Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2024, 09:18:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: what kind of supply you would be agree with?
21 million - 19 (95%)
up to 42 million - 0 (0%)
more than 42 million but w/ hard limit - 0 (0%)
unlimited w/ 1% inflation - 1 (5%)
up to 2% inflation - 0 (0%)
more than 3% inflation - 0 (0%)
other. - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 20

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: bitcoin supply discussion/suggestion  (Read 1239 times)
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2015, 12:52:57 PM
 #21

yes.  unfortunately it is not a joke.  that is a great feature for xt and they actually have discussed it.  i can't find the quote but hearn has spoken of increasing the supply in order to keep mining going with the zero fee initiative.
The problem is that people aren't seeing this. I would definitely like to see the block size increased but not with Bitcoin XT, and not like this.
Hearns intentions are not pure and increasing the supply would damage Bitcoin beyond repair.

There is no problem with Bitcoin's supply.
I concur.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Scaccomatt0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000


https://cryptoworld.io


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2015, 04:06:32 PM
 #22

the supply number makes no difference. If we have 21m, 42m, 50t btc, nothing change but the value.

The supply limit must not change. The only thing that will change is the price.

       


████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
               ______
          __███████████████_      █████         █████          █████           █████
       _█████████████████████      █████         █████        █████           █████
     _███████¯¯¯     ¯¯██████       █████         █████      █████           █████
   _██████¯            ¯████¯        █████         █████    █████           █████
  ██████¯                             █████          ██████████            █████
 ██████                               █████          ██████████            █████
 █████                                 █████         ██████████            █████
█████                                  █████          ████████            █████
█████                                  █████           ██████             █████
█████                                  █████           ██████             █████
█████                                  █████           ██████            █████    
█████                                   █████          ██████          █████    
 █████                                  █████          ██████          █████
 ██████                                 █████          ██████        █████
  ██████_                                █████         ██████        █████
   ¯██████_            _████_            █████        ████████       █████
     ¯███████___     __██████            █████      █████  █████     █████
       ¯█████████████████████             █████    █████    █████   █████
          ¯¯███████████████¯               ████████████      ███████████
               ¯¯¯¯¯¯                      ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯         ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
|
  
FAUCET
ICO
ANDROID
       


████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
mrbrt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 707
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 14, 2015, 04:31:14 PM
 #23

yes.  unfortunately it is not a joke.  that is a great feature for xt and they actually have discussed it.  i can't find the quote but hearn has spoken of increasing the supply in order to keep mining going with the zero fee initiative.
The problem is that people aren't seeing this. I would definitely like to see the block size increased but not with Bitcoin XT, and not like this.
Hearns intentions are not pure and increasing the supply would damage Bitcoin beyond repair.


You could also say that increasing the block size, which would further centralize the network, would damage bitcoin beyond repair.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4508
Merit: 3417



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 04:50:37 PM
 #24

... i would suggest to terminate the hard limit of possible supply and fix the 1% minimum inflation, why? ...

There have been hundreds, if not thousands of posts, just like this one and the answer has always been that you are looking for a solution to something to a non-problem.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!