Kprawn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073
|
|
August 12, 2015, 09:46:49 AM |
|
How will banks influence thousands of people, who has a vested interest in keeping the value of Bitcoin to increase the cap and to run the new changes on the protocol? Nobody in their right mind would sabotage their own investment like that. The problem with many of the Alt coins is, that their total Cap of coins is way to large to sustain a high price. If you look at these stats http://coinmarketcap.com/ you could see why some coins will never have a huge value per coin... There is simply too much of it availlable and it will never be rare enough to reach Bitcoin's price level. A real competitor to Bitcoin will have a low amount of coins that would ever be released to increase it's value, with all the other things that influence it's demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
August 12, 2015, 10:46:25 AM |
|
Why would banks destroy it? if anything it would be the feds
the feds are not that much againsat bitcoin, maybe because they do not think it is a threat for now, and because in the case it will be they can always tax the shit out of it i think that many banks believe that bitcoin is done after the 1200 crush, they are not bothering with it so much
|
|
|
|
gogxmagog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1009
Ad maiora!
|
|
August 12, 2015, 11:26:02 AM |
|
If the bankers really wanted to kill it, they would refuse to do business with the exchanges. They refuse customers and clients all the time. If there was no speculation on BTC, no cash to drive its usage. It wouldn't be good for very much. Expensive pizzas and alpaca socks maybe, but every other retailer who accepts it today would have never arrived here. I like to believe BTC could replace cash. If you could get every thing you can get with money, with BTC, and no exceptions, it would simply be a transition, but there is this transitional phase we are in now, where cash and BTC are inextricably linked... I suppose it's necessary to get to BTC ubiquity, but by removing the cash part from the equation at this early point, would be the end.
How many here would be so excited about BTC if there were no way to buy or sell them? I'm sure there would be a few crypto-stalwarts but that would be it. People need buying power, failing that, they need value exchange for something that does, like cash
These are frustrating times, but imagine a future where you pay and get paid in BTC. Universally. No more third party banks. BTC is good for them too, obviously.
|
|
|
|
kpitti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 12, 2015, 11:43:38 AM |
|
Unless there is business related with Bitcoin then some bankers will continue to use it. I am not afraid that someone will have such power and convice all miners. This is just an theory.
|
|
|
|
mallard
|
|
August 12, 2015, 01:03:15 PM |
|
Thanks for the clickbait title.
|
|
|
|
eternalgloom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1283
|
|
August 12, 2015, 01:04:36 PM |
|
Maybe a stupid question but after the cap is reached, would it be profitable to mine for the fees? Would the default fee be set higher than it is now?
|
|
|
|
RodeoX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1145
The revolution will be monetized!
|
|
August 12, 2015, 03:04:29 PM |
|
I do not believe that banks CAN kill bitcoin. I still have never seen a viable plan to destroy the bitcoin protocol. A 51% attack to forge counterfeit coins is not viable, for example. It would cost many millions to buy all the hash power. At that point you would have to throw away all the profits you are making from mining and throw away all your hardware. All you get in return is bitcoin 2.0.
|
|
|
|
Derrike
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 12, 2015, 03:09:39 PM |
|
Yes If the 21 million market cap of bitcoin is increased then whole user base will not trust Bitcoin anymore. So if Bitcoin have to sustain, then developers can change or fork anything but not play with the 21 million limit of bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
Beliathon
|
|
August 12, 2015, 03:19:38 PM |
|
So all they have to do is convince all of us to change the protocol? Sounds fair to me. There is more chance of the Sun exploding tomorrow than convincing me.
Same
|
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
|
|
August 12, 2015, 03:25:32 PM |
|
So all they have to do is convince all of us to change the protocol? Sounds fair to me. There is more chance of the Sun exploding tomorrow than convincing me.
rofl mao
|
|
|
|
Hollingsworth
|
|
August 13, 2015, 06:50:15 AM |
|
I have 2 problems with your argument...
First, banks could never convince devs, miners, etc to devalue the worth of bitcoin. That would be financial suicide for the bitcoin infrastructure.
Secondly, why even choose that route when all banks have to do is keep forcing financial regulators to give more onerous and stifling regulations on bitcoin exchanges and merchants? That's already having major effect on bitcoins acceptance, and is co-opting it's original intent of decentralization and anonymity.
|
|
|
|
irfan01
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 13, 2015, 06:59:28 AM |
|
if a bankers wants to destroy bitcoin, surely the bitcoin users will be very angry
|
|
|
|
|