oh noes, isolation
lol for centuries, this has been one of the main argument for the socialist bs agenda: "if you are not with us you are alone.."
bouhouohouhouhouh pathetic.
the greatest minds have always been alone standing for their ideas, rejected by the majority of brainwashed sheeples.
you forkers will end up owned by the same corporations (but all together yeayyy), using a centralized system which security would be "under control" and some flashy ph0undation (or LaB, so fancyyy ^^) with their "governance" and "regulations".
so lol no GFY.
bitcoin is sovereign, if you dont like it, go ahead and use any
fork altcoin that suits your onchain-micro-transactions-coffee-spaming or just go with XT already.. but you wouldnt uh?
Again with the "
you only care about microtransactions" BS. Change the record already. I've stated enough times by now that your paranoia over microtransactions is just deflecting the issue:
People tend to make the assumption that a larger blocksize would encourage more microtransactions or other transactions sent without a fee. To an extent, that's possible (but not a certainty by any means), so there is a balance to be struck to ensure there is space enough for legitimate fee-paying transactions, but not so much space that most of the traffic being processed doesn't give any reward for the miners securing the network. 1MB almost certainly isn't enough, but how much is too much? That's where most of the discourse seems to focus, and rightly so.
Third party layers should be strictly reserved for micropayments and transactions that don't include a fee. And as much as small block proponents obsess about micropayments, they really aren't the issue. Even after they're swept under the carpet, Bitcoin still needs to support more than two-thirds of a floppy disk every ten minutes. If it doesn't, something else will.
Just about every single opponent of larger blocks is completely fixated on micro-payments and thinks that once those are swept under the carpet that the scalability issue is magically solved forever. That's just plain wrong. Larger blocks will become a necessity as the usage increases and prolonging the inevitable is only going to result in more disruption later.
Get it? It's. Not. About. Microtransactions.
altho it seems to me the gavinistas are the ones pretty alone in this nonsense..
You're the one who thinks you can have a system where you can ignore the wishes of miners, merchants, payment processors and users. You've made it
abundantly and abhorrently clear what your view of Bitcoin's future is and I'm pretty sure most people don't share it.