruled by common law (the constitution), while the latter is the jurisdiction of commercial maritime law or international commercial code. The current "justice" system completely relies upon you confusing the two. Learn the difference and free yourself. Once you learn the difference suddenly the law make sense again, and you can use it to protect you, not just allow it to be enforced upon you.

Do you know of any really good information on the difference? They didn't teach this in school. I wonder why.... 

[TECSHARE]

I do, but it is a very complicated subject which is kind of synonymous with learning nearly as much about the law as a lawyer. It takes a long time to absorb enough of the material to get a true understanding of how it all works. If you are really interested keep plugging away at it and eventually one day it will just click and all that nonsense will start making sense. Here are a few links to get you started.

Admiralty/maritime/contract/UCC law = law of the ocean
Common/constitutional/civil rights law= law of the land

This was set up this way to create a system of jurisdiction for merchant ships at sea in international waters. The law of the land is a different jurisdiction than the law of the sea. Technically you can be under either jurisdiction regardless of your physical location (on land or sea). The judicial system currently operates under maritime law under color of common law, which depends completely on tricking people into giving their consent, which is equivalent to a contract, which places jurisdiction firmly within maritime law.

Just stop for a moment to go over the number of contracts you have with your government. Your birth certificate is a contract, your social security participation is a contract, your drivers license is a contract, your car registration is a contract, ffs, even receiving mail with a zip code on it is a contract that makes your home under federal jurisdiction!


http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/uniform-commercial-code-UCC.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Commercial_Code
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/admiralty

Michael Badnarik - Constitution Class (Complete) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp-48d_jSb4

Jordan Maxwell - International Maritime Admiralty Law radio interview  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o1xtAuVOtU

The Differences Between Common Law & Maritime Law & What They Are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-KzNkRLnCY

[MakingMoneyHoney]

I do, but it is a very complicated subject which is kind of synonymous with learning nearly as much about the law as a lawyer. It takes a long time to absorb enough of the material to get a true understanding of how it all works. If you are really interested keep plugging away at it and eventually one day it will just click and all that nonsense will start making sense. Here are a few links to get you started.

Admiralty/maritime/contract/UCC law = law of the ocean
Common/constitutional/civil rights law= law of the land

This was set up this way to create a system of jurisdiction for merchant ships at sea in international waters. The law of the land is a different jurisdiction than the law of the sea. Technically you can be under either jurisdiction regardless of your physical location (on land or sea). The judicial system currently operates under maritime law under color of common law, which depends completely on tricking people into giving their consent, which is equivalent to a contract, which places jurisdiction firmly within maritime law.

Just stop for a moment to go over the number of contracts you have with your government. Your birth certificate is a contract, your social security participation is a contract, your drivers license is a contract, your car registration is a contract, ffs, even receiving mail with a zip code on it is a contract that makes your home under federal jurisdiction!


http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/uniform-commercial-code-UCC.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Commercial_Code
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/admiralty

Michael Badnarik - Constitution Class (Complete) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp-48d_jSb4

Jordan Maxwell - International Maritime Admiralty Law radio interview  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o1xtAuVOtU

The Differences Between Common Law & Maritime Law & What They Are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-KzNkRLnCY

Thanks!

Edit: The video "The Differences Between Common Law & Maritime Law & What They Are" is really fascinating.

[MakingMoneyHoney]

Fox News - Corporation called UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

So what does this mean?

Urgent call – need to listen to this call…

Here's a little bit of the call explaining the situation as they see it. I believe the general idea is this: The citizens are corporations and there's a loan based on us as collateral and it's coming due. They don't have the money to pay the loan off and the humans as corporations are insured, and if they die a "natural death" those in charge will get money. It's a very interesting listen, you can hear it here: URGENT Sept 24 THE PEOPLE TAKING BACK THE NATION before the POPE signs the deal

(snippet below, you can read the transcript on the page, or watch the video for the audio)

...TD: What I am going to tell you is happening on an international level. The entire world is under a threat of conquest right now – so there are no rules, there are no laws. Everyone is vying for territory and control of custody of the Cestui que Vie Accounts. accounts. That is why you see refugees going to other places. They are being transferred to other territories. This is what’s happening. When the Pope leaves the UN it’s done. After that you will have a very hard time getting your country back.

So we are on a very limited time-span here. Documents are being drawn for the entire nation. The soil needs to be maintained and controlled. That is the only way to do it — through the Doctrine of Conquest. It can be done on paper, but if they can test us on the soil you have to be able to maintain it. I think that is why a lot of you are here right now — is so we can control the soil of this country — and that is every state.

