|
ikydesu
|
 |
August 04, 2015, 06:57:54 PM |
|
What happens to blockchain  They block explorer has been broken |
|
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 04, 2015, 07:03:12 PM |
|
What happens to blockchain They block explorer has been broken blockchain got some kind of serious issue with their nodes so it is showing some fake transaction which are not happened in real, block explorer working but not showing the accurate value of transaction while other block explorer working fine. |
|
|
|
|
--Encrypted--
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
|
|
August 04, 2015, 07:12:13 PM |
|
blockchain and their issues. I don't feel safe storing my btc there anymore. time to switch to electrum.
|
|
|
|
|
dothebeats
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1354
|
|
August 04, 2015, 07:18:27 PM |
|
blockchain and their issues. I don't feel safe storing my btc there anymore. time to switch to electrum.
You better did that back then. blockchain.info was known to have several bugs and security flaws for a time now, and it isn't even advisable to store your coins in an online wallet. The mobile app is fine, but with the recurring bugs and security issues, I don't think people would still be confident on doing business with blockchain.info. |
|
|
|
|
GermanGiant
|
|
August 04, 2015, 07:24:00 PM |
|
blockchain and their issues. I don't feel safe storing my btc there anymore. time to switch to electrum.
You better did that back then. blockchain.info was known to have several bugs and security flaws for a time now, and it isn't even advisable to store your coins in an online wallet. The mobile app is fine, but with the recurring bugs and security issues, I don't think people would still be confident on doing business with blockchain.info. There are not many good alternatives. As long as you have the private keys of your addresses on blockchain.info and you do not do address re-use, I dont see a reason to worry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
|
August 04, 2015, 08:03:59 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scaccomatt0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
https://cryptoworld.io
|
|
August 04, 2015, 08:16:06 PM |
|
i was excited like my first date and going to the first base  at the end it's better that those coins remain unspent |
|
|
|
spazzdla
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 04, 2015, 08:20:20 PM |
|
blockchain and their issues. I don't feel safe storing my btc there anymore. time to switch to electrum.
You only use one wallet type... why? Blockchain.info is the perfect "spending" wallet. Using it for cold storage is a terrabad idea though, terrabad. |
|
|
|
|
--Encrypted--
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
|
|
August 04, 2015, 08:26:17 PM |
|
blockchain and their issues. I don't feel safe storing my btc there anymore. time to switch to electrum.
You only use one wallet type... why? Blockchain.info is the perfect "spending" wallet. Using it for cold storage is a terrabad idea though, terrabad. I don't have any reason to use a cold storage at the moment (because I always spend my btc) so one wallet type is fine. and I've been wanting to switch to electrum for a while now, anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
americanpegasus
|
|
August 04, 2015, 09:55:10 PM |
|
This is exactly why we need Monero and private blockchains. This is a ridiculous issue to have.
|
Account is back under control of the real AmericanPegasus.
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
August 04, 2015, 10:07:11 PM |
|
This is exactly why we need Monero and private blockchains. This is a ridiculous issue to have.
If the coins really moved and it was unknown they did, the market wouldn't have the chance to move down so everyone could buy more coins... Downsides in everything, I guess  Still waiting for that statement from blockchain, genuinely curious about what happened. |
|
|
|
|
dothebeats
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1354
|
|
August 04, 2015, 10:10:50 PM |
|
This is exactly why we need Monero and private blockchains. This is a ridiculous issue to have.
If the coins really moved and it was unknown they did, the market wouldn't have the chance to move down so everyone could buy more coins... Downsides in everything, I guess Still waiting for that statement from blockchain, genuinely curious about what happened. Yeah the problem seems to be persisting and targeting the assumed addresses of Satoshi, which might cause some excitement and whatnot over the folks that are too eager to know who he/she is. I thought it's a pushtx API problem? |
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
August 04, 2015, 10:16:10 PM |
|
This is exactly why we need Monero and private blockchains. This is a ridiculous issue to have.
If the coins really moved and it was unknown they did, the market wouldn't have the chance to move down so everyone could buy more coins... Downsides in everything, I guess Still waiting for that statement from blockchain, genuinely curious about what happened. Yeah the problem seems to be persisting and targeting the assumed addresses of Satoshi, which might cause some excitement and whatnot over the folks that are too eager to know who he/she is. I thought it's a pushtx API problem? So it seems, but that's not an official blockchain source... |
|
|
|
|
dothebeats
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1354
|
|
August 04, 2015, 10:30:14 PM |
|
This is exactly why we need Monero and private blockchains. This is a ridiculous issue to have.
If the coins really moved and it was unknown they did, the market wouldn't have the chance to move down so everyone could buy more coins... Downsides in everything, I guess Still waiting for that statement from blockchain, genuinely curious about what happened. Yeah the problem seems to be persisting and targeting the assumed addresses of Satoshi, which might cause some excitement and whatnot over the folks that are too eager to know who he/she is. I thought it's a pushtx API problem? So it seems, but that's not an official blockchain source... Yep, until now no official reports from blockchain.info. Makes me wonder what is really happening with their service and block explorer. |
|
|
|
|
smiletyson
|
|
August 04, 2015, 10:56:31 PM |
|
It seems blockchain is releasing statement later today. Meanwhile they're only connected to 22 nodes. Maybe they're systems crashed and somehow some nodes were relaying fake info and they got those? Or maybe they were "trapped" connecting to nodes relaying fake information? Is this possible?
Yes it's possible to take fake info. But it's not possible pool them because you need "digital signature"... |
|
|
|
|
errornone
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
error
|
|
August 04, 2015, 11:03:45 PM |
|
satoshi only has 50 BTC? I thought he has 1 million of them. |
error
|
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3542
Merit: 6884
Just writing some code
|
|
August 05, 2015, 01:30:12 AM |
|
satoshi only has 50 BTC? I thought he has 1 million of them. He has a lot, estimated to be a little more than 1 million. However, his Bitcoin is spread over several hundreds, maybe thousands, of addresses when he was mining Bitcoin in the early days. |
|
|
|
Za1n
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
August 05, 2015, 02:28:15 AM |
|
About time he gets around to spending them. The sooner those mystery coins are in circulation the sooner they can get priced in the market and Bitcoin can take off. There is probably a lot of fear that if the market got too high in the future, say in the $10,000 per BTC range those millions would suddenly be shaken loose and the market dump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
