|
tarsua (OP)
|
 |
August 08, 2015, 08:21:11 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Xian01
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
|
|
August 08, 2015, 08:40:37 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
This is a horrible idea. No sarcasm. Default Trust should be organically and meticulously curated based on merit IMO. |
|
|
|
|
subSTRATA
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
|
|
August 08, 2015, 08:45:54 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things. |
theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
|
|
|
|
tarsua (OP)
|
|
August 08, 2015, 08:50:44 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things. As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it |
|
|
|
|
subSTRATA
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
|
|
August 08, 2015, 09:15:50 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things. As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it even if they are screened, who would be the central figure in deciding who should be on DT? the admins don't have time for that, and its unfair to put that responsibility onto the people already on DT. the system as it is now isnt the best, but its fine. |
theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
|
|
|
Blazed
Casascius Addict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
|
|
August 08, 2015, 09:16:59 PM |
|
Really bad idea since so many accounts are sold + account age has nothing to do with being trustworthy.
|
|
|
|
|
Zz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1077
|
|
August 08, 2015, 09:22:38 PM |
|
This is the worst idea I've ever read in this forum. Trust system is already manipulated. If they enable this it'll be a lot easier to abuse with sold Legendary accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tarsua (OP)
|
|
August 08, 2015, 09:41:07 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things. As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it even if they are screened, who would be the central figure in deciding who should be on DT? the admins don't have time for that, and its unfair to put that responsibility onto the people already on DT. the system as it is now isnt the best, but its fine. Naturally the forum could hire some workers for this This is the worst idea I've ever read in this forum. Trust system is already manipulated. If they enable this it'll be a lot easier to abuse with sold Legendary accounts.
Really bad idea since so many accounts are sold + account age has nothing to do with being trustworthy.
As said, they will be watched, if they slip they slide, so there will be no sense buying accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
EternalWingsofGod
|
|
August 08, 2015, 09:44:03 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
No just no It would set to many dependancies and a lot of problems including the fact that some might not have traded any goods/services cash with others among other cases. |
|
|
|
subSTRATA
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
|
|
August 08, 2015, 09:48:24 PM |
|
Naturally the forum could hire some workers for this
high potential for bribery/corruption with that. also, that would require the forum to pay people; where would that money come from? |
theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183
dogiecoin.com
|
|
August 08, 2015, 10:17:49 PM |
|
Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.
what do you guys think?
what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things. As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it Then that's not automatic, but uses turning Legendary as an arbitrary promotion point. Makes account selling even more valuable, gauranteed default trust accounts etc. Legendary is rare though, even I haven't reached it yet and by the time I do it'll probably get moved again. |
|
|
|
|
tarsua (OP)
|
|
August 08, 2015, 10:27:44 PM |
|
Naturally the forum could hire some workers for this
high potential for bribery/corruption with that. also, that would require the forum to pay people; where would that money come from? you cant bribe if you dont know who to bribe, the people who do this will be anonymous |
|
|
|
|
minifrij
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1267
In Memory of Zepher
|
|
August 08, 2015, 10:31:23 PM |
|
Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?
|
|
|
|
|
White sugar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 08, 2015, 10:51:08 PM |
|
TD is legendary or is close to be.
Since scammers are not banned, being legendary does not means you should go to default trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
tarsua (OP)
|
|
August 08, 2015, 11:48:26 PM |
|
Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?
If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller |
|
|
|
|
minifrij
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1267
In Memory of Zepher
|
|
August 08, 2015, 11:54:29 PM |
|
Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?
If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller People don't like being called out on their mistakes, Quickseller and the trust system is no exception to that. Besides, by your plan he would be getting on DT soon enough anyway. So how would it help? |
|
|
|
|
Blazed
Casascius Addict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
|
|
August 09, 2015, 12:02:06 AM |
|
Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?
If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller You see maybe 2-3 complaints...yet how many times do people leave feedback and not have issues? The trust system works fine here - no such thing as a perfect system for anything. No matter what someone always has to whine and complain about something. |
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
August 09, 2015, 12:02:31 AM |
|
Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?
If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller People don't like being called out on their mistakes, Quickseller and the trust system is no exception to that. People don't like being called out as scammers, especially in the middle of a scam attempt, especially when they think their scam attempt is about to be successful. |
|
|
|
|
|
tarsua (OP)
|
|
August 09, 2015, 12:08:58 AM |
|
more people on default trust= more people leave trust= less people complain about a specific person leaving them negative trust
|
|
|
|
|
subSTRATA
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
|
|
August 09, 2015, 12:13:53 AM |
|
more people on default trust= more people leave trust= less people complain about a specific person leaving them negative trust
i see it more as more people on DT = more people leaving neg trust = more complaints about people leaving neg trust. |
theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
|
|
|
|