Each person on this Earth at birth is worth $50,000 in gold and that is paid for out of the Vatican. Every refugee you see being transferred is worth $50,000 in gold. That is put up under a bond that is hypothicated 20 -40- 1000 times into a Cestui que Vie account. That is what they are going after — the territory and the Cestui que Vie account.

(What is Cestui que Vie? http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/18-19/11/introduction?view=extent).

Because it is a Cestui que Vie account they cannot actually kill you. It has to be done indirect. So you are going to start seeing natural disasters. You are going to see biological and chemical weapons. So it is not from a natural cause. This is what they have to do to get the payout on the insurance policy and get the Cestui que Vie Tust accounts.

If they actually murder you, they do not get access to the Cestui que Vie accounts. So the majority of what they are planning to do is by indirect means. That is going to start soon and you will see it ramp up toward the end of the year or the beginning of next year. From what I can tell it is going to be very severe in high population areas worldwide. It’s not just us — it’s the entire Earth.

We have a document that we are working on that can free this country and place everything in secure hands for a transitional phase, but once again the soil has to be controlled. At this point, it starts in West Virginia. West Virginia has been defaulted and dishonored. They were given ample opportunity to secure. They failed to do so. They have unlawfully and illegally dismissed the case from the public record. They are now not accepting filings.

The final filing we did placed every corporation reporting to be government in West Virginia as a defendant. Through the (?) principle documents they have defaulted. I defaulted them in 2011, 2012, 2013, personally. They were done again just recently by the three of us — so they have no legal or lawful right to exist at this point.

They will receive a piece of paper telling them Thursday they have been conquered and that it is over for them. They will receive another document shortly telling them to vacate. They will be given a very short time to vacate. At that point they need to be removed.

That is what we are looking for in West Virginia. At that point, if we can show a competent structure in place, that the people are not rebelling against, the military will accept the civil authority order and will not aid and abet the killing of Americans at the end of this year. They [the military] are the only ones that can deliver the biological weapons and chemicals. That is why we need a civil authority in-place very rapidly to give the stand-down order.

At that point they can be given the order to assist us in the cleanup of this mess we have found ourselves in....

[Lenore]

Well now this is interesting.  I knew there were 2 different documents.  Learned this in college.  HS never taught this though.   I dont think they really want you to know.

If its a corporation and not a country.  I should be able to do as I please then right?  Laws wouldn't really matter.  Atleast in my way of thinking anyways.

[MakingMoneyHoney]

Well now this is interesting.  I knew there were 2 different documents.  Learned this in college.  HS never taught this though.   I dont think they really want you to know.

If its a corporation and not a country.  I should be able to do as I please then right?  Laws wouldn't really matter.  Atleast in my way of thinking anyways.

That is the case in a way. The martime laws should not apply to a natural person (a living man versus a corporation - that is you with your name all caps). If you watch this video there's a part where some people go to court for things and they handle it "correctly" and make the judge walk out and then leave free. It's very interesting. The Differences Between Common Law & Maritime Law & What They Are

[TECSHARE]

The United States of America is a common law country based upon the constitution. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation which operates within the jurisdiction of maritime law also known as contract law. Under common law you have rights. Under maritime contract law you can consent to nearly anything, voiding your rights. The trick that our government is trying to pull now days is to obfuscate the difference between these two jurisdictions of law and manipulate you into agreeing to give up your rights via contract. In this manner they can operate under color of common law while only being restricted to any agreement that they can formulate and manipulate you into providing your consent to.

It is a rigged game, but once you know which game you are playing you can begin to find ways to extract your rights under either jurisdiction, or find ways to maintain common law jurisdiction in order to preserve your rights. This system was designed to keep the children as chattel property and allow the adults avenues to extract their rights. If you are not mature enough to study the law and extract your rights you are nothing but a child in the eyes of the law and you will be treated as such.

[bryant.coleman]

Nowadays, almost all the countries in the world are being controlled by big Corporations. For example, the United States is being controlled by Exxon, Goldman Sucks.etc, while Russia is being controlled by Gazprom and Rosneft. France is being controlled by Total, while the United Kingdom is being ruled by the Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and HSBC.

[BADecker]

The United States is a country in the area of the 10 square miles of Washington, D.C.

The United States is a trust in corporation form having as its beneficiaries the people of America.

[apollofire]

Agree, There should be Economic Politics, Social Development Politics rather than Vote Seeking Politics.

[MakingMoneyHoney]

Video: Thomas David Deegan's Address Coverage and Call to Act

People leaving this corporation known as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. An interesting view. Remember, there is a plan for these people to try to come together in West Virginia later this week.