thebitcoinguy (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 09, 2015, 09:41:10 PM |
|
Bitcoin XT 0.11A supports larger block sizes than 1mb. It is now available in Windows 32bit, Windows 64bit and Mac binaries here: Official Bitcoin XT Google GroupXTnodes.comDownload links are available at both of the above sites. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
August 09, 2015, 09:43:36 PM |
|
Bitcoin XT 0.11A supports larger block sizes than 1mb. It is now available in Windows 32bit, Windows 64bit and Mac binaries here: Official Bitcoin XT Google GroupXTnodes.comDownload links are available at both of the above sites. How does one would use this, assuming it work, without moving to a fork? |
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1009
|
|
August 09, 2015, 09:48:00 PM |
|
Can't seem to find the changelog to see if this really has support for bigger block sizes. They used to post it on github, but can't seem to find it, any links?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tearfereon
|
|
August 09, 2015, 09:51:30 PM |
|
I grabbed my popcorn and watching the miners  Let's see which chinese miners will switch into it. |
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
August 09, 2015, 09:52:59 PM |
|
I grabbed my popcorn and watching the miners Let's see which chinese miners will switch into it. Oh noes. Not the Chinese breaking MORE things? xD Hmm. Think about it, if all of China switched to it. |
|
|
|
|
tearfereon
|
|
August 09, 2015, 09:54:07 PM |
|
I grabbed my popcorn and watching the miners Let's see which chinese miners will switch into it. Oh noes. Not the Chinese breaking MORE things? xD Hmm. Think about it, if all of China switched to it. Lately I've read about that, Chinese miners wants bigger blocks. But I don't remember the source, it might not be reliable. |
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
August 09, 2015, 09:57:04 PM |
|
I grabbed my popcorn and watching the miners Let's see which chinese miners will switch into it. Oh noes. Not the Chinese breaking MORE things? xD Hmm. Think about it, if all of China switched to it. Lately I've read about that, Chinese miners wants bigger blocks. But I don't remember the source, it might not be reliable. It's not a stretch, bigger block is a common feature of interest. But regardless. With the money the Chinese are making, i really doubt they would coalesce and jump on something so hazy. It's not like they aren't making bank already. |
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1009
|
|
August 09, 2015, 10:02:10 PM |
|
Releases website is here... I'll wait until it gets here and a full changelog is available 
|
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013
Welt Am Draht
|
|
August 09, 2015, 10:03:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AgentofCoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 09, 2015, 10:06:29 PM |
|
I grabbed my popcorn and watching the miners Let's see which chinese miners will switch into it. Oh noes. Not the Chinese breaking MORE things? xD Hmm. Think about it, if all of China switched to it. Lately I've read about that, Chinese miners wants bigger blocks. But I don't remember the source, it might not be reliable. I believe the major Chinese mining pools agreed on an initial 8mb raise, from the 1mb. But that was over a month or so ago. Who really knows what they will do and when they will do. |
I support a decentralized & unregulatable ledger first, with safe scaling over time.
Request a signed message if you are associating with anyone claiming to be me.
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
August 09, 2015, 10:07:29 PM |
|
That would be horrible, our posts count would be invalidated. ;') |
|
|
|
Velkro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1014
|
|
August 09, 2015, 11:26:01 PM |
|
How does one would use this, assuming it work, without moving to a fork?
Yea, sounds dangerous to begin with. I won't risk using other client than core. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
|
August 10, 2015, 07:41:12 AM |
|
This thread is a duplicate, please report/delete. Original XT thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1115016.0Please don't spam this forum with duplicate XT posts, as Gavinistas have been doing on reddit. |
██████████
██████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████
██████████
Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
DooMAD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 3126
Leave no FUD unchallenged
|
|
August 10, 2015, 10:32:14 AM |
|
Afraid of a little competition as usual? Not just scared of allowing the market to decide when it comes to a fork, but also scared of people posting in a competing thread? It's reassuring to see the lengths you feel you need to go to in order to defend your interests. I can't help but think you wouldn't be trying so hard if you weren't threatened by it. I think I'll stick to this thread. It doesn't smell of fear and desperation like yours does.  |
.
.HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013
Welt Am Draht
|
|
August 10, 2015, 12:09:56 PM |
|
That would be horrible, our posts count would be invalidated. ;') Well, quelle surprise. |
|
|
|
|
CoinaDay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
August 11, 2015, 02:21:54 AM |
|
Is Theymos not on the side of larger block sizes? I haven't seen any post by him about the subject recently.
Judging by his recent comments on /r/bitcoin, I'd have to presume he's at least not in favor of this fork. |
|
|
|
|
amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
|
|
August 11, 2015, 10:36:34 AM |
|
When the network split scheduled?
|
|
|
|
|
DooMAD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 3126
Leave no FUD unchallenged
|
|
August 11, 2015, 05:37:01 PM |
|
When the network split scheduled?
There isn't a set date. It happens automatically when enough nodes are running the code to support the larger blocksize. It's difficult to predict exactly when this will happen, but several pools are already pushing for it:   |
.
.HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
█
▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
August 12, 2015, 05:40:54 PM |
|
Hmm, so if it pass, there is no way to trigger a mandatory wallet update to prevent both chain to continue?
|
|
|
|
amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
|
|
August 12, 2015, 07:19:04 PM |
|
Hmm, so if it pass, there is no way to trigger a mandatory wallet update to prevent both chain to continue?
Forget the word "mandatory" talking about bitcoin. Everyone has a freedom to choose a fork. ...aaaand yes! You can choose both forks and double your coins! |
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
August 12, 2015, 07:52:45 PM |
|
Hmm, so if it pass, there is no way to trigger a mandatory wallet update to prevent both chain to continue?
Forget the word "mandatory" talking about bitcoin. Everyone has a freedom to choose a fork. ...aaaand yes! You can choose both forks and double your coins! There has been wallet updates labeled "Mandatory" before. And it wouldn't be double coins, the exchanges would be on one or the other. If both live it'd be BTC and BTC+ and it would crash the value of one if not both. |
|
|
|
|
