Who is John Conner , creator of Vanilla coin?

[nextgencoin]

John Conner today said that it was him that initially notified the Bitcoin team about the risk of double spend, he wasn't listened to and Bitcoin lost tons of people's money and Bitcoin had to in force no O confirmations. clearly he has been part of the a Bitcoin loop here for a long time.



Any ideas who he is, shouldn't be too hard to work out?


BTW he solved the issue....the guy is one to watch clearly.

[x0rcist]

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin?

Everyone deserves some privacy.. For me it's not important who he is but what the man delivers.

[monsterer]

John Conner today said that it was him that initially notified the Bitcoin team about the risk of double spend, he wasn't listened to and Bitcoin lost tons of people's money and Bitcoin had to in force no O confirmations.

Erm... what? The blockchain was designed to solve the double spend issue. I'm fairly sure that was produced by satoshi.

[x0rcist]

John Conner today said that it was him that initially notified the Bitcoin team about the risk of double spend, he wasn't listened to and Bitcoin lost tons of people's money and Bitcoin had to in force no O confirmations.

Erm... what? The blockchain was designed to solve the double spend issue. I'm fairly sure that was produced by satoshi.

First read this (the under the hood part):
http://cointelegraph.com/news/114794/miners-lost-over-50000-from-the-bitcoin-hardfork-last-weekend

Then read this:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5634#issuecomment-69481908

Then come back here and discuss.

[monsterer]

Then come back here and discuss.

That's concerning the accidental hark fork in bitcoin. Your point?

[x0rcist]

Then come back here and discuss.

That's concerning the accidental hark fork in bitcoin. Your point?

John discussed a fix for the DER issue 6 months ago.

[monsterer]

John discussed a fix for the DER issue 6 months ago.

Wasn't it deemed unsafe by gmaxwell? Just read the github thread you posted.

[nextgencoin]

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin?

Everyone deserves some privacy.. For me it's not important who he is but what the man delivers.

No I mean who is he in the Bitcoin community on this site, alias name of course.

[nextgencoin]

John Conner today said that it was him that initially notified the Bitcoin team about the risk of double spend, he wasn't listened to and Bitcoin lost tons of people's money and Bitcoin had to in force no O confirmations.

Erm... what? The blockchain was designed to solve the double spend issue. I'm fairly sure that was produced by satoshi.

First read this (the under the hood part):
http://cointelegraph.com/news/114794/miners-lost-over-50000-from-the-bitcoin-hardfork-last-weekend

Then read this:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5634#issuecomment-69481908

Then come back here and discuss.

I'm not a technical person but you got to love the way he responds to big core developers like a BOSS!!!

John Conner is the Donald Trump of Crypto! Lol


Maybe vanilla coin the name hides the fact it's such a quality project but seriously no one can deny the developer of this coin is a BOSS!

[monsterer]

gmaxwell to john-connor

Do not mistake your own ignorance about the technology or the history for any dishonesty on my part. But please feel free to discontinue posting on our repository if you're unwilling to conduct yourself in a professional manner.

[Tinkles]

I think he was in Terminator 

[x0rcist]

ofcourse we know who he is, it's ByteCoin ... 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=490

[nextgencoin]

so who was around when the first time double spend was highlighted as a problem, I assume on this site?

[monsterer]

so who was around when the first time double spend was highlighted as a problem, I assume on this site?

Double spending was solved for the first time by satoshi nakamoto in his famous paper which predates this site.

[solid12345]

so who was around when the first time double spend was highlighted as a problem, I assume on this site?

Double spending was solved for the first time by satoshi nakamoto in his famous paper which predates this site.

Can it be truly considered solved when it's occurred several times in Bitcoin's history?

[x0rcist]

so who was around when the first time double spend was highlighted as a problem, I assume on this site?

Double spending was solved for the first time by satoshi nakamoto in his famous paper which predates this site.

Solving things on paper is different from solving things in code. Just look at what happened to Bitcoin on the 4th of July.

Lets all believe gmaxwell how he told us they have more tools at their disposal to fix the issue than just hard forks. Then why did they do a hard fork to fix the issue and horribly failed to get consensus

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5634#issuecomment-69485630

[BadAss.Sx]

Here are the facts of John Connor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Connor

[monsterer]

Can it be truly considered solved when it's occurred several times in Bitcoin's history?

Yes. Proof of work is the only proven solution to the problem.

[nextgencoin]

ofcourse we know who he is, it's ByteCoin ...  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=490

Awesome if it is, he seems half genius half belligerent...I like him already.

Great we have such a pioneer in Bitcoin development in this coin. Clearly he thought out properly what Bitcoin needed to evole. Everyone is chasing Ethereum, but I think it might be a red herring and actually the big news now is Vanilla coin. woop woop. I'm glad I invested.  



It certain sounds like the same guy...

[Este Nuno]

Hal Finney was the first to point out the 0 confirmation double spend attack. And it's named the 'Finney Attack' in his honour.

I think it's safe to say with absolutely certainty that he is not Hal Finney.

And the fact that he would claim this was his own doing is extremely concerning and I'd advise people to be suspicious of someone making these sorts of claims that are both without evidence, and impossible anyway.